These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27685017)

  • 21. Prediction of bone strength by μCT and MDCT-based finite-element-models: how much spatial resolution is needed?
    Bauer JS; Sidorenko I; Mueller D; Baum T; Issever AS; Eckstein F; Rummeny EJ; Link TM; Raeth CW
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jan; 83(1):e36-42. PubMed ID: 24274992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Experimental validation of numerically predicted strain and micromotion in intact and implanted composite hemi-pelvises.
    Ghosh R; Gupta S; Dickinson A; Browne M
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2013 Feb; 227(2):162-74. PubMed ID: 23513987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Finite element study of human pelvis model in side impact for Chinese adult occupants.
    Ma Z; Lan F; Chen J; Liu W
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16(4):409-17. PubMed ID: 25133596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Finite-element modeling of bones from CT data: sensitivity to geometry and material uncertainties.
    Taddei F; Martelli S; Reggiani B; Cristofolini L; Viceconti M
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Nov; 53(11):2194-200. PubMed ID: 17073324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Liver tissue characterization from uniaxial stress-strain data using probabilistic and inverse finite element methods.
    Fu YB; Chui CK; Teo CL
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2013 Apr; 20():105-12. PubMed ID: 23455167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reliable simulations of the human proximal femur by high-order finite element analysis validated by experimental observations.
    Yosibash Z; Trabelsi N; Milgrom C
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(16):3688-99. PubMed ID: 17706228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Contribution of inter-site variations in architecture to trabecular bone apparent yield strains.
    Morgan EF; Bayraktar HH; Yeh OC; Majumdar S; Burghardt A; Keaveny TM
    J Biomech; 2004 Sep; 37(9):1413-20. PubMed ID: 15275849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Finite element model development of a child pelvis with optimization-based material identification.
    Kim JE; Li Z; Ito Y; Huber CD; Shih AM; Eberhardt AW; Yang KH; King AI; Soni BK
    J Biomech; 2009 Sep; 42(13):2191-5. PubMed ID: 19646702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Quantifying the Effects of Formalin Fixation on the Mechanical Properties of Cortical Bone Using Beam Theory and Optimization Methodology With Specimen-Specific Finite Element Models.
    Zhang GJ; Yang J; Guan FJ; Chen D; Li N; Cao L; Mao H
    J Biomech Eng; 2016 Sep; 138(9):. PubMed ID: 27447849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Computed-tomography-based finite-element models of long bones can accurately capture strain response to bending and torsion.
    Varghese B; Short D; Penmetsa R; Goswami T; Hangartner T
    J Biomech; 2011 Apr; 44(7):1374-9. PubMed ID: 21288523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Probabilistic finite element predictions of the human lower limb model in total knee replacement.
    Arsene CT; Gabrys B
    Med Eng Phys; 2013 Aug; 35(8):1116-32. PubMed ID: 23317551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Orthotropic properties of cancellous bone modelled as parameterized cellular material.
    Kowalczyk P
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2006 Jun; 9(3):135-47. PubMed ID: 16880164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Validation of an efficient method of assigning material properties in finite element analysis of pelvic bone.
    Shim VB; Battley M; Anderson IA; Munro JT
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2015; 18(14):1495-9. PubMed ID: 24870395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Finite element prediction of transchondral stress and strain in the human hip.
    Henak CR; Ateshian GA; Weiss JA
    J Biomech Eng; 2014 Feb; 136(2):021021. PubMed ID: 24292495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Prediction of mechanical properties of cortical bone by quantitative computed tomography.
    Duchemin L; Bousson V; Raossanaly C; Bergot C; Laredo JD; Skalli W; Mitton D
    Med Eng Phys; 2008 Apr; 30(3):321-8. PubMed ID: 17596993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Experimental validation of finite element model for proximal composite femur using optical measurements.
    Grassi L; Väänänen SP; Amin Yavari S; Weinans H; Jurvelin JS; Zadpoor AA; Isaksson H
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2013 May; 21():86-94. PubMed ID: 23510970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effect of boundary condition on the biomechanics of a human pelvic joint under an axial compressive load: a three-dimensional finite element model.
    Hao Z; Wan C; Gao X; Ji T
    J Biomech Eng; 2011 Oct; 133(10):101006. PubMed ID: 22070331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Simulation of creep in non-homogenous samples of human cortical bone.
    Ertas AH; Winwood K; Zioupos P; Cotton JR
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2012; 15(10):1121-8. PubMed ID: 21574078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Finite element prediction of endosteal and periosteal bone remodelling in the turkey ulna: effect of remodelling signal and dead-zone definition.
    Taylor WR; Warner MD; Clift SE
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2003; 217(5):349-56. PubMed ID: 14558647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Sensitivity of proximal femoral stiffness and areal bone mineral density to changes in bone geometry and density.
    Pisharody S; Phillips R; Langton CM
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2008 Apr; 222(3):367-75. PubMed ID: 18491705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.