These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27681252)

  • 1. Is bioresorbable vascular scaffold acute recoil affected by baseline renal function and scaffold selection?
    Gunes HM; Yılmaz FK; Gokdeniz T; Demir GG; Guler E; Guler GB; Karaca O; Cakal B; İbişoğlu E; Boztosun B
    Int J Cardiol; 2016 Dec; 224():388-393. PubMed ID: 27681252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Incidence and short-term clinical outcomes of small side branch occlusion after implantation of an everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold: an interim report of 435 patients in the ABSORB-EXTEND single-arm trial in comparison with an everolimus-eluting metallic stent in the SPIRIT first and II trials.
    Muramatsu T; Onuma Y; García-García HM; Farooq V; Bourantas CV; Morel MA; Li X; Veldhof S; Bartorelli A; Whitbourn R; Abizaid A; Serruys PW;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Mar; 6(3):247-57. PubMed ID: 23517836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A bioresorbable everolimus-eluting scaffold versus a metallic everolimus-eluting stent for ischaemic heart disease caused by de-novo native coronary artery lesions (ABSORB II): an interim 1-year analysis of clinical and procedural secondary outcomes from a randomised controlled trial.
    Serruys PW; Chevalier B; Dudek D; Cequier A; Carrié D; Iniguez A; Dominici M; van der Schaaf RJ; Haude M; Wasungu L; Veldhof S; Peng L; Staehr P; Grundeken MJ; Ishibashi Y; Garcia-Garcia HM; Onuma Y
    Lancet; 2015 Jan; 385(9962):43-54. PubMed ID: 25230593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Real-World Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Experience Compared With Second-Generation Metallic Drug-Eluting Stents in Complex Coronary Lesions.
    Okamoto N; Ueda H; Yoshimura T; Chamaria S; Bhatheja S; Vengrenyuk Y; Rabiei S; Barrientos Y; Kapur V; Barman N; Sweeny J; Baber U; Mehran R; Sharma SK; Kini AS
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2018 Jul; 30(7):251-255. PubMed ID: 29656280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Incidence and imaging outcomes of acute scaffold disruption and late structural discontinuity after implantation of the absorb Everolimus-Eluting fully bioresorbable vascular scaffold: optical coherence tomography assessment in the ABSORB cohort B Trial (A Clinical Evaluation of the Bioabsorbable Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions).
    Onuma Y; Serruys PW; Muramatsu T; Nakatani S; van Geuns RJ; de Bruyne B; Dudek D; Christiansen E; Smits PC; Chevalier B; McClean D; Koolen J; Windecker S; Whitbourn R; Meredith I; Garcia-Garcia HM; Veldhof S; Rapoza R; Ormiston JA
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Dec; 7(12):1400-11. PubMed ID: 25523532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mechanical properties of the everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold compared to the metallic everolimus-eluting stent.
    Dalos D; Gangl C; Roth C; Krenn L; Scherzer S; Vertesich M; Lang I; Maurer G; Neunteufl T; Berger R; Delle-Karth G
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2016 May; 16():104. PubMed ID: 27225486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of early clinical outcomes between ABSORB bioresorbable vascular scaffold and everolimus-eluting stent implantation in a real-world population.
    Costopoulos C; Latib A; Naganuma T; Miyazaki T; Sato K; Figini F; Sticchi A; Carlino M; Chieffo A; Montorfano M; Colombo A
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Jan; 85(1):E10-5. PubMed ID: 24909303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of in vivo acute stent recoil between the bioresorbable everolimus-eluting coronary scaffolds (revision 1.0 and 1.1) and the metallic everolimus-eluting stent.
    Onuma Y; Serruys PW; Gomez J; de Bruyne B; Dudek D; Thuesen L; Smits P; Chevalier B; McClean D; Koolen J; Windecker S; Whitbourn R; Meredith I; Garcia-Garcia H; Ormiston JA;
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Jul; 78(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 21413120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does optimal lesion preparation reduce the amount of acute recoil of the Absorbe BVS? Insights from a real-world population.
    Danzi GB; Sesana M; Arieti M; Villa G; Rutigliano S; Aprile A; Nicolino A; Moshiri S; Valenti R
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Nov; 86(6):984-91. PubMed ID: 26268401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Head-to-head comparison of the neointimal response between metallic and bioresorbable everolimus-eluting scaffolds using optical coherence tomography.
    Gomez-Lara J; Brugaletta S; Farooq V; Onuma Y; Diletti R; Windecker S; Thuesen L; McClean D; Koolen J; Whitbourn R; Dudek D; Smits PC; Chevalier B; Regar E; Veldhof S; Rapoza R; Ormiston JA; Garcia-Garcia HM; Serruys PW
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Dec; 4(12):1271-80. PubMed ID: 22192368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Five-year clinical and functional multislice computed tomography angiographic results after coronary implantation of the fully resorbable polymeric everolimus-eluting scaffold in patients with de novo coronary artery disease: the ABSORB cohort A trial.
    Onuma Y; Dudek D; Thuesen L; Webster M; Nieman K; Garcia-Garcia HM; Ormiston JA; Serruys PW
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Oct; 6(10):999-1009. PubMed ID: 24156961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. ABSORB II randomized controlled trial: a clinical evaluation to compare the safety, efficacy, and performance of the Absorb everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold system against the XIENCE everolimus-eluting coronary stent system in the treatment of subjects with ischemic heart disease caused by de novo native coronary artery lesions: rationale and study design.
    Diletti R; Serruys PW; Farooq V; Sudhir K; Dorange C; Miquel-Hebert K; Veldhof S; Rapoza R; Onuma Y; Garcia-Garcia HM; Chevalier B
    Am Heart J; 2012 Nov; 164(5):654-63. PubMed ID: 23137495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bioresorbable Scaffold for Treatment of Coronary Artery Lesions: Intravascular Ultrasound Results From the ABSORB Japan Trial.
    Okada K; Honda Y; Kitahara H; Otagiri K; Tanaka S; Hollak MB; Yock PG; Popma JJ; Kusano H; Cheong WF; Sudhir K; Fitzgerald PJ; Kimura T;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Apr; 11(7):648-661. PubMed ID: 29622143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds Versus Metallic Stents in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: ABSORB China Trial.
    Gao R; Yang Y; Han Y; Huo Y; Chen J; Yu B; Su X; Li L; Kuo HC; Ying SW; Cheong WF; Zhang Y; Su X; Xu B; Popma JJ; Stone GW;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2015 Dec; 66(21):2298-2309. PubMed ID: 26471805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. ABSORB biodegradable stents versus second-generation metal stents: a comparison study of 100 complex lesions treated under OCT guidance.
    Mattesini A; Secco GG; Dall'Ara G; Ghione M; Rama-Merchan JC; Lupi A; Viceconte N; Lindsay AC; De Silva R; Foin N; Naganuma T; Valente S; Colombo A; Di Mario C
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jul; 7(7):741-50. PubMed ID: 25060016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Angiographic geometric changes of the lumen arterial wall after bioresorbable vascular scaffolds and metallic platform stents at 1-year follow-up.
    Gomez-Lara J; Brugaletta S; Farooq V; van Geuns RJ; De Bruyne B; Windecker S; McClean D; Thuesen L; Dudek D; Koolen J; Whitbourn R; Smits PC; Chevalier B; Morel MA; Dorange C; Veldhof S; Rapoza R; Garcia-Garcia HM; Ormiston JA; Serruys PW
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Jul; 4(7):789-99. PubMed ID: 21777888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bioresorbable vascular scaffold thrombosis in a consecutive cohort of 550 patients.
    Tröbs M; Achenbach S; Röther J; Klinghammer L; Schlundt C
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Nov; 88(6):872-880. PubMed ID: 27142643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of the conformability of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds to metal platform coronary stents.
    Gomez-Lara J; Garcia-Garcia HM; Onuma Y; Garg S; Regar E; De Bruyne B; Windecker S; McClean D; Thuesen L; Dudek D; Koolen J; Whitbourn R; Smits PC; Chevalier B; Dorange C; Veldhof S; Morel MA; de Vries T; Ormiston JA; Serruys PW
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Nov; 3(11):1190-8. PubMed ID: 21087756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Acutely malapposed bioresorbable vascular scaffold during primary angioplasty for spontaneous coronary artery dissection: Is a no-metal strategy better?
    Cortese B; Buccheri D
    Int J Cardiol; 2016 Dec; 224():335-336. PubMed ID: 27668707
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of strut thickness on acute mechanical performance: A comparison study using optical coherence tomography between DESolve 150 and DESolve 100.
    Boeder NF; Dörr O; Bauer T; Mattesini A; Elsässer A; Liebetrau C; Achenbach S; Hamm CW; Nef HM
    Int J Cardiol; 2017 Nov; 246():74-79. PubMed ID: 28579164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.