These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

347 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27677565)

  • 1. Improved Functional Results After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Intrathoracic Versus Cervical Anastomosis.
    van Workum F; van der Maas J; van den Wildenberg FJ; Polat F; Kouwenhoven EA; van Det MJ; Nieuwenhuijzen GA; Luyer MD; Rosman C
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2017 Jan; 103(1):267-273. PubMed ID: 27677565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intrathoracic versus Cervical ANastomosis after minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: study protocol of the ICAN randomized controlled trial.
    van Workum F; Bouwense SA; Luyer MD; Nieuwenhuijzen GA; van der Peet DL; Daams F; Kouwenhoven EA; van Det MJ; van den Wildenberg FJ; Polat F; Gisbertz SS; Henegouwen MI; Heisterkamp J; Langenhoff BS; Martijnse IS; Grutters JP; Klarenbeek BR; Rovers MM; Rosman C
    Trials; 2016 Oct; 17(1):505. PubMed ID: 27756419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intrathoracic vs Cervical Anastomosis After Totally or Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    van Workum F; Verstegen MHP; Klarenbeek BR; Bouwense SAW; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Daams F; Gisbertz SS; Hannink G; Haveman JW; Heisterkamp J; Jansen W; Kouwenhoven EA; van Lanschot JJB; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; van der Peet DL; Polat F; Ubels S; Wijnhoven BPL; Rovers MM; Rosman C;
    JAMA Surg; 2021 Jul; 156(7):601-610. PubMed ID: 33978698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Application of cervical triangulating stapled anastomosis in minimally invasive esophagectomy].
    Tan L; Feng M; Shen Y; Wang H; Li J; Xi Y; Wang Q
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Sep; 17(9):869-71. PubMed ID: 25273652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A change in clinical practice: a partially stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis reduces morbidity and improves functional outcome after esophagectomy for cancer.
    Kondra J; Ong SR; Clifton J; Evans K; Finley RJ; Yee J
    Dis Esophagus; 2008; 21(5):422-9. PubMed ID: 19125796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Outcomes of cervical end-to-side triangulating esophagogastric anastomosis with minimally invasive esophagectomy.
    Nakata K; Nagai E; Ohuchida K; Nakamura K; Tanaka M
    World J Surg; 2015 May; 39(5):1099-104. PubMed ID: 25582767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Minimally invasive oesophagectomy: preliminary results after introduction of an intrathoracic anastomosis.
    van Workum F; van den Wildenberg FJ; Polat F; de Wilt JH; Rosman C
    Dig Surg; 2014; 31(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 24776753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparisons between minimally invasive and open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with cervical anastomosis: a retrospective study.
    Li Z; Liu C; Liu Y; Yao S; Xu B; Dong G
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Jun; 15(1):128. PubMed ID: 32513211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Techniques and short-term outcomes for total minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophageal resection in distal esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancers: pooled data from six European centers.
    Straatman J; van der Wielen N; Nieuwenhuijzen GA; Rosman C; Roig J; Scheepers JJ; Cuesta MA; Luyer MD; van Berge Henegouwen MI; van Workum F; Gisbertz SS; van der Peet DL
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Jan; 31(1):119-126. PubMed ID: 27129563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Utilizing a Stapled Side-to-Side Anastomosis is Safe in the Western Patient Population.
    Ben-David K; Tuttle R; Kukar M; Rossidis G; Hochwald SN
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Sep; 23(9):3056-62. PubMed ID: 27112585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modified Double-Layer Anastomosis for Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: An Effective Way to Prevent Leakage and Stricture.
    Yuan Y; Zeng XX; Zhao YF; Chen LQ
    World J Surg; 2017 Dec; 41(12):3164-3170. PubMed ID: 28721567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minimally invasive esophagectomy provides significant survival advantage compared with open or hybrid esophagectomy for patients with cancers of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction.
    Palazzo F; Rosato EL; Chaudhary A; Evans NR; Sendecki JA; Keith S; Chojnacki KA; Yeo CJ; Berger AC
    J Am Coll Surg; 2015 Apr; 220(4):672-9. PubMed ID: 25667145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: lessons learned from 104 operations.
    Nguyen NT; Hinojosa MW; Smith BR; Chang KJ; Gray J; Hoyt D
    Ann Surg; 2008 Dec; 248(6):1081-91. PubMed ID: 19092354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. FA01.03: USE OF 'NON-TUBE NO FASTING' ERAS PROTOCOL IN PATIENTS AFTER MIE WITH LI'S ANASTOMOSIS: OUTCOMES IN THE FIRST 113 PATIENTS PERFORMED BY A SURGEON AFTER TRAINING COURSE.
    Zhang R; Li Y; Liu S; Liu X; Sun H; Wang Z; Zheng Y; Chen X; Liu Q; Zhu Z; Xu L
    Dis Esophagus; 2018 Sep; 31(13):1-2. PubMed ID: 30219911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Comparison of Early Surgical Outcomes From The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database.
    Sihag S; Kosinski AS; Gaissert HA; Wright CD; Schipper PH
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Apr; 101(4):1281-8; discussion 1288-9. PubMed ID: 26704412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Totally minimally invasive two-stage esophagectomy with intrathoracic hand-sewn anastomosis: short-term clinical and oncological outcomes.
    Elshaer M; Gravante G; Tang CB; Jayanthi NV
    Dis Esophagus; 2018 Mar; 31(3):. PubMed ID: 29293970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Outcomes With Open and Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy After Neoadjuvant Therapy.
    Tapias LF; Mathisen DJ; Wright CD; Wain JC; Gaissert HA; Muniappan A; Lanuti M; Donahue DM; Morse CR
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Mar; 101(3):1097-103. PubMed ID: 26652140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Comparison of the stapled suture with the manual suture in the application of minimally invasive esophagectomy].
    Wang F; Liu S; Wang J; Chen X; Zheng Q; Wang Z; Xu J; Chen S
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Sep; 17(9):881-3. PubMed ID: 25273655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comprehensive review of anastomotic technique in 432 esophagectomies.
    Price TN; Nichols FC; Harmsen WS; Allen MS; Cassivi SD; Wigle DA; Shen KR; Deschamps C
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Apr; 95(4):1154-60; discussion 1160-1. PubMed ID: 23395626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Thoracoscopic side-to-side esophagogastrostomy by use of linear stapler-a simplified technique facilitating a minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis operation.
    Irino T; Tsai JA; Ericson J; Nilsson M; Lundell L; Rouvelas I
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2016 May; 401(3):315-22. PubMed ID: 26960591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.