These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27677439)

  • 1. Systematic genotyping of groups of cows to improve genomic estimated breeding values of selection candidates.
    Plieschke L; Edel C; Pimentel EC; Emmerling R; Bennewitz J; Götz KU
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Sep; 48(1):73. PubMed ID: 27677439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Short communication: The effect of genotyping cows to improve the reliability of genomic predictions for selection candidates.
    Edel C; Pimentel ECG; Plieschke L; Emmerling R; Götz KU
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Mar; 99(3):1999-2004. PubMed ID: 26723131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges.
    Hayes BJ; Bowman PJ; Chamberlain AJ; Goddard ME
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Feb; 92(2):433-43. PubMed ID: 19164653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliability of direct genomic values for animals with different relationships within and to the reference population.
    Pszczola M; Strabel T; Mulder HA; Calus MP
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Jan; 95(1):389-400. PubMed ID: 22192218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of enlarging the reference population with (un)genotyped animals on the accuracy of genomic selection in dairy cattle.
    Pszczola M; Mulder HA; Calus MP
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Jan; 94(1):431-41. PubMed ID: 21183054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genotyping strategies for genomic selection in small dairy cattle populations.
    Jiménez-Montero JA; González-Recio O; Alenda R
    Animal; 2012 Aug; 6(8):1216-24. PubMed ID: 23217224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Short communication: genomic evaluations of final score for US Holsteins benefit from the inclusion of genotypes on cows.
    Tsuruta S; Misztal I; Lawlor TJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 May; 96(5):3332-5. PubMed ID: 23477821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Application of selection index calculations to determine selection strategies in genomic breeding programs.
    König S; Swalve HH
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Oct; 92(10):5292-303. PubMed ID: 19762847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimal strategies for the use of genomic selection in dairy cattle breeding programs.
    Wensch-Dorendorf M; Yin T; Swalve HH; König S
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Aug; 94(8):4140-51. PubMed ID: 21787949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Most of the benefits from genomic selection can be realized by genotyping a small proportion of available selection candidates.
    Henryon M; Berg P; Ostersen T; Nielsen B; Sørensen AC
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(13):4681-9. PubMed ID: 23087087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genomic prediction using imputed whole-genome sequence data in Holstein Friesian cattle.
    van Binsbergen R; Calus MP; Bink MC; van Eeuwijk FA; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Sep; 47(1):71. PubMed ID: 26381777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliabilities of genomic estimated breeding values in Danish Jersey.
    Thomasen JR; Guldbrandtsen B; Su G; Brøndum RF; Lund MS
    Animal; 2012 May; 6(5):789-96. PubMed ID: 22558926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predicted accuracy of and response to genomic selection for new traits in dairy cattle.
    Calus MP; de Haas Y; Pszczola M; Veerkamp RF
    Animal; 2013 Feb; 7(2):183-91. PubMed ID: 23031684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contribution of domestic production records, Interbull estimated breeding values, and single nucleotide polymorphism genetic markers to the single-step genomic evaluation of milk production.
    Přibyl J; Madsen P; Bauer J; Přibylová J; Simečková M; Vostrý L; Zavadilová L
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Mar; 96(3):1865-73. PubMed ID: 23312993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Potential gains in lifetime net merit from genomic testing of cows, heifers, and calves on commercial dairy farms.
    Weigel KA; Hoffman PC; Herring W; Lawlor TJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Apr; 95(4):2215-25. PubMed ID: 22459867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of genotyping different groups of animals on accuracy when moving from traditional to genomic selection.
    Pszczola M; Strabel T; van Arendonk JAM; Calus MPL
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Sep; 95(9):5412-5421. PubMed ID: 22916948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of selective genotyping strategies for prediction of breeding values in a population undergoing selection.
    Boligon AA; Long N; Albuquerque LG; Weigel KA; Gianola D; Rosa GJ
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(13):4716-22. PubMed ID: 23372045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The importance of haplotype length and heritability using genomic selection in dairy cattle.
    Villumsen TM; Janss L; Lund MS
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2009 Feb; 126(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 19207924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Weighting factors of sire daughter information in international genetic evaluations.
    Fikse WF; Banos G
    J Dairy Sci; 2001 Jul; 84(7):1759-67. PubMed ID: 11467826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A simple method for genomic selection of moderately sized dairy cattle populations.
    Weller JI; Ron M; Glick G; Shirak A; Zeron Y; Ezra E
    Animal; 2012 Feb; 6(2):193-202. PubMed ID: 22436176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.