BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27683197)

  • 1. Observational evidence that maladaptive gene flow reduces patch occupancy in a wild insect metapopulation.
    Farkas TE; Mononen T; Comeault AA; Nosil P
    Evolution; 2016 Dec; 70(12):2879-2888. PubMed ID: 27683197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evolution of camouflage drives rapid ecological change in an insect community.
    Farkas TE; Mononen T; Comeault AA; Hanski I; Nosil P
    Curr Biol; 2013 Oct; 23(19):1835-43. PubMed ID: 24055155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Metapopulation responses to patch connectivity and quality are masked by successional habitat dynamics.
    Hodgson JA; Moilanen A; Thomas CD
    Ecology; 2009 Jun; 90(6):1608-19. PubMed ID: 19569375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Disentangling the role of seed bank and dispersal in plant metapopulation dynamics using patch occupancy surveys.
    Manna F; Pradel R; Choquet R; Fréville H; Cheptou PO
    Ecology; 2017 Oct; 98(10):2662-2672. PubMed ID: 28734092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The relative importance of local and regional processes to metapopulation dynamics.
    Dallas TA; Saastamoinen M; Schulz T; Ovaskainen O
    J Anim Ecol; 2020 Mar; 89(3):884-896. PubMed ID: 31705670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Eco-evolutionary feedbacks following changes in spatial connectedness.
    Bonte D; Masier S; Mortier F
    Curr Opin Insect Sci; 2018 Oct; 29():64-70. PubMed ID: 30551827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Eco-evolutionary dynamics in a changing world.
    Hanski I
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2012 Feb; 1249():1-17. PubMed ID: 22335524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Metapopulation dynamics on ephemeral patches.
    Reigada C; Schreiber SJ; Altermatt F; Holyoak M
    Am Nat; 2015 Feb; 185(2):183-95. PubMed ID: 25616138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Network topology and patch connectivity affect dynamics in experimental and model metapopulations.
    Arancibia PA; Morin PJ
    J Anim Ecol; 2022 Feb; 91(2):496-505. PubMed ID: 34873688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Human-mediated dispersal and disturbance shape the metapopulation dynamics of a long-lived herb.
    Bullock JM; Wichmann MC; Hails RS; Hodgson DJ; Alexander MJ; Morley K; Knopp T; Ridding LE; Hooftman DAP
    Ecology; 2020 Aug; 101(8):e03087. PubMed ID: 32320472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Species traits, patch turnover and successional dynamics: when does intermediate disturbance favour metapopulation occupancy?
    Mestre F; Pita R; Mira A; Beja P
    BMC Ecol; 2020 Jan; 20(1):2. PubMed ID: 31900154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Eco-evolutionary metapopulation dynamics and the spatial scale of adaptation.
    Hanski I; Mononen T; Ovaskainen O
    Am Nat; 2011 Jan; 177(1):29-43. PubMed ID: 21090992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Enhancing the area-isolation paradigm: habitat heterogeneity and metapopulation dynamics of a rare wetland mammal.
    Schooley RL; Branch LC
    Ecol Appl; 2009 Oct; 19(7):1708-22. PubMed ID: 19831065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does gene flow constrain adaptive divergence or vice versa? A test using ecomorphology and sexual isolation in Timema cristinae walking-sticks.
    Nosil P; Crespi BJ
    Evolution; 2004 Jan; 58(1):102-12. PubMed ID: 15058723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predators modify biogeographic constraints on species distributions in an insect metacommunity.
    Grainger TN; Germain RM; Jones NT; Gilbert B
    Ecology; 2017 Mar; 98(3):851-860. PubMed ID: 28036097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Eco-evolutionary spatial dynamics in the Glanville fritillary butterfly.
    Hanski IA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 Aug; 108(35):14397-404. PubMed ID: 21788506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Anthropogenic landscape change promotes asymmetric dispersal and limits regional patch occupancy in a spatially structured bird population.
    Pavlacky DC; Possingham HP; Lowe AJ; Prentis PJ; Green DJ; Goldizen AW
    J Anim Ecol; 2012 Sep; 81(5):940-52. PubMed ID: 22489927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intermediate disturbance in experimental landscapes improves persistence of beetle metapopulations.
    Govindan BN; Feng Z; DeWoody YD; Swihart RK
    Ecology; 2015 Mar; 96(3):728-36. PubMed ID: 26236869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Explaining abundance-occupancy relationships in specialists and generalists: a case study on aquatic macroinvertebrates in standing waters.
    Verberk WC; van der Velde G; Esselink H
    J Anim Ecol; 2010 May; 79(3):589-601. PubMed ID: 20202007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of rotational shepherding on demographic and genetic connectivity of calcareous grassland plants.
    Rico Y; Boehmer HJ; Wagner HH
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Apr; 28(2):467-77. PubMed ID: 24299200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.