These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27673310)
1. Single-blind vs Double-blind Peer Review in the Setting of Author Prestige. Okike K; Hug KT; Kocher MS; Leopold SS JAMA; 2016 Sep; 316(12):1315-6. PubMed ID: 27673310 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Manuscripts: to blind, or not to blind, that is the question. Rogers LF AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Dec; 179(6):1373. PubMed ID: 12438019 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The fallacy of double-blinded peer review. Liebeskind DS AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Nov; 181(5):1422; author reply 1422-3. PubMed ID: 14573448 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Double-blind review: the paw print is a giveaway. Naqvi KR Nature; 2008 Mar; 452(7183):28. PubMed ID: 18322504 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Double-blind review: easy to guess in specialist fields. Lane D Nature; 2008 Mar; 452(7183):28. PubMed ID: 18322503 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Double-blind review: let diversity reign. O'Hara B Nature; 2008 Mar; 452(7183):28. PubMed ID: 18322502 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Who stands to lose from double-blind review? Garvalov BK Nature; 2008 Mar; 452(7183):28. PubMed ID: 18322505 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Incidence and nature of unblinding by authors: our experience at two radiology journals with double-blinded peer review policies. Katz DS; Proto AV; Olmsted WW AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Dec; 179(6):1415-7. PubMed ID: 12438028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. More about peer review: is it time for double-blind reviews? Klein JR Nat Immunol; 2001 Oct; 2(10):892. PubMed ID: 11577338 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Peer-review system could gain from author feedback. Korngreen A Nature; 2005 Nov; 438(7066):282. PubMed ID: 16292281 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Digital identifiers could keep up with authors' moves. Aerts R Nature; 2008 Jul; 454(7204):575. PubMed ID: 18668082 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The garbage collectors: could a particular sector of author-pays journals become silently acknowledged collectors of scientific waste? Moore A Bioessays; 2009 Aug; 31(8):821. PubMed ID: 19609967 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]