BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

446 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27686942)

  • 1. Age differences in the takeover of vehicle control and engagement in non-driving-related activities in simulated driving with conditional automation.
    Clark H; Feng J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Sep; 106():468-479. PubMed ID: 27686942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Age-related differences in effects of non-driving related tasks on takeover performance in automated driving.
    Wu Y; Kihara K; Hasegawa K; Takeda Y; Sato T; Akamatsu M; Kitazaki S
    J Safety Res; 2020 Feb; 72():231-238. PubMed ID: 32199568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. From partial and high automation to manual driving: Relationship between non-driving related tasks, drowsiness and take-over performance.
    Naujoks F; Höfling S; Purucker C; Zeeb K
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Dec; 121():28-42. PubMed ID: 30205284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is take-over time all that matters? The impact of visual-cognitive load on driver take-over quality after conditionally automated driving.
    Zeeb K; Buchner A; Schrauf M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Jul; 92():230-9. PubMed ID: 27107472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of unreliable automation, non-driving related task, and takeover time budget on drivers' takeover performance and workload.
    Shahini F; Park J; Welch K; Zahabi M
    Ergonomics; 2023 Feb; 66(2):182-197. PubMed ID: 35451915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of Task-Induced Fatigue in Prolonged Conditional Automated Driving.
    Jarosch O; Bellem H; Bengler K
    Hum Factors; 2019 Nov; 61(7):1186-1199. PubMed ID: 30657711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Age-related differences in takeover performance: A comparative analysis of older and younger drivers in prolonged partially automated driving.
    Pan H; Payre W; Xu J; Koppel S
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2024 Jun; ():1-8. PubMed ID: 38860883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Promote or inhibit: An inverted U-shaped effect of workload on driver takeover performance.
    Ma S; Zhang W; Yang Z; Kang C; Wu C; Chai C; Shi J; Li H
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2020; 21(7):482-487. PubMed ID: 32822218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An analysis of physiological responses as indicators of driver takeover readiness in conditionally automated driving.
    Deng M; Gluck A; Zhao Y; Li D; Menassa CC; Kamat VR; Brinkley J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Feb; 195():107372. PubMed ID: 37979464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sleep in highly automated driving: Takeover performance after waking up.
    Wörle J; Metz B; Othersen I; Baumann M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Sep; 144():105617. PubMed ID: 32540623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of takeover request modalities on highly automated car control transitions.
    Yoon SH; Kim YW; Ji YG
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Feb; 123():150-158. PubMed ID: 30503824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Noncritical State Transitions During Conditionally Automated Driving on German Freeways: Effects of Non-Driving Related Tasks on Takeover Time and Takeover Quality.
    Naujoks F; Purucker C; Wiedemann K; Marberger C
    Hum Factors; 2019 Jun; 61(4):596-613. PubMed ID: 30689440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of scheduled manual driving on drowsiness and response to take over request: A simulator study towards understanding drivers in automated driving.
    Wu Y; Kihara K; Takeda Y; Sato T; Akamatsu M; Kitazaki S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Mar; 124():202-209. PubMed ID: 30665055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Psychophysiological responses to takeover requests in conditionally automated driving.
    Du N; Yang XJ; Zhou F
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Dec; 148():105804. PubMed ID: 33128991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is driving experience all that matters? Drivers' takeover performance in conditionally automated driving.
    Zhang N; Fard M; Davy JL; Parida S; Robinson SR
    J Safety Res; 2023 Dec; 87():323-331. PubMed ID: 38081705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predicting driver takeover performance in conditionally automated driving.
    Du N; Zhou F; Pulver EM; Tilbury DM; Robert LP; Pradhan AK; Yang XJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Dec; 148():105748. PubMed ID: 33099127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prior Familiarization With Takeover Requests Affects Drivers' Takeover Performance and Automation Trust.
    Hergeth S; Lorenz L; Krems JF
    Hum Factors; 2017 May; 59(3):457-470. PubMed ID: 27923886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Are child occupants a significant source of driving distraction?
    Koppel S; Charlton J; Kopinathan C; Taranto D
    Accid Anal Prev; 2011 May; 43(3):1236-44. PubMed ID: 21376923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mechanisms behind distracted driving behavior: The role of age and executive function in the engagement of distracted driving.
    Pope CN; Bell TR; Stavrinos D
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Jan; 98():123-129. PubMed ID: 27716494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modeling takeover behavior in level 3 automated driving via a structural equation model: Considering the mediating role of trust.
    Jin M; Lu G; Chen F; Shi X; Tan H; Zhai J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Jul; 157():106156. PubMed ID: 33957474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.