These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27680319)

  • 21. Authors' Submission Toolkit: a practical guide to getting your research published.
    Chipperfield L; Citrome L; Clark J; David FS; Enck R; Evangelista M; Gonzalez J; Groves T; Magrann J; Mansi B; Miller C; Mooney LA; Murphy A; Shelton J; Walson PD; Weigel A
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2010 Aug; 26(8):1967-82. PubMed ID: 20569069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Preserving the Integrity of Citations and References by All Stakeholders of Science Communication.
    Gasparyan AY; Yessirkepov M; Voronov AA; Gerasimov AN; Kostyukova EI; Kitas GD
    J Korean Med Sci; 2015 Nov; 30(11):1545-52. PubMed ID: 26538996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Medical Student Journals: Teaching The Peer-Review Process and Promoting Academic Mentorship.
    Kaskas NM; Ballard DH; Weisman JA; Vanchiere JA
    J La State Med Soc; 2016; 168(5):166. PubMed ID: 27797347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Dissemination of scholarship across eight cohorts of doctor of nursing practice graduates.
    Becker KD; Johnson S; Rucker D; Finnell DS
    J Clin Nurs; 2018 Apr; 27(7-8):e1395-e1401. PubMed ID: 29274172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Writing for publication in medical education: the benefits of a faculty development workshop and peer writing group.
    Steinert Y; McLeod PJ; Liben S; Snell L
    Med Teach; 2008; 30(8):e280-5. PubMed ID: 18946816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A systematic review highlights a knowledge gap regarding the effectiveness of health-related training programs in journalology.
    Galipeau J; Moher D; Campbell C; Hendry P; Cameron DW; Palepu A; Hébert PC
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Mar; 68(3):257-65. PubMed ID: 25510373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A retrospective study investigating requests for self-citation during open peer review in a general medicine journal.
    Peebles E; Scandlyn M; Hesp BR
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0237804. PubMed ID: 32817699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The language of scholarship for novice writers.
    Freysteinson WM
    J Contin Educ Nurs; 2013 Dec; 44(12):533-4. PubMed ID: 24294894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Predatory publishing: What editors need to know.
    INANE Predatory Publishing Practices Collaborative
    CANNT J; 2015; 25(1):8-10. PubMed ID: 26882636
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Peer reviewing e-learning: opportunities, challenges, and solutions.
    Ruiz JG; Candler C; Teasdale TA
    Acad Med; 2007 May; 82(5):503-7. PubMed ID: 17457075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. European Medical Writers Association (EMWA) guidelines on the role of medical writers in developing peer-reviewed publications.
    Jacobs A; Wager E
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2005 Feb; 21(2):317-22. PubMed ID: 15802003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Eyes wide open: reader and author responsibility in understanding the limits of peer review.
    Benson PJ
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2015 Oct; 97(7):487-9. PubMed ID: 26414359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Peer review in the Croatian Medical Journal from 1992 to 1996.
    Marusić A; Mestrović T; Petrovecki M; Marusić M
    Croat Med J; 1998 Mar; 39(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 9475799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Writing peer-reviewed articles with diverse teams: considerations for novice scholars conducting community-engaged research.
    Flicker S; Nixon SA
    Health Promot Int; 2018 Feb; 33(1):152-161. PubMed ID: 27476871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Rebound peer review: a viable recourse for aggrieved authors?
    Sen CK
    Antioxid Redox Signal; 2012 Feb; 16(4):293-6. PubMed ID: 22098370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A comparison of reports from referees chosen by authors or journal editors in the peer review process.
    Earnshaw JJ; Farndon JR; Guillou PJ; Johnson CD; Murie JA; Murray GD
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2000 Apr; 82(4 Suppl):133-5. PubMed ID: 10889776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Rewarding reviewers, tracking our authors and selective electronic publication.
    Harris JP
    ANZ J Surg; 2017 Apr; 87(4):217-218. PubMed ID: 28371034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Gender Disparity in Authorship of Peer-Reviewed Medical Publications.
    Bernardi K; Lyons NB; Huang L; Holihan JL; Olavarria OA; Martin AC; Milton AN; Loor MM; Zheng F; Tyson JE; Ko TC; Liang MK
    Am J Med Sci; 2020 Nov; 360(5):511-516. PubMed ID: 31955814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Problems faced by editors of peer reviewed medical journals.
    Jawaid SA
    Saudi Med J; 2004 Jan; 25(1 Suppl):S21-5. PubMed ID: 14968187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Same review quality in open versus blinded peer review in "Ugeskrift for Læger".
    Vinther S; Nielsen OH; Rosenberg J; Keiding N; Schroeder TV
    Dan Med J; 2012 Aug; 59(8):A4479. PubMed ID: 22849979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.