131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27686328)
1. Value and usability of unpublished data sources for systematic reviews and network meta-analyses.
Halfpenny NJ; Quigley JM; Thompson JC; Scott DA
Evid Based Med; 2016 Dec; 21(6):208-213. PubMed ID: 27686328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of reporting bias on meta-analyses of drug trials: reanalysis of meta-analyses.
Hart B; Lundh A; Bero L
BMJ; 2012 Jan; 344():d7202. PubMed ID: 22214754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Rapid network meta-analysis using data from Food and Drug Administration approval packages is feasible but with limitations.
Wang L; Rouse B; Marks-Anglin A; Duan R; Shi Q; Quach K; Chen Y; Cameron C; Schmid CH; Li T
J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Oct; 114():84-94. PubMed ID: 31226413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Selective reporting bias in randomised controlled trials from two network meta-analyses: comparison of clinical trial registrations and their respective publications.
Wong EK; Lachance CC; Page MJ; Watt J; Veroniki A; Straus SE; Tricco AC
BMJ Open; 2019 Sep; 9(9):e031138. PubMed ID: 31492792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Research Techniques Made Simple: Workflow for Searching Databases to Reduce Evidence Selection Bias in Systematic Reviews.
Le Cleach L; Doney E; Katz KA; Williams HC; Trinquart L
J Invest Dermatol; 2016 Dec; 136(12):e125-e129. PubMed ID: 27884295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Grey literature in systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of the contribution of non-English reports, unpublished studies and dissertations to the results of meta-analyses in child-relevant reviews.
Hartling L; Featherstone R; Nuspl M; Shave K; Dryden DM; Vandermeer B
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Apr; 17(1):64. PubMed ID: 28420349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical trial registry use in anaesthesiology systematic reviews: A cross-sectional study of systematic reviews published in anaesthesiology journals and the Cochrane Library.
Umberham BA; Detweiler BN; Sims MT; Vassar M
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2017 Dec; 34(12):797-807. PubMed ID: 28731924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Infliximab, adalimumab and golimumab for treating moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis after the failure of conventional therapy (including a review of TA140 and TA262): clinical effectiveness systematic review and economic model.
Archer R; Tappenden P; Ren S; Martyn-St James M; Harvey R; Basarir H; Stevens J; Carroll C; Cantrell A; Lobo A; Hoque S
Health Technol Assess; 2016 May; 20(39):1-326. PubMed ID: 27220829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of searching clinical trial registries in systematic reviews of pharmaceutical treatments: methodological systematic review and reanalysis of meta-analyses.
Baudard M; Yavchitz A; Ravaud P; Perrodeau E; Boutron I
BMJ; 2017 Feb; 356():j448. PubMed ID: 28213479
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Systematic Reviewers in Clinical Neurology Do Not Routinely Search Clinical Trials Registries.
Sinnett PM; Carr B; Cook G; Mucklerath H; Varney L; Weiher M; Yerokhin V; Vassar M
PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0134596. PubMed ID: 26225564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD
Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reporting of harms in oncological clinical study reports submitted to the European Medicines Agency compared to trial registries and publications-a methodological review.
Paludan-Müller AS; Créquit P; Boutron I
BMC Med; 2021 Apr; 19(1):88. PubMed ID: 33827569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Practical guidance for using multiple data sources in systematic reviews and meta-analyses (with examples from the MUDS study).
Mayo-Wilson E; Li T; Fusco N; Dickersin K;
Res Synth Methods; 2018 Mar; 9(1):2-12. PubMed ID: 29057573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Network meta-analyses could be improved by searching more sources and by involving a librarian.
Li L; Tian J; Tian H; Moher D; Liang F; Jiang T; Yao L; Yang K
J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Sep; 67(9):1001-7. PubMed ID: 24841794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sources of evidence for systematic reviews of interventions in diabetes.
Royle PL; Bain L; Waugh NR
Diabet Med; 2005 Oct; 22(10):1386-93. PubMed ID: 16176201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reporting Bias in Clinical Trials Investigating the Efficacy of Second-Generation Antidepressants in the Treatment of Anxiety Disorders: A Report of 2 Meta-analyses.
Roest AM; de Jonge P; Williams CD; de Vries YA; Schoevers RA; Turner EH
JAMA Psychiatry; 2015 May; 72(5):500-10. PubMed ID: 25806940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical trials registries are underused in the pregnancy and childbirth literature: a systematic review of the top 20 journals.
Yerokhin VV; Carr BK; Sneed G; Vassar M
BMC Res Notes; 2016 Oct; 9(1):475. PubMed ID: 27769265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
