166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27669667)
1. Cost-effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy in patients with many comorbidities and severe wounds of various etiology.
Driver VR; Eckert KA; Carter MJ; French MA
Wound Repair Regen; 2016 Nov; 24(6):1041-1058. PubMed ID: 27669667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by primary closure.
Webster J; Liu Z; Norman G; Dumville JC; Chiverton L; Scuffham P; Stankiewicz M; Chaboyer WP
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2019 Mar; 3(3):CD009261. PubMed ID: 30912582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-utility of a biofilm-disrupting gel versus standard of care in chronic wounds: a Markov microsimulation model based on a randomised controlled trial.
Carter MJ; Myntti MF
J Wound Care; 2019 Jul; 28(Sup7):S24-S38. PubMed ID: 31295074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-minimization Analysis of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Long-term Care Facilities.
Adeyemi A; Waycaster C
Wounds; 2018 Feb; 30(2):E13-E15. PubMed ID: 29481332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of health care costs and hospital readmission rates associated with negative pressure wound therapies.
Law A; Cyhaniuk A; Krebs B
Wounds; 2015 Mar; 27(3):63-72. PubMed ID: 25786078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Early intervention of negative pressure wound therapy using Vacuum-Assisted Closure in trauma patients: impact on hospital length of stay and cost.
Kaplan M; Daly D; Stemkowski S
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2009 Mar; 22(3):128-32. PubMed ID: 19247014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-utility analysis of standard dressing compared with incisional negative-pressure wound therapy among patients with closed surgical wounds following major trauma to the lower limb.
Png ME; Madan JJ; Dritsaki M; Achten J; Parsons N; Fernandez M; Grant R; Nanchahal J; Costa ML;
Bone Joint J; 2020 Aug; 102-B(8):1072-1081. PubMed ID: 32731829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Comparing Single-use and Traditional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy to Treat Chronic Venous and Diabetic Foot Ulcers.
Kirsner RS; Delhougne G; Searle RJ
Wound Manag Prev; 2020 Mar; 66(3):30-36. PubMed ID: 32294054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Early versus deferred endovenous ablation of superficial venous reflux in patients with venous ulceration: the EVRA RCT.
Gohel MS; Heatley F; Liu X; Bradbury A; Bulbulia R; Cullum N; Epstein DM; Nyamekye I; Poskitt KR; Renton S; Warwick J; Davies AH
Health Technol Assess; 2019 May; 23(24):1-96. PubMed ID: 31140402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by primary closure.
Norman G; Goh EL; Dumville JC; Shi C; Liu Z; Chiverton L; Stankiewicz M; Reid A
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Jun; 6(6):CD009261. PubMed ID: 32542647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The economic benefits of negative pressure wound therapy in community-based wound care in the NHS.
Dowsett C; Davis L; Henderson V; Searle R
Int Wound J; 2012 Oct; 9(5):544-52. PubMed ID: 22321132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Providing cost-effective treatment of hard-to-heal wounds in the community through use of NPWT.
Hampton J
Br J Community Nurs; 2015 Jun; Suppl Community Wound Care():S14, S16-20. PubMed ID: 26052990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-effectiveness of screening for anal squamous intraepithelial lesions and anal cancer in human immunodeficiency virus-negative homosexual and bisexual men.
Goldie SJ; Kuntz KM; Weinstein MC; Freedberg KA; Palefsky JM
Am J Med; 2000 Jun; 108(8):634-41. PubMed ID: 10856411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness of Maintenance Capecitabine and Bevacizumab for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Sherman SK; Lange JJ; Dahdaleh FS; Rajeev R; Gamblin TC; Polite BN; Turaga KK
JAMA Oncol; 2019 Feb; 5(2):236-242. PubMed ID: 30489611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost-effectiveness of incisional negative pressure wound therapy compared with standard care after caesarean section in obese women: a trial-based economic evaluation.
Hyldig N; Joergensen JS; Wu C; Bille C; Vinter CA; Sorensen JA; Mogensen O; Lamont RF; Möller S; Kruse M
BJOG; 2019 Apr; 126(5):619-627. PubMed ID: 30507022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Negative pressure wound therapy for treating foot wounds in people with diabetes mellitus.
Liu Z; Dumville JC; Hinchliffe RJ; Cullum N; Game F; Stubbs N; Sweeting M; Peinemann F
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Oct; 10(10):CD010318. PubMed ID: 30328611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-effectiveness of revascularization for limb preservation in patients with marginal functional status.
Barshes NR; Kougias P; Ozaki CK; Pisimisis G; Bechara CF; Henson HK; Belkin M
Ann Vasc Surg; 2014 Jan; 28(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 24332257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-effectiveness of dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane allografts in lower extremity diabetic ulcer treatment.
Tettelbach WH; Armstrong DG; Chang TJ; Jong JL; Glat PM; Hsu JH; Kelso MR; Niezgoda JA; Labovitz JM; Hubbs B; Forsyth RA; Cohen BG; Reid NM; Padula WV
J Wound Care; 2022 Feb; 31(Sup2):S10-S31. PubMed ID: 35148642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by primary closure.
Norman G; Goh EL; Dumville JC; Shi C; Liu Z; Chiverton L; Stankiewicz M; Reid A
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 May; 5(5):CD009261. PubMed ID: 32356396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
