These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27670803)

  • 1. Combination with anti-tit-for-tat remedies problems of tit-for-tat.
    Yi SD; Baek SK; Choi JK
    J Theor Biol; 2017 Jan; 412():1-7. PubMed ID: 27670803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Human cooperation in the simultaneous and the alternating Prisoner's Dilemma: Pavlov versus Generous Tit-for-Tat.
    Wedekind C; Milinski M
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1996 Apr; 93(7):2686-9. PubMed ID: 11607644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Duality between cooperation and defection in the presence of tit-for-tat in replicator dynamics.
    Baek SK; Yi SD; Jeong HC
    J Theor Biol; 2017 Oct; 430():215-220. PubMed ID: 28755954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tit-for-tat or win-stay, lose-shift?
    Imhof LA; Fudenberg D; Nowak MA
    J Theor Biol; 2007 Aug; 247(3):574-80. PubMed ID: 17481667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The extended reciprocity: Strong belief outperforms persistence.
    Kurokawa S
    J Theor Biol; 2017 May; 421():16-27. PubMed ID: 28347728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A simple rule of direct reciprocity leads to the stable coexistence of cooperation and defection in the Prisoner's Dilemma game.
    Zheng XD; Li C; Yu JR; Wang SC; Fan SJ; Zhang BY; Tao Y
    J Theor Biol; 2017 May; 420():12-17. PubMed ID: 28259660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. TIT FOR TAT in sticklebacks and the evolution of cooperation.
    Milinski M
    Nature; 1987 Jan 29-Feb 4; 325(6103):433-5. PubMed ID: 3808044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A strategy of win-stay, lose-shift that outperforms tit-for-tat in the Prisoner's Dilemma game.
    Nowak M; Sigmund K
    Nature; 1993 Jul; 364(6432):56-8. PubMed ID: 8316296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evolution of cooperation in a particular case of the infinitely repeated prisoner's dilemma with three strategies.
    Núñez Rodríguez I; Neves AG
    J Math Biol; 2016 Dec; 73(6-7):1665-1690. PubMed ID: 27095086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. No strategy is evolutionarily stable in the repeated prisoner's dilemma.
    Lorberbaum J
    J Theor Biol; 1994 May; 168(2):117-30. PubMed ID: 8022193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is Tit-for-Tat the Answer? On the Conclusions Drawn from Axelrod's Tournaments.
    Rapoport A; Seale DA; Colman AM
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0134128. PubMed ID: 26225422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Working memory constrains human cooperation in the Prisoner's Dilemma.
    Milinski M; Wedekind C
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1998 Nov; 95(23):13755-8. PubMed ID: 9811873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Which facilitates the evolution of cooperation more, retaliation or persistence?
    Kurokawa S
    Math Biosci; 2017 Jul; 289():20-28. PubMed ID: 28431890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spatialization and greater generosity in the stochastic Prisoner's Dilemma.
    Grim P
    Biosystems; 1996; 37(1-2):3-17. PubMed ID: 8924636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The excuse principle can maintain cooperation through forgivable defection in the Prisoner's Dilemma game.
    Krams I; Kokko H; Vrublevska J; Abolins-Abols M; Krama T; Rantala MJ
    Proc Biol Sci; 2013 Sep; 280(1766):20131475. PubMed ID: 23864603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimality under noise: higher memory strategies for the alternating prisoner's dilemma.
    Neill DB
    J Theor Biol; 2001 Jul; 211(2):159-80. PubMed ID: 11419957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Iterated prisoner's dilemma in an asocial world dominated by loners, not by defectors.
    Castro L; Toro MA
    Theor Popul Biol; 2008 Aug; 74(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 18490041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contingencies of reinforcement in a five-person prisoner's dilemma.
    Yi R; Rachlin H
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2004 Sep; 82(2):161-76. PubMed ID: 15540503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Invading wave of cooperation in a spatial iterated prisoner's dilemma.
    Ferriere R; Michod RE
    Proc Biol Sci; 1995 Jan; 259(1354):77-83. PubMed ID: 7700879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Resolving the iterated prisoner's dilemma: theory and reality.
    Raihani NJ; Bshary R
    J Evol Biol; 2011 Aug; 24(8):1628-39. PubMed ID: 21599777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.