144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27685118)
1. A noise power spectrum study of a new model-based iterative reconstruction system: Veo 3.0.
Li G; Liu X; Dodge CT; Jensen CT; Rong XJ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Sep; 17(5):428-439. PubMed ID: 27685118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Statistical model based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) in clinical CT systems: experimental assessment of noise performance.
Li K; Tang J; Chen GH
Med Phys; 2014 Apr; 41(4):041906. PubMed ID: 24694137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance evaluation of iterative reconstruction algorithms for achieving CT radiation dose reduction - a phantom study.
Dodge CT; Tamm EP; Cody DD; Liu X; Jensen CT; Wei W; Kundra V; Rong XJ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 17(2):511-531. PubMed ID: 27074454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and Veo: assessment of image quality and diagnostic performance in CT colonography at various radiation doses.
Yoon MA; Kim SH; Lee JM; Woo HS; Lee ES; Ahn SJ; Han JK
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(5):596-601. PubMed ID: 22992612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique on image quality in ultra-low-dose CT.
Xu Y; He W; Chen H; Hu Z; Li J; Zhang T
Clin Radiol; 2013 Sep; 68(9):902-8. PubMed ID: 23706621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Third version of vendor-specific model-based iterativereconstruction (Veo 3.0): evaluation of CT image quality in the abdomen using new noise reduction presets and varied slice optimization.
Telesmanich ME; Jensen CT; Enriquez JL; Wagner-Bartak NA; Liu X; Le O; Wei W; Chandler AG; Tamm EP
Br J Radiol; 2017 Aug; 90(1077):20170188. PubMed ID: 28707531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Statistical model based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) in clinical CT systems. Part II. Experimental assessment of spatial resolution performance.
Li K; Garrett J; Ge Y; Chen GH
Med Phys; 2014 Jul; 41(7):071911. PubMed ID: 24989389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of hybrid and pure iterative reconstruction techniques with conventional filtered back projection: dose reduction potential in the abdomen.
Singh S; Kalra MK; Do S; Thibault JB; Pien H; O'Connor OJ; Blake MA
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(3):347-53. PubMed ID: 22592622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of the dose reduction potential of a model-based iterative reconstruction algorithm using a task-based performance metrology.
Samei E; Richard S
Med Phys; 2015 Jan; 42(1):314-23. PubMed ID: 25563271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Third-Generation Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction Technique: Phantom Study of Image Noise, Spatial Resolution, Lesion Detectability, and Dose Reduction Potential.
Euler A; Solomon J; Marin D; Nelson RC; Samei E
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jun; 210(6):1301-1308. PubMed ID: 29702019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computed Tomography Image Quality Evaluation of a New Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm in the Abdomen (Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction-V) a Comparison With Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction, Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction, and Filtered Back Projection Reconstructions.
Goodenberger MH; Wagner-Bartak NA; Gupta S; Liu X; Yap RQ; Sun J; Tamm EP; Jensen CT
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2018; 42(2):184-190. PubMed ID: 28806318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical evaluation of image quality and radiation dose reduction in upper abdominal computed tomography using model-based iterative reconstruction; comparison with filtered back projection and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction.
Nakamoto A; Kim T; Hori M; Onishi H; Tsuboyama T; Sakane M; Tatsumi M; Tomiyama N
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Sep; 84(9):1715-23. PubMed ID: 26037266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Image quality improvement using model-based iterative reconstruction in low dose chest CT for children with necrotizing pneumonia.
Sun J; Yu T; Liu J; Duan X; Hu D; Liu Y; Peng Y
BMC Med Imaging; 2017 Mar; 17(1):24. PubMed ID: 28302073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Initial phantom study comparing image quality in computed tomography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and new adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction v.
Lim K; Kwon H; Cho J; Oh J; Yoon S; Kang M; Ha D; Lee J; Kang E
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(3):443-8. PubMed ID: 25654782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Can conclusions drawn from phantom-based image noise assessments be generalized to in vivo studies for the nonlinear model-based iterative reconstruction method?
Gomez-Cardona D; Li K; Hsieh J; Lubner MG; Pickhardt PJ; Chen GH
Med Phys; 2016 Feb; 43(2):687-95. PubMed ID: 26843232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A quantitative comparison of noise reduction across five commercial (hybrid and model-based) iterative reconstruction techniques: an anthropomorphic phantom study.
Patino M; Fuentes JM; Hayano K; Kambadakone AR; Uyeda JW; Sahani DV
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Feb; 204(2):W176-83. PubMed ID: 25615778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of model-based iterative reconstruction on image quality for low-dose computed tomographic angiography of the thoracic aorta in a Swine model.
Caywood D; Paxton B; Boll D; Nelson R; Kim C; Lowry C; Seaman D; Roos JE; Hurwitz LM
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(2):196-201. PubMed ID: 25474144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of radiation dose and reconstruction algorithm in MDCT assessment of airway wall thickness: A phantom study.
Gomez-Cardona D; Nagle SK; Li K; Robinson TE; Chen GH
Med Phys; 2015 Oct; 42(10):5919-27. PubMed ID: 26429266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ultra-low dose chest computed tomography: Effect of iterative reconstruction levels on image quality.
Afadzi M; Lysvik EK; Andersen HK; Martinsen ACT
Eur J Radiol; 2019 May; 114():62-68. PubMed ID: 31005179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction (MBIR) in reduced-dose CT for routine follow-up of patients with malignant lymphoma: dose savings, image quality and phantom study.
Hérin E; Gardavaud F; Chiaradia M; Beaussart P; Richard P; Cavet M; Deux JF; Haioun C; Itti E; Rahmouni A; Luciani A
Eur Radiol; 2015 Aug; 25(8):2362-70. PubMed ID: 25749813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
