BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

456 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27672038)

  • 21. Mre11-Sae2 and RPA Collaborate to Prevent Palindromic Gene Amplification.
    Deng SK; Yin Y; Petes TD; Symington LS
    Mol Cell; 2015 Nov; 60(3):500-8. PubMed ID: 26545079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The RecQ DNA helicase Rqh1 constrains Exonuclease 1-dependent recombination at stalled replication forks.
    Osman F; Ahn JS; Lorenz A; Whitby MC
    Sci Rep; 2016 Mar; 6():22837. PubMed ID: 26957021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Replisome instability, fork collapse, and gross chromosomal rearrangements arise synergistically from Mec1 kinase and RecQ helicase mutations.
    Cobb JA; Schleker T; Rojas V; Bjergbaek L; Tercero JA; Gasser SM
    Genes Dev; 2005 Dec; 19(24):3055-69. PubMed ID: 16357221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Mus81 functions in the quality control of replication forks at the rDNA and is involved in the maintenance of rDNA repeat number in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
    Ii M; Ii T; Brill SJ
    Mutat Res; 2007 Dec; 625(1-2):1-19. PubMed ID: 17555773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Differential regulation of homologous recombination at DNA breaks and replication forks by the Mrc1 branch of the S-phase checkpoint.
    Alabert C; Bianco JN; Pasero P
    EMBO J; 2009 Apr; 28(8):1131-41. PubMed ID: 19322196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Inhibition of spindle extension through the yeast S phase checkpoint is coupled to replication fork stability and the integrity of centromeric DNA.
    Julius J; Peng J; McCulley A; Caridi C; Arnak R; See C; Nugent CI; Feng W; Bachant J
    Mol Biol Cell; 2019 Oct; 30(22):2771-2789. PubMed ID: 31509480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. S-phase checkpoint prevents leading strand degradation from strand-associated nicks at stalled replication forks.
    Bugallo A; Sánchez M; Fernández-García M; Segurado M
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2024 May; 52(9):5121-5137. PubMed ID: 38520409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Stalled replication forks generate a distinct mutational signature in yeast.
    Larsen NB; Liberti SE; Vogel I; Jørgensen SW; Hickson ID; Mankouri HW
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Sep; 114(36):9665-9670. PubMed ID: 28827358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Dna2 helicase/nuclease causes replicative fork stalling and double-strand breaks in the ribosomal DNA of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
    Weitao T; Budd M; Hoopes LL; Campbell JL
    J Biol Chem; 2003 Jun; 278(25):22513-22. PubMed ID: 12686542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. 14-3-3 Proteins regulate exonuclease 1-dependent processing of stalled replication forks.
    Engels K; Giannattasio M; Muzi-Falconi M; Lopes M; Ferrari S
    PLoS Genet; 2011 Apr; 7(4):e1001367. PubMed ID: 21533173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Checkpoint genes and Exo1 regulate nearby inverted repeat fusions that form dicentric chromosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
    Kaochar S; Shanks L; Weinert T
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2010 Dec; 107(50):21605-10. PubMed ID: 21098663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Rad53 limits CMG helicase uncoupling from DNA synthesis at replication forks.
    Devbhandari S; Remus D
    Nat Struct Mol Biol; 2020 May; 27(5):461-471. PubMed ID: 32341532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of mutations in SGS1 and in genes functionally related to SGS1 on inverted repeat-stimulated spontaneous unequal sister-chromatid exchange in yeast.
    Nag DK; Cavallo SJ
    BMC Mol Biol; 2007 Dec; 8():120. PubMed ID: 18166135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cleavage of stalled forks by fission yeast Mus81/Eme1 in absence of DNA replication checkpoint.
    Froget B; Blaisonneau J; Lambert S; Baldacci G
    Mol Biol Cell; 2008 Feb; 19(2):445-56. PubMed ID: 18032583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Exploring the roles of Mus81-Eme1/Mms4 at perturbed replication forks.
    Osman F; Whitby MC
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2007 Jul; 6(7):1004-17. PubMed ID: 17409028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evidence that yeast SGS1, DNA2, SRS2, and FOB1 interact to maintain rDNA stability.
    Weitao T; Budd M; Campbell JL
    Mutat Res; 2003 Nov; 532(1-2):157-72. PubMed ID: 14643435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Requirement of the Mre11 complex and exonuclease 1 for activation of the Mec1 signaling pathway.
    Nakada D; Hirano Y; Sugimoto K
    Mol Cell Biol; 2004 Nov; 24(22):10016-25. PubMed ID: 15509802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Checkpoint-mediated control of replisome-fork association and signalling in response to replication pausing.
    Lucca C; Vanoli F; Cotta-Ramusino C; Pellicioli A; Liberi G; Haber J; Foiani M
    Oncogene; 2004 Feb; 23(6):1206-13. PubMed ID: 14647447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Sae2 promotes DNA damage resistance by removing the Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 complex from DNA and attenuating Rad53 signaling.
    Chen H; Donnianni RA; Handa N; Deng SK; Oh J; Timashev LA; Kowalczykowski SC; Symington LS
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Apr; 112(15):E1880-7. PubMed ID: 25831494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Suppression of genomic instability by SLX5 and SLX8 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
    Zhang C; Roberts TM; Yang J; Desai R; Brown GW
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2006 Mar; 5(3):336-46. PubMed ID: 16325482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.