These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Treatment variations of IMPA in relation to extraction areas, and the class of malocclusion. Horn AJ J Charles H. Tweed Int Found; 1982 Apr; 10():30-4. PubMed ID: 6962229 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The lower lip and the maxillary central incisor. Luffingham JK Eur J Orthod; 1982 Nov; 4(4):263-8. PubMed ID: 6959817 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Ideal position of the lower incisor in 3 dimensions (according to the Cagliari school)]. Tenti FV Orthod Fr; 1977; 48():63-71. PubMed ID: 276832 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Lip curve changes in males with premolar extraction or nonextraction treatment. Lin PT; Woods MG Aust Orthod J; 2004 Nov; 20(2):71-86. PubMed ID: 16429877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A cephalometric study of cranial, mandibular, and lower incisor morphology in the adult face. Metzdorf DW Angle Orthod; 1977 Oct; 47(4):288-92. PubMed ID: 270297 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Relating the incisors to points A and B in cephalometric, model, and clinical analysis. Madsen R; Escobar PP; Torres L; Sandoval P J Clin Orthod; 2001 May; 35(5):315-20. PubMed ID: 11475541 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability of soft-tissue profile in cephalometrics. Hillesund E; Fjeld D; Zachrisson BU Am J Orthod; 1978 Nov; 74(5):537-50. PubMed ID: 281868 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Analytical study of well-treated maxillary protrusion--morphological differences between the extraction and non-extraction cases]. Tanaka S; Negoro T; Ikemori Y; Miyajima K; Goto S; Kajimwara T Aichi Gakuin Daigaku Shigakkai Shi; 1985 Jun; 23(2):494-507. PubMed ID: 3867295 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The importance of incisor positioning in the esthetic smile: the smile arc. Sarver DM Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Aug; 120(2):98-111. PubMed ID: 11500650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Variations in the inter-incisor angle as a function of skeletal type]. Gabet F Orthod Fr; 1973; 44(1):391-405. PubMed ID: 4534429 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Position of lower incisors and molars according to the vertical and antero-posterior relations of the skeletal base]. Casteigt J; Beillard F; Dorignac D Orthod Fr; 1977; 48():9-19. PubMed ID: 276835 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Soft-tissue profile changes in class II treatment. Roos N Am J Orthod; 1977 Aug; 72(2):165-75. PubMed ID: 268147 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Vertical growth of the lips: a serial cephalometric study. Vig PS; Cohen AM Am J Orthod; 1979 Apr; 75(4):405-15. PubMed ID: 285616 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Position of the lower incisor. Its correlation with electromyographic data of the anterior encircling muscles of the face]. Bertrand-Brangier N; Darque J Orthod Fr; 1977; 48():35-43. PubMed ID: 276829 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of facial form. Eastwood AW Dent Clin North Am; 1978 Oct; 22(4):539-55. PubMed ID: 279476 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Changes in soft tissue profile after surgical correction of skeletal class III malocclusion. Kajikawa Y J Oral Surg; 1979 Mar; 37(3):167-74. PubMed ID: 283217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The depth of the sulcus of the upper lip--a cephalometric study. Galvao CA; Madeira MC Aust Orthod J; 1981 Dec; 7(2):67-9. PubMed ID: 6956323 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]