BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27687391)

  • 1. Comparing 3 ventilation modalities by measuring several respiratory parameters using the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in children.
    Templeton TW; Hoke LK; Yaung J; Aschenbrenner CA; Rose DM; Templeton LB; Bryan YF
    J Clin Anesth; 2016 Nov; 34():272-8. PubMed ID: 27687391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of 3 ventilation strategies in children younger than 1 year using a Proseal laryngeal mask airway: a randomized controlled trial.
    Templeton TW; Hoke LK; Templeton LB; Ririe DG; Rose DM; Bryan YF
    J Clin Anesth; 2016 Dec; 35():502-508. PubMed ID: 27871584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pressure support ventilation vs spontaneous ventilation via ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway in pediatric patients undergoing ambulatory surgery: a randomized controlled trial.
    Lim B; Pawar D; Ng O
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2012 Apr; 22(4):360-4. PubMed ID: 22380745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Physiological dead space/tidal volume ratio during face mask, laryngeal mask, and cuffed oropharyngeal airway spontaneous ventilation.
    Casati A; Fanelli G; Torri G
    J Clin Anesth; 1998 Dec; 10(8):652-5. PubMed ID: 9873966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pressure support ventilation with the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway. A comparison of sevoflurane, isoflurane and propofol.
    Keller C; Brimacombe J; Hoermann C; Loeckinger A; Kleinsasser A
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2005 Aug; 22(8):630-3. PubMed ID: 16119601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Patient outcomes with positive pressure versus spontaneous ventilation in non-paralysed adults with the laryngeal mask.
    Keller C; Sparr HJ; Luger TJ; Brimacombe J
    Can J Anaesth; 1998 Jun; 45(6):564-7. PubMed ID: 9669012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pressure support ventilation versus continuous positive airway pressure ventilation with the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a randomized crossover study of anesthetized pediatric patients.
    von Goedecke A; Brimacombe J; Hörmann C; Jeske H-; Kleinsasser A; Keller C
    Anesth Analg; 2005 Feb; 100(2):357-360. PubMed ID: 15673856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. End-tidal concentrations of sevoflurane and desflurane for ProSeal laryngeal mask airway removal in anaesthetised adults: a randomised double-blind study.
    Ghai B; Jain K; Bansal D; Wig J
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2014 May; 31(5):274-9. PubMed ID: 24231668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Propofol or sevoflurane for laryngeal mask airway insertion.
    Molloy ME; Buggy DJ; Scanlon P
    Can J Anaesth; 1999 Apr; 46(4):322-6. PubMed ID: 10232714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predicted values of propofol EC50 and sevoflurane concentration for insertion of laryngeal mask Classic and ProSeal.
    Kodaka M; Okamoto Y; Koyama K; Miyao H
    Br J Anaesth; 2004 Feb; 92(2):242-5. PubMed ID: 14722177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal and the laryngeal tube airway in paralyzed anesthetized adult patients undergoing pressure-controlled ventilation.
    Brimacombe J; Keller C; Brimacombe L
    Anesth Analg; 2002 Sep; 95(3):770-6, table of contents. PubMed ID: 12198070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of sevoflurane concentration for insertion of proseal laryngeal mask airway and tracheal intubation in children (correlation with BIS).
    Mudakanagoudar MS; Santhosh MC
    Braz J Anesthesiol; 2016; 66(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 26768926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Effects of different ventilation mode on pulmonary function during minor operation of general anesthesia with SLIPA laryngeal mask].
    Gan LG; Chen JP
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Aug; 91(32):2261-3. PubMed ID: 22094092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. End-tidal sevoflurane concentration for ProSeal(TM) versus Classic(TM) laryngeal mask airway insertion in unpremedicated anaesthetised adult females.
    Ghai B; Jain K; Bansal D; Bhatia N
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 2016 Mar; 44(2):221-6. PubMed ID: 27029654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of inhalational anaesthesia with low tidal volume ventilation on end-tidal sevoflurane and carbon dioxide concentrations: prospective randomized study.
    de la Matta-Martín M; López-Herrera D; Luis-Navarro JC; López-Romero JL
    Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim; 2014 Feb; 61(2):78-86. PubMed ID: 24373754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of the cuffed oropharyngeal airway (COPA) with the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) during manually controlled positive pressure ventilation.
    Heringlake M; Doerges V; Ocker H; Schmucker P
    J Clin Anesth; 1999 Nov; 11(7):590-5. PubMed ID: 10624645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sevoflurane versus propofol for induction and maintenance of anaesthesia with the laryngeal mask airway in children.
    Lopéz Gil ML; Brimacombe J; Clar B
    Paediatr Anaesth; 1999; 9(6):485-90. PubMed ID: 10597550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Oropharyngeal oxygen and volatile anesthetic agent concentration during the use of laryngeal mask airway in children.
    Hakim M; Krishna SG; Syed A; Lind M; Elmaraghy C; Tobias JD
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2016 Jan; 26(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 26545067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Size 1 ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway in infants: a randomized, noncrossover study with the Classic™ laryngeal mask airway.
    López-Gil M; Mantilla I; Blanco T; Teigell E; Hervias M; Fernández-López R
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2012 Apr; 22(4):365-70. PubMed ID: 22295870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of volume controlled vs. pressure controlled volume guaranteed ventilation in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery with laryngeal mask airway.
    Wang P; Zhao S; Gao Z; Hu J; Lu Y; Chen J
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2021 Mar; 21(1):69. PubMed ID: 33685395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.