These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27680954)

  • 1. Function-based classification for stroke rehabilitation and issues of reimbursement: Using patient classification systems to scale payment to patient complexity.
    Stineman MG
    Top Stroke Rehabil; 1994 Sep; 1(3):40-50. PubMed ID: 27680954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Application of functional independence measure-function related groups and resource utilization groups-version III systems across post acute settings.
    Eilertsen TB; Kramer AM; Schlenker RE; Hrincevich CA
    Med Care; 1998 May; 36(5):695-705. PubMed ID: 9596060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of functional status measures for payment of medical rehabilitation services.
    Wilkerson DL; Batavia AI; DeJong G
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1992 Feb; 73(2):111-20. PubMed ID: 1543404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Classifying rehabilitation inpatients by expected functional gain.
    Stineman MG; Goin JE; Tassoni CJ; Granger CV; Williams SV
    Med Care; 1997 Sep; 35(9):963-73. PubMed ID: 9298084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rehabilitation fees, length of stay and efficiency for hospitalized stroke patients: a preliminary study based on function-related groups.
    Lin JH; Hsiao SF; Liu CK; Lin YT
    Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2001 Sep; 17(9):475-83. PubMed ID: 11842651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A case-mix classification system for medical rehabilitation.
    Stineman MG; Escarce JJ; Goin JE; Hamilton BB; Granger CV; Williams SV
    Med Care; 1994 Apr; 32(4):366-79. PubMed ID: 8139301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development of function-related groups version 2.0: a classification system for medical rehabilitation.
    Stineman MG; Tassoni CJ; Escarce JJ; Goin JE; Granger CV; Fiedler RC; Williams SV
    Health Serv Res; 1997 Oct; 32(4):529-48. PubMed ID: 9327817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prospective payment, prospective challenge.
    Stineman MG
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2002 Dec; 83(12):1802-5. PubMed ID: 12474191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Four methods for characterizing disability in the formation of function related groups.
    Stineman MG; Hamilton BB; Granger CV; Goin JE; Escarce JJ; Williams SV
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1994 Dec; 75(12):1277-83. PubMed ID: 7993164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development of a resource-based patient classification scheme for rehabilitation.
    Harada N; Kominski G; Sofaer S
    Inquiry; 1993; 30(1):54-63. PubMed ID: 8454315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Medicare program; inpatient rehabilitation facility prospective payment system for federal fiscal year 2012; changes in size and square footage of inpatient rehabilitation units and inpatient psychiatric units. Final rule.
    Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS
    Fed Regist; 2011 Aug; 76(151):47836-915. PubMed ID: 21818878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Variation in patient routine costliness in U.S. psychiatric facilities.
    Cromwell J; Drozd EM; Gage B; Maier J; Richter E; Goldman HH
    J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2005 Mar; 8(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 15870482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measuring casemix, severity, and complexity in geriatric patients undergoing rehabilitation.
    Stineman MG
    Med Care; 1997 Jun; 35(6 Suppl):JS90-105; discussion JS106-12. PubMed ID: 9191719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Prospective payment in medical rehabilitation].
    Lüngen M; Lauterbach KW
    Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2003 Jun; 42(3):136-42. PubMed ID: 12813650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The story of function-related groups--please, first do no harm.
    Stineman MG
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2001 Apr; 82(4):553-7. PubMed ID: 11295021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating the planned substitution of the minimum data set-post acute care for use in the rehabilitation hospital prospective payment system.
    Buchanan JL; Andres PL; Haley SM; Paddock SM; Zaslavsky AM
    Med Care; 2004 Feb; 42(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 14734953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of Medicare's payment system for rehabilitation hospitals on length of stay, charges, and total payments.
    Chan L; Koepsell TD; Deyo RA; Esselman PC; Haselkorn JK; Lowery JK; Stolov WC
    N Engl J Med; 1997 Oct; 337(14):978-85. PubMed ID: 9309104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Provisions of the Balanced Budget Act challenge IDS care coordination patterns.
    Rovinsky M
    Healthc Financ Manage; 1999 Aug; 53(8):31-4. PubMed ID: 10557797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Coding response to a case-mix measurement system based on multiple diagnoses.
    Preyra C
    Health Serv Res; 2004 Aug; 39(4 Pt 1):1027-45. PubMed ID: 15230940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnosis-related groups for stroke in Europe: patient classification and hospital reimbursement in 11 countries.
    Peltola M; Quentin W
    Cerebrovasc Dis; 2013; 35(2):113-23. PubMed ID: 23406838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.