454 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27681700)
21. Tone-burst and click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in subjects with hearing loss above 0.25, 0.5, and 1 kHz.
Jedrzejczak WW; Kochanek K; Trzaskowski B; Pilka E; Skarzynski PH; Skarzynski H
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(6):757-67. PubMed ID: 22710662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Stimulus ratio dependence of low-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans.
Christensen AT; Ordoñez R; Hammershøi D
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):679-89. PubMed ID: 25698003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emission (DPOAE) Growth in Aging Ears with Clinically Normal Behavioral Thresholds.
Glavin CC; Siegel J; Dhar S
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2021 Dec; 22(6):659-680. PubMed ID: 34591199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The Spatial Origins of Cochlear Amplification Assessed by Stimulus-Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions.
Goodman SS; Lee C; Guinan JJ; Lichtenhan JT
Biophys J; 2020 Mar; 118(5):1183-1195. PubMed ID: 31968228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Sources of DPOAEs revealed by suppression experiments, inverse fast Fourier transforms, and SFOAEs in impaired ears.
Konrad-Martin D; Neely ST; Keefe DH; Dorn PA; Cyr E; Gorga MP
J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Apr; 111(4):1800-9. PubMed ID: 12002864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Otoacoustic emissions and recruitment].
Konopka W; Olszewski J
Otolaryngol Pol; 2005; 59(5):731-6. PubMed ID: 16471192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The influence of common stimulus parameters on distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure.
Johnson TA; Baranowski LG
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 21918451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Swept-tone stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions: Normative data and methodological considerations.
Abdala C; Guardia YC; Shera CA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Jan; 143(1):181. PubMed ID: 29390734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Frequency responses of two- and three-tone distortion product otoacoustic emissions in Mongolian gerbils.
Mills DM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 May; 107(5 Pt 1):2586-602. PubMed ID: 10830382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effects of negative middle ear pressure on distortion product otoacoustic emissions and application of a compensation procedure in humans.
Sun XM; Shaver MD
Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):191-202. PubMed ID: 19194291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Swept-Tone Stimulus-Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions in Human Newborns.
Abdala C; Luo P; Guardia Y
Trends Hear; 2019; 23():2331216519889226. PubMed ID: 31789131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Association Between Nonoptimal Blood Pressure and Cochlear Function.
Baiduc RR; Ramsey M; Sanders A; Vance EA
Ear Hear; 2021; 42(2):393-404. PubMed ID: 32826511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Reflection- and Distortion-Source Otoacoustic Emissions: Evidence for Increased Irregularity in the Human Cochlea During Aging.
Abdala C; Ortmann AJ; Shera CA
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2018 Oct; 19(5):493-510. PubMed ID: 29968098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Suppression of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.
Brass D; Kemp DT
J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Feb; 93(2):920-39. PubMed ID: 8445127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Use of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission latency and level to investigate cochlear mechanics in human ears.
Schairer KS; Ellison JC; Fitzpatrick D; Keefe DH
J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Aug; 120(2):901-14. PubMed ID: 16938978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Possibility for quantitative and frequency-specific assessment of auditory threshold with otoacoustic emissions].
Dreher A; Suckfüll M; Schneeweiss S; Schorn K
Laryngorhinootologie; 1997 Jan; 76(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 9156504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Extended High-frequency Hearing Impairment Despite a Normal Audiogram: Relation to Early Aging, Speech-in-noise Perception, Cochlear Function, and Routine Earphone Use.
Mishra SK; Saxena U; Rodrigo H
Ear Hear; 2022; 43(3):822-835. PubMed ID: 34700326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Interrelations between transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions, spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and acoustic distortion products in normally hearing subjects.
Moulin A; Collet L; Veuillet E; Morgon A
Hear Res; 1993 Feb; 65(1-2):216-33. PubMed ID: 8458753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Children with autism spectrum disorder have reduced otoacoustic emissions at the 1 kHz mid-frequency region.
Bennetto L; Keith JM; Allen PD; Luebke AE
Autism Res; 2017 Feb; 10(2):337-345. PubMed ID: 27404771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in an industrial setting.
Korres GS; Balatsouras DG; Tzagaroulakis A; Kandiloros D; Ferekidou E; Korres S
Noise Health; 2009; 11(43):103-10. PubMed ID: 19414930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
