These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27680896)

  • 21. A comparison of confidence interval methods for the intraclass correlation coefficient in community-based cluster randomization trials with a binary outcome.
    Braschel MC; Svec I; Darlington GA; Donner A
    Clin Trials; 2016 Apr; 13(2):180-7. PubMed ID: 26415500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Impact of non-uniform correlation structure on sample size and power in multiple-period cluster randomised trials.
    Kasza J; Hemming K; Hooper R; Matthews J; Forbes AB
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Mar; 28(3):703-716. PubMed ID: 29027505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Intracluster correlation adjustments to maintain power in cluster trials for binary outcomes.
    Chakraborty H; Moore J; Hartwell TD
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2009 Sep; 30(5):473-80. PubMed ID: 19386285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Intra-cluster and inter-period correlation coefficients for cross-sectional cluster randomised controlled trials for type-2 diabetes in UK primary care.
    Martin J; Girling A; Nirantharakumar K; Ryan R; Marshall T; Hemming K
    Trials; 2016 Aug; 17():402. PubMed ID: 27524396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Repairing the efficiency loss due to varying cluster sizes in two-level two-armed randomized trials with heterogeneous clustering.
    Candel MJ; Van Breukelen GJ
    Stat Med; 2016 May; 35(12):2000-15. PubMed ID: 26756696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Imputation strategies for missing binary outcomes in cluster randomized trials.
    Ma J; Akhtar-Danesh N; Dolovich L; Thabane L;
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 Feb; 11():18. PubMed ID: 21324148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Missing binary outcomes under covariate-dependent missingness in cluster randomised trials.
    Hossain A; DiazOrdaz K; Bartlett JW
    Stat Med; 2017 Aug; 36(19):3092-3109. PubMed ID: 28557022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. GEEMAEE: A SAS macro for the analysis of correlated outcomes based on GEE and finite-sample adjustments with application to cluster randomized trials.
    Zhang Y; Preisser JS; Li F; Turner EL; Toles M; Rathouz PJ
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2023 Mar; 230():107362. PubMed ID: 36709555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Sample size determinations for stepped-wedge clinical trials from a three-level data hierarchy perspective.
    Heo M; Kim N; Rinke ML; Wylie-Rosett J
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Feb; 27(2):480-489. PubMed ID: 26988927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Analysing cluster randomised controlled trials using GLMM, GEE1, GEE2, and QIF: results from four case studies.
    Offorha BC; Walters SJ; Jacques RM
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Dec; 23(1):293. PubMed ID: 38093221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The quality of reporting in cluster randomised crossover trials: proposal for reporting items and an assessment of reporting quality.
    Arnup SJ; Forbes AB; Kahan BC; Morgan KE; McKenzie JE
    Trials; 2016 Dec; 17(1):575. PubMed ID: 27923384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Imputation strategies for missing continuous outcomes in cluster randomized trials.
    Taljaard M; Donner A; Klar N
    Biom J; 2008 Jun; 50(3):329-45. PubMed ID: 18537126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Analysis of cluster randomized cross-over trial data: a comparison of methods.
    Turner RM; White IR; Croudace T;
    Stat Med; 2007 Jan; 26(2):274-89. PubMed ID: 16538700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The cluster randomized crossover trial: The effects of attrition in the AB/BA design and how to account for it in sample size calculations.
    Moerbeek M
    Clin Trials; 2020 Aug; 17(4):420-429. PubMed ID: 32191129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A comparison of the statistical power of different methods for the analysis of cluster randomization trials with binary outcomes.
    Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2007 Aug; 26(19):3550-65. PubMed ID: 17238238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Performance of analytical methods for overdispersed counts in cluster randomized trials: sample size, degree of clustering and imbalance.
    Durán Pacheco G; Hattendorf J; Colford JM; Mäusezahl D; Smith T
    Stat Med; 2009 Oct; 28(24):2989-3011. PubMed ID: 19672840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Use of the bootstrap in analysing cost data from cluster randomised trials: some simulation results.
    Flynn TN; Peters TJ
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2004 Nov; 4(1):33. PubMed ID: 15550169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Changing cluster composition in cluster randomised controlled trials: design and analysis considerations.
    Corrigan N; Bankart MJ; Gray LJ; Smith KL
    Trials; 2014 May; 15():184. PubMed ID: 24884591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Maintaining the validity of inference in small-sample stepped wedge cluster randomized trials with binary outcomes when using generalized estimating equations.
    Ford WP; Westgate PM
    Stat Med; 2020 Sep; 39(21):2779-2792. PubMed ID: 32578264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Longitudinal and repeated cross-sectional cluster-randomization designs using mixed effects regression for binary outcomes: bias and coverage of frequentist and Bayesian methods.
    Localio AR; Berlin JA; Have TR
    Stat Med; 2006 Aug; 25(16):2720-36. PubMed ID: 16345043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.