These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27671870)

  • 1. Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the pressure ulcer prevention knowledge assessment instrument.
    Tulek Z; Polat C; Ozkan I; Theofanidis D; Togrol RE
    J Tissue Viability; 2016 Nov; 25(4):201-208. PubMed ID: 27671870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pressure ulcer prevention: development and psychometric validation of a knowledge assessment instrument.
    Beeckman D; Vanderwee K; Demarré L; Paquay L; Van Hecke A; Defloor T
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2010 Apr; 47(4):399-410. PubMed ID: 19781701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of pressure ulcer knowledge assessment tool-updated version (PUKAT 2.0).
    Dalli ÖE; Yildirim Y; Çalişkan G; Girgin NK
    J Tissue Viability; 2022 Feb; 31(1):52-57. PubMed ID: 34429220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Determination of nurses' level of knowledge on the prevention of pressure ulcers: The case of Turkey.
    Sengul T; Karadag A
    J Tissue Viability; 2020 Nov; 29(4):337-341. PubMed ID: 32800627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Descriptive, Cross-sectional Survey of Turkish Nurses' Knowledge of Pressure Ulcer Risk, Prevention, and Staging.
    Gul A; Andsoy II; Ozkaya B; Zeydan A
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2017 Jun; 63(6):40-46. PubMed ID: 28657899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validity and reliability of Japanese version of the pressure ulcer knowledge assessment tool.
    Yamamoto-Kon A; Fukahori H; Ogata Y; Nagano M
    J Tissue Viability; 2021 Nov; 30(4):566-570. PubMed ID: 34407913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the pressure injury knowledge assessment tool 2.0.
    Ursavaş FE; Bayrak D
    J Tissue Viability; 2021 Nov; 30(4):582-587. PubMed ID: 33994078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Descriptive Study of Turkish Intensive Care Nurses' Pressure Ulcer Prevention Knowledge, Attitudes, and Perceived Barriers to Care.
    Aydogan S; Caliskan N
    Wound Manag Prev; 2019 Feb; 65(2):39-47. PubMed ID: 30730304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of The Pressure Injury Prevention Knowledge Questionnaire(PIPK).
    Bahar A; Özgürbüz NE
    J Tissue Viability; 2022 Feb; 31(1):30-37. PubMed ID: 34801351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Examination of the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the attitude towards pressure ulcer prevention instrument in nurses.
    Akhkand SS; Seidi J; Ebadi A; Ghanei Gheshlagh R
    J Tissue Viability; 2021 Feb; 30(1):116-120. PubMed ID: 33187791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validity and Reliability of the Pieper-Zulkowski Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Test for Use in Turkey.
    Yeşil M; Toygar İ; Aslan FE
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2024 Mar; 37(3):1-5. PubMed ID: 38393708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Turkish version of the Skin Tear Knowledge Assessment Instrument (OASES): Validity and reliability study.
    Yüceler Kaçmaz H; Karadağ A; Akutay S; Çobanoğlu Aktan D
    Int Wound J; 2024 Aug; 21(8):e70013. PubMed ID: 39087729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Quasi-experimental Study to Assess an Interactive Educational Intervention on Nurses' Knowledge of Pressure Ulcer Prevention in Nigeria.
    Ekama Ilesanmi R; Morohunfoluwa Oluwatosin O
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2016 Apr; 62(4):30-40. PubMed ID: 27065217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliability and validity of a Turkish language version of the Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool.
    Karahan A; Toruner EK; Ceylan A; Abbasoglu A; Tekindal A; Buyukgonenc L
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2014; 41(4):340-4. PubMed ID: 24988512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development and psychometric validation of a questionnaire to evaluate nurses' adherence to recommendations for preventing pressure ulcers (QARPPU).
    Moya-Suárez AB; Morales-Asencio JM; Aranda-Gallardo M; Enríquez de Luna-Rodríguez M; Canca-Sánchez JC
    J Tissue Viability; 2017 Nov; 26(4):260-270. PubMed ID: 28911962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The validity and reliability of the Pressure Ulcer Quality of Life instrument: A methodological study.
    Gül Ş; Avşar P; Karadağ A; Karaçay P; Gökmen D
    J Tissue Viability; 2023 Feb; 32(1):102-106. PubMed ID: 36535811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of an evidence-based education program for pressure ulcer prevention.
    Sinclair L; Berwiczonek H; Thurston N; Butler S; Bulloch G; Ellery C; Giesbrecht G
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2004; 31(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 15128094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development and psychometric validation of PUKAT 2·0, a knowledge assessment tool for pressure ulcer prevention.
    Manderlier B; Van Damme N; Vanderwee K; Verhaeghe S; Van Hecke A; Beeckman D
    Int Wound J; 2017 Dec; 14(6):1041-1051. PubMed ID: 28547752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Physiotherapists' knowledge on pressure ulcer prevention.
    Ozcan O; Karaali HK
    Int Wound J; 2023 Aug; 20(6):1893-1902. PubMed ID: 36535803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development and psychometric evaluation of an instrument to assess venous leg ulcer lifestyle knowledge among nurses.
    Van Hecke A; Goeman C; Beeckman D; Heinen M; Defloor T
    J Adv Nurs; 2011 Dec; 67(12):2574-85. PubMed ID: 21592187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.