These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2767042)

  • 1. Symmetric and asymmetric manual materials handling. Part 1: Physiology and psychophysics.
    Drury CG; Deeb JM; Hartman B; Woolley S; Drury CE; Gallagher S
    Ergonomics; 1989 May; 32(5):467-89. PubMed ID: 2767042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the sensitivity of three psychophysical techniques to three manual materials handling task variables.
    Kumar S; Narayan Y; Bjornsdottir S
    Ergonomics; 1999 Jan; 42(1):61-73. PubMed ID: 9973872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Symmetric and asymmetric manual materials handling, Part 2: Biomechanics.
    Drury CG; Deeb JM; Hartman B; Woolley S; Drury CE; Gallagher S
    Ergonomics; 1989 Jun; 32(6):565-83. PubMed ID: 2776739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceived exertion of physical effort for various manual handling tasks.
    Asfour SS; Ayoub MM; Mital A; Bethea NJ
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1983 Mar; 44(3):223-8. PubMed ID: 6846149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acceptable weights and physiological costs of performing combined manual handling tasks in restricted postures.
    Gallagher S
    Ergonomics; 1991 Jul; 34(7):939-52. PubMed ID: 1915255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Handle positions and angles in a dynamic lifting task. Part 2. Psychophysical measures and heart rate.
    Drury CG; Deeb JM
    Ergonomics; 1986 Jun; 29(6):769-77. PubMed ID: 3743535
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Maximum acceptable weights for asymmetric lifting of Chinese females.
    Wu SP
    Appl Ergon; 2003 May; 34(3):215-24. PubMed ID: 12737921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A survey of the optimal handle position for boxes with different sizes and manual handling positions.
    Jung HS; Jung HS
    Appl Ergon; 2010 Jan; 41(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 19589498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The design of manual handling tasks: revised tables of maximum acceptable weights and forces.
    Snook SH; Ciriello VM
    Ergonomics; 1991 Sep; 34(9):1197-213. PubMed ID: 1743178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of risk assessment of single and combination manual handling tasks: 2. Discomfort, rating of perceived exertion and heart rate measures.
    Straker LM; Stevenson MG; Twomey LT
    Ergonomics; 1997 Jun; 40(6):656-69. PubMed ID: 9174417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of carrying methods and box handles on two-person team carrying capacity for females.
    Wu SP; Chang SY
    Appl Ergon; 2010 Jul; 41(4):615-9. PubMed ID: 20116781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Metabolic cost and subjective assessment of palletizing and subsequent recovery.
    Kumar S; Lechelt EC; Narayan Y; Chouinard K
    Ergonomics; 2000 Jun; 43(6):677-90. PubMed ID: 10902879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A manual materials handling study of bag lifting.
    Smith JL; Jiang BC
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1984 Aug; 45(8):505-8. PubMed ID: 6475757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Physiological and psychophysical responses in handling maximum acceptable weights under different footwear--floor friction conditions.
    Li KW; Yu RF; Han XL
    Appl Ergon; 2007 May; 38(3):259-65. PubMed ID: 17010302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of task variables and their interactions in lifting and lowering loads.
    Mital A; Ayoub MM
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1981 Feb; 42(2):134-42. PubMed ID: 7234678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of box handle position and carrying range on bi-manual carrying capacity for females.
    Wu SP; Loiu Y; Chien TH
    Ind Health; 2015; 53(5):410-6. PubMed ID: 26212410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The psychophysical approach to manual materials handling task design.
    Ayoub MM; Dempsey PG
    Ergonomics; 1999 Jan; 42(1):17-31. PubMed ID: 9973869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of box features on spine loading during warehouse order selecting.
    Marras WS; Granata KP; Davis KG; Allread WG; Jorgensen MJ
    Ergonomics; 1999 Jul; 42(7):980-96. PubMed ID: 10424186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Further studies of psychophysically determined maximum acceptable weights and forces.
    Ciriello VM; Snook SH; Hughes GJ
    Hum Factors; 1993 Mar; 35(1):175-86. PubMed ID: 8509102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of asymmetry on psychophysical lifting capacity for three lifting types.
    Han B; Stobbe TJ; Hobbs GR
    Ergonomics; 2005 Mar; 48(4):364-79. PubMed ID: 15804846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.