These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27676588)

  • 1. Risk assessment with actuarial and clinical methods: Measurement and evidence-based practice.
    Mendoza NS; Rose RA; Geiger JM; Cash SJ
    Child Abuse Negl; 2016 Nov; 61():1-12. PubMed ID: 27676588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Decision making in child protection: An international comparative study on maltreatment substantiation, risk assessment and interventions recommendations, and the role of professionals' child welfare attitudes.
    Benbenishty R; Davidson-Arad B; López M; Devaney J; Spratt T; Koopmans C; Knorth EJ; Witteman CL; Del Valle JF; Hayes D
    Child Abuse Negl; 2015 Nov; 49():63-75. PubMed ID: 25935254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Risk and safety assessment in child welfare: instrument comparisons.
    D'Andrade A; Austin MJ; Benton A
    J Evid Based Soc Work; 2008; 5(1-2):31-56. PubMed ID: 19064444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The validity and utility of the California Family Risk Assessment under practice conditions in the field: A prospective study.
    Johnson WL
    Child Abuse Negl; 2011 Jan; 35(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 21316761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predicting child maltreatment: A meta-analysis of the predictive validity of risk assessment instruments.
    van der Put CE; Assink M; Boekhout van Solinge NF
    Child Abuse Negl; 2017 Nov; 73():71-88. PubMed ID: 28945998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does caregiver participation in decision making within child welfare agencies influence children's primary and mental health care service use?
    Jolles MP; Wells R
    Child Care Health Dev; 2017 Mar; 43(2):192-201. PubMed ID: 27470153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development of an instrument to understand the child protective services decision-making process, with a focus on placement decisions.
    Dettlaff AJ; Christopher Graham J; Holzman J; Baumann DJ; Fluke JD
    Child Abuse Negl; 2015 Nov; 49():24-34. PubMed ID: 25913382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Impact of Family Engagement and Child Welfare Services on Maltreatment Re-reports and Substantiated Re-reports.
    Fuller T; Zhang S
    Child Maltreat; 2017 Aug; 22(3):183-193. PubMed ID: 28539093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The decision of out-of-home placement in residential care after parental neglect: Empirically testing a psychosocial model.
    Rodrigues L; Calheiros M; Pereira C
    Child Abuse Negl; 2015 Nov; 49():35-49. PubMed ID: 25882668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predictive analytics and child protection: constraints and opportunities.
    Russell J
    Child Abuse Negl; 2015 Aug; 46():182-9. PubMed ID: 26142916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Examining the role of child welfare worker characteristics and the substantiation decision.
    Lwin K; Hoagland A; Antwi-Boasiako K; MacKenzie P; Fallon B
    Child Abuse Negl; 2024 Mar; 149():106641. PubMed ID: 38244383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reunification in foster care: Influences on decision-making.
    Carvalho JMS; Delgado P; Pinto VS; Benbenishty R
    Child Abuse Negl; 2018 Dec; 86():67-78. PubMed ID: 30268866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Caseworker judgments and substantiation.
    Cross TP; Casanueva C
    Child Maltreat; 2009 Feb; 14(1):38-52. PubMed ID: 18794302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Decision-making in child protective services: Influences at multiple levels of the social ecology.
    Font SA; Maguire-Jack K
    Child Abuse Negl; 2015 Sep; 47():70-82. PubMed ID: 25726323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Decreasing Ambiguity in Child Protection.
    Harper G
    J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry; 2016 May; 55(5):349-50. PubMed ID: 27126844
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Risk assessment in child protective services: consensus and actuarial model reliability.
    Baird C; Wagner D; Healy T; Johnson K
    Child Welfare; 1999; 78(6):723-48. PubMed ID: 10627988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using family network data in child protection services.
    James A; McLeod J; Hendy S; Marks K; Rusu D; Nik S; Plank MJ
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0224554. PubMed ID: 31661513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Screening for potential child maltreatment in parents of a newborn baby: The predictive validity of an Instrument for early identification of Parents At Risk for child Abuse and Neglect (IPARAN).
    van der Put CE; Bouwmeester-Landweer MBR; Landsmeer-Beker EA; Wit JM; Dekker FW; Kousemaker NPJ; Baartman HEM
    Child Abuse Negl; 2017 Aug; 70():160-168. PubMed ID: 28618320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Family assessment in child welfare services: instrument comparisons.
    Johnson M; Stone S; Lou C; Vu CM; Ling J; Mizrahi P; Austin MJ
    J Evid Based Soc Work; 2008; 5(1-2):57-90. PubMed ID: 19064445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validation and further development of a risk assessment instrument for child welfare.
    Vial A; van der Put C; Stams GJJM; Dinkgreve M; Assink M
    Child Abuse Negl; 2021 Jul; 117():105047. PubMed ID: 33838396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.