323 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27685108)
1. Simultaneously integrated boost (SIB) spares OAR and reduces treatment time in locally advanced cervical cancer.
Feng CH; Hasan Y; Kopec M; Al-Hallaq HA
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Sep; 17(5):76-89. PubMed ID: 27685108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A dosimetric evaluation of dose escalation for the radical treatment of locally advanced vulvar cancer by intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Bloemers MC; Portelance L; Ruo R; Parker W; Souhami L
Med Dosim; 2012; 37(3):310-3. PubMed ID: 22317848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Which technique for radiation is most beneficial for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer? Intensity modulated proton therapy versus intensity modulated photon treatment, helical tomotherapy and volumetric arc therapy for primary radiation - an intraindividual comparison.
Marnitz S; Wlodarczyk W; Neumann O; Koehler C; Weihrauch M; Budach V; Cozzi L
Radiat Oncol; 2015 Apr; 10():91. PubMed ID: 25896675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dosimetric benefits of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy in the treatment of postoperative cervical cancer patients.
Deng X; Han C; Chen S; Xie C; Yi J; Zhou Y; Zheng X; Deng Z; Jin X
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 18(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 28291936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparative planning study of step-and-shoot IMRT versus helical tomotherapy for whole-pelvis irradiation in cervical cancer.
Chitapanarux I; Tharavichitkul E; Nobnop W; Wanwilairat S; Vongtama R; Traisathit P
J Radiat Res; 2015 May; 56(3):539-45. PubMed ID: 25720771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of efficacy and safety between simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy and conventional intensity-modulated radiotherapy in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a retrospective study.
Wang D; Bi N; Zhang T; Zhou Z; Xiao Z; Liang J; Chen D; Hui Z; Lv J; Wang X; Wang X; Deng L; Wang W; Wang J; Wang C; Lu X; Xu K; Wu L; Xue W; Feng Q; Wang L
Radiat Oncol; 2019 Jun; 14(1):106. PubMed ID: 31196118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative analysis of simultaneous integrated boost and sequential boost radiotherapy in node-positive cervical cancer: dosimetric and radiobiological considerations.
Mishra R; Singh S; Patel G; Mandal A; Mishra H; Pandey A; Bahadur B; Singh PK; Sachan S; Tewari M
Radiat Environ Biophys; 2024 May; 63(2):297-306. PubMed ID: 38722389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) of the parametrium and cervix in radiotherapy for uterine cervical carcinoma: a dosimetric study using a new alternative approach.
Cheng JY; Huang EY; Hsu SN; Wang CJ
Br J Radiol; 2016 Dec; 89(1068):20160526. PubMed ID: 27706947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The normal tissue sparing obtained with simultaneous treatment of pelvic lymph nodes and bladder using intensity-modulated radiotherapy.
Søndergaard J; Høyer M; Petersen JB; Wright P; Grau C; Muren LP
Acta Oncol; 2009; 48(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 18759144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Simultaneous integrated boost plan comparison of volumetric-modulated arc therapy and sliding window intensity-modulated radiotherapy for whole pelvis irradiation of locally advanced prostate cancer.
Riou O; Regnault de la Mothe P; Azria D; Aillères N; Dubois JB; Fenoglietto P
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 Jul; 14(4):4094. PubMed ID: 23835376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dosimetric comparison of intensity-modulated, conformal, and four-field pelvic radiotherapy boost plans for gynecologic cancer: a retrospective planning study.
Chan P; Yeo I; Perkins G; Fyles A; Milosevic M
Radiat Oncol; 2006 May; 1():13. PubMed ID: 16722546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of Monte Carlo algorithm for compliance with RTOG 0915 dosimetric criteria in peripheral lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy.
Pokhrel D; Sood S; Badkul R; Jiang H; McClinton C; Lominska C; Kumar P; Wang F
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 May; 17(3):277-293. PubMed ID: 27167284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of different IMRT boost delivery methods on target coverage and normal-tissue sparing.
Dogan N; King S; Emami B; Mohideen N; Mirkovic N; Leybovich LB; Sethi A
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2003 Dec; 57(5):1480-91. PubMed ID: 14630288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radiotherapy for early mediastinal Hodgkin lymphoma according to the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG): the roles of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and involved-node radiotherapy.
Koeck J; Abo-Madyan Y; Lohr F; Stieler F; Kriz J; Mueller RP; Wenz F; Eich HT
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 May; 83(1):268-76. PubMed ID: 22079733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) for treatment of gynecologic carcinoma: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) vs volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) radiotherapy.
Vergalasova I; Light K; Chino J; Craciunescu O
Med Dosim; 2017 Autumn; 42(3):230-237. PubMed ID: 28711481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A treatment planning and acute toxicity comparison of two pelvic nodal volume delineation techniques and delivery comparison of intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus volumetric modulated arc therapy for hypofractionated high-risk prostate cancer radiotherapy.
Myrehaug S; Chan G; Craig T; Weinberg V; Cheng C; Roach M; Cheung P; Sahgal A
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Mar; 82(4):e657-62. PubMed ID: 22245189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimal dose limitation strategy for bone marrow sparing in intensity-modulated radiotherapy of cervical cancer.
Bao Z; Wang D; Chen S; Chen M; Jiang D; Yang C; Liu H; Dai J; Xie C
Radiat Oncol; 2019 Aug; 14(1):118. PubMed ID: 31378200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radiotherapy treatment plans with RapidArc for prostate cancer involving seminal vesicles and lymph nodes.
Yoo S; Wu QJ; Lee WR; Yin FF
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2010 Mar; 76(3):935-42. PubMed ID: 20044214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dosimetric comparison of combined intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and proton therapy versus IMRT alone for pelvic and para-aortic radiotherapy in gynecologic malignancies.
Milby AB; Both S; Ingram M; Lin LL
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Mar; 82(3):e477-84. PubMed ID: 22177626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Short-course PET based simultaneous integrated boost for locally advanced cervical cancer.
Arnesen MR; Rekstad BL; Stokke C; Bruheim K; Løndalen AM; Hellebust TP; Malinen E
Radiat Oncol; 2016 Mar; 11():39. PubMed ID: 26968827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
