These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27673519)

  • 1. Crowdsourcing as a Novel Method to Evaluate Aesthetic Outcomes of Treatment for Unilateral Cleft Lip.
    Tse RW; Oh E; Gruss JS; Hopper RA; Birgfeld CB
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Oct; 138(4):864-874. PubMed ID: 27673519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Asher-McDade Aesthetic Index in Comparison With Two Scoring Systems in Nonsyndromic Complete Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients.
    Mosmuller DG; Bijnen CL; Kramer GJ; Disse MA; Prahl C; Kuik DJ; Niessen FB; Don Griot JP
    J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Jun; 26(4):1242-5. PubMed ID: 26080166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Applied Online Crowdsourcing in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: A Comparison of Aesthetic Outcomes in Unilateral Cleft Lip Repair Techniques.
    Suchyta M; Azad A; Patel AA; Khosla RK; Lorenz HP; Nazerali RS
    Ann Plast Surg; 2020 May; 84(5S Suppl 4):S307-S310. PubMed ID: 32282397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Crowdsourced Assessment of Aesthetic Outcomes after Breast Reconstruction.
    Teotia SS; Alford JA; Kadakia Y; Haddock NT
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Mar; 147(3):570-577. PubMed ID: 33620921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the Basal View and a Previously Standardized Cleft Lip Rating Scale.
    Klein GM; Dhawan A; Laskowski RA; Peredo AL; Kelly R; Gelfand MA; Khan SU; Bui DT; Dagum AB
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2018 Oct; 55(9):1277-1281. PubMed ID: 29578807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Comparative Study of the Aesthetic Outcome of Two Techniques for Unilateral Complete Cleft Lip Repair.
    Phillips GSA; Swan MC; Sawyer AR; Goodacre TEE; Cadier M
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2017 Oct; 140(4):757-764. PubMed ID: 28953726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Use of Crowdsourcing Technology to Evaluate Preoperative Severity in Patients With Unilateral Cleft Lip in a Multiethnic Population.
    McCullough M; Auslander A; Nagengast ES; Yao CA; Swanson JW; Magee WP
    J Craniofac Surg; 2021 Mar-Apr 01; 32(2):482-485. PubMed ID: 33704965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Americleft Project: A Modification of Asher-McDade Method for Rating Nasolabial Esthetics in Patients With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Using Q-sort.
    Stoutland A; Long RE; Mercado A; Daskalogiannakis J; Hathaway RR; Russell KA; Singer E; Semb G; Shaw WC
    J Craniofac Surg; 2017 Nov; 28(8):1911-1917. PubMed ID: 28906328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validating the Asher-McDade score to assess facial aesthetic outcomes in 22 consecutive complete bilateral cleft lip repairs.
    Thomson RM; Azzopardi E; Drake D
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Apr; 59(3):375-379. PubMed ID: 33349494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Preliminary study on reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Asher-McDade aesthetic index.
    Chen L; Zeng N; Shi B; Huang H
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2024 Feb; 42(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 38475957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nasolabial Aesthetics Following Cleft Repair: An Objective Evaluation of Subjective Assessment.
    Kantar RS; Maliha SG; Alfonso AR; Wang MM; Ramly EP; Eisemann BS; Shetye PR; Grayson BH; Flores RL
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2019 Oct; 56(9):1157-1163. PubMed ID: 31117813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reference photographs for nasolabial appearance rating in unilateral cleft lip and palate.
    Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Nollet PJ; Semb G; Bronkhorst EM; Shaw WC; Katsaros C
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 20 Suppl 2():1683-6. PubMed ID: 19816333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of nasolabial aesthetics by different groups in operated unilateral cleft lip and palate.
    Dogan E; Tiftikcioglu Y; Dogan S
    J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Dec; 121(6):672-679. PubMed ID: 32007634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative evaluation of nasolabial appearance of unilateral cleft lip and palate patients by professional, patient and layperson using 2 aesthetic scoring systems: A cross sectional study.
    Duggal I; Talwar A; Duggal R; Chaudhari PK; Samrit V
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2023 Nov; 26(4):660-666. PubMed ID: 37061872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of two- and three-dimensional assessment methods of nasolabial appearance in cleft lip and palate patients: Do the assessment methods measure the same outcome?
    Mosmuller DGM; Maal TJ; Prahl C; Tan RA; Mulder FJ; Schwirtz RMF; de Vet HCW; Bergé SJ; Don Griot JPW
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Aug; 45(8):1220-1226. PubMed ID: 28552202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Americleft Project: A Proposed Expanded Nasolabial Appearance Yardstick for 5- to 7-Year-Old Patients With Complete Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate (CUCLP).
    Mercado AM; Russell KA; Daskalogiannakis J; Hathaway RR; Semb G; Ozawa T; Smith A; Lin AY; Long RE
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2016 Jan; 53(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 25844562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A simple assessment method for auditing multi-centre unilateral cleft lip repairs.
    Kim JB; Strike P; Cadier MC
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2011 Feb; 64(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 20471927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Facial Aesthetic Outcomes of Cleft Surgery: Assessment of Discrete Lip and Nose Images Compared with Digital Symmetry Analysis.
    Deall CE; Kornmann NSS; Bella H; Wallis KL; Hardwicke JT; Su TL; Richard BM
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Oct; 138(4):855-862. PubMed ID: 27307335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Long-Term Comparison of the Aesthetic Outcomes between Nasoalveolar Molding- and Non-Nasoalveolar Molding-Treated Patients with Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate.
    Nayak T; Bonanthaya K; Parmar R; Shetty PN
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Nov; 148(5):775e-784e. PubMed ID: 34705782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Cleft Aesthetic Rating Scale for 18-Year-Old Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients: A Tool for Nasolabial Aesthetics Assessment.
    Mulder FJ; Mosmuller DGM; de Vet HCW; Mouës CM; Breugem CC; van der Molen ABM; Don Griot JPW
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2018 Aug; 55(7):1006-1012. PubMed ID: 27996297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.