These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27684956)

  • 21. Crossed hands and the SNARC effect: a failure to replicate Dehaene, Bossini and Giraux (1993).
    Wood G; Nuerk HC; Willmes K
    Cortex; 2006 Nov; 42(8):1069-79; discussion 1119-23. PubMed ID: 17209413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The influence of semantic processing and response latency on the SNARC effect.
    Didino D; Breil C; Knops A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 May; 196():75-86. PubMed ID: 31004938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Implicit response-irrelevant number information triggers the SNARC effect: evidence using a neural overlap paradigm.
    Mitchell T; Bull R; Cleland AA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(10):1945-61. PubMed ID: 22524699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Processing stage flexibility of the SNARC effect: Task relevance or magnitude relevance?
    Xiang X; Yan L; Fu S; Nan W
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():1022999. PubMed ID: 36438366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Perceiving numbers does not cause automatic shifts of spatial attention.
    Fattorini E; Pinto M; Rotondaro F; Doricchi F
    Cortex; 2015 Dec; 73():298-316. PubMed ID: 26520681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Mechanism of the SNARC Effect in Numerical Magnitude, Time Sequence, and Spatial Sequence Tasks: Involvement of LTM and WM.
    Wang Q; Liu M; Shi W; Kang J
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1558. PubMed ID: 30186215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Spatial Representation of Ordinal Information.
    Zhang M; Gao X; Li B; Yu S; Gong T; Jiang T; Hu Q; Chen Y
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():505. PubMed ID: 27092100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Finding the spatial-numerical association of response codes (SNARC) in signed numbers: notational effects in accessing number representation.
    Chinello A; de Hevia MD; Geraci C; Girelli L
    Funct Neurol; 2012; 27(3):177-85. PubMed ID: 23402679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Electrophysiological evidence for notation independence in numerical processing.
    Libertus ME; Woldorff MG; Brannon EM
    Behav Brain Funct; 2007 Jan; 3():1. PubMed ID: 17214890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The Instructional Dependency of SNARC Effects Reveals Flexibility of the Space-Magnitude Association of Nonsymbolic and Symbolic Magnitudes.
    Lee D; Chun J; Cho S
    Perception; 2016 May; 45(5):552-67. PubMed ID: 27151510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Spatial-Numerical and Ordinal Positional Associations Coexist in Parallel.
    Huber S; Klein E; Moeller K; Willmes K
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():438. PubMed ID: 27064216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Further evidence that the SNARC effect is processed along a dual-route architecture: Evidence from the lateralized readiness potential.
    Gevers W; Ratinckx E; De Baene W; Fias W
    Exp Psychol; 2006; 53(1):58-68. PubMed ID: 16610273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) reveals a dissociation between SNARC and MARC effects: Implication for the polarity correspondence account.
    Di Rosa E; Bardi L; Umiltà C; Masina F; Forgione M; Mapelli D
    Cortex; 2017 Aug; 93():68-78. PubMed ID: 28623718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Exploring the interactions among SNARC effect, finger counting direction and embodied cognition.
    Prete G; Tommasi L
    PeerJ; 2020; 8():e9155. PubMed ID: 32435547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Holistic or compositional representation of two-digit numbers? Evidence from the distance, magnitude, and SNARC effects in a number-matching task.
    Zhou X; Chen C; Chen L; Dong Q
    Cognition; 2008 Mar; 106(3):1525-36. PubMed ID: 17707788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Spatial structure of quantitative representation of numbers: evidence from the SNARC effect.
    Ito Y; Hatta T
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Jun; 32(4):662-73. PubMed ID: 15478760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Non-symbolic and symbolic notations in simple arithmetic differentially involve intraparietal sulcus and angular gyrus activity.
    van der Ven F; Takashima A; Segers E; Fernández G; Verhoeven L
    Brain Res; 2016 Jul; 1643():91-102. PubMed ID: 27117869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Grammatical number elicits SNARC and MARC effects as a function of task demands.
    Roettger TB; Domahs F
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(6):1231-48. PubMed ID: 25384199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Non-symbolic and symbolic number lines are dissociated.
    He X; Guo P; Li S; Shen X; Zhou X
    Cogn Process; 2021 Aug; 22(3):475-486. PubMed ID: 33751283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Unimanual SNARC Effect: Hand Matters.
    Riello M; Rusconi E
    Front Psychol; 2011; 2():372. PubMed ID: 22207856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.