These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2768675)

  • 1. The effect of varying the amplitude-frequency response on the masked speech-reception threshold of sentences for hearing-impaired listeners.
    van Dijkhuizen JN; Festen JM; Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Aug; 86(2):621-8. PubMed ID: 2768675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speech-reception threshold in noise for hearing-impaired listeners in conditions with a varying amplitude-frequency response.
    van Dijkhuizen JN; Festen JM; Plomp R
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():202-6. PubMed ID: 2356728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of varying the slope of the amplitude-frequency response on the masked speech-reception threshold of sentences.
    van Dijkhuizen JN; Anema PC; Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Feb; 81(2):465-9. PubMed ID: 3558964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of frequency-selective attenuation on the speech-reception threshold of sentences in conditions of low-frequency noise.
    van Dijkhuizen JN; Festen JM; Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Aug; 90(2 Pt 1):885-94. PubMed ID: 1939893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing.
    Festen JM; Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Oct; 88(4):1725-36. PubMed ID: 2262629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of a wide range of amplitude-frequency responses for the hearing impaired.
    van Buuren RA; Festen JM; Plomp R
    J Speech Hear Res; 1995 Feb; 38(1):211-21. PubMed ID: 7731212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech-reception Threshold in Noise for Hearing-impaired Listeners in Conditions with a Varying Amplitude-Frequency Response.
    Van Dijkhuizen JN; Festen JM; Plomp R
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1990; 109(sup469):202-206. PubMed ID: 31905540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The efficacy of a multichannel hearing aid in which the gain is controlled by the minima in the temporal signal envelope.
    Festen JM; van Dijkhuizen JN; Plomp R
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():101-10. PubMed ID: 8153556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech recognition and just-follow-conversation tasks for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners with different maskers.
    Larsby B; Arlinger S
    Audiology; 1994; 33(3):165-76. PubMed ID: 8042937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of attention on the speech reception threshold and pupil response of people with impaired and normal hearing.
    Koelewijn T; Versfeld NJ; Kramer SE
    Hear Res; 2017 Oct; 354():56-63. PubMed ID: 28869841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speech-reception threshold in noise with one and two hearing aids.
    Festen JM; Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Feb; 79(2):465-71. PubMed ID: 3950200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A signal-to-noise ratio model for the speech-reception threshold of the hearing impaired.
    Plomp R
    J Speech Hear Res; 1986 Jun; 29(2):146-54. PubMed ID: 3724108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A speech enhancement scheme incorporating spectral expansion evaluated with simulated loss of frequency selectivity.
    Lyzenga J; Festen JM; Houtgast T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Sep; 112(3 Pt 1):1145-57. PubMed ID: 12243161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measuring the threshold for speech reception by adaptive variation of the signal bandwidth. II. Hearing-impaired listeners.
    Noordhoek IM; Houtgast T; Festen JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1685-96. PubMed ID: 10738821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speech recognition in amplitude-modulated noise of listeners with normal and listeners with impaired hearing.
    Eisenberg LS; Dirks DD; Bell TS
    J Speech Hear Res; 1995 Feb; 38(1):222-33. PubMed ID: 7731213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of Instantaneous Compression on Recognition of Speech in Noise with Temporal Dips.
    Rasetshwane DM; Raybine DA; Kopun JG; Gorga MP; Neely ST
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Jan; 30(1):16-30. PubMed ID: 30461387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The intelligibility of sentences in quiet and in noise in aged listeners.
    Duquesnoy AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Oct; 74(4):1136-44. PubMed ID: 6643835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predicting the effect of hearing loss and audibility on amplified speech reception in a multi-talker listening scenario.
    Woods WS; Kalluri S; Pentony S; Nooraei N
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jun; 133(6):4268-78. PubMed ID: 23742377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.