219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27687435)
1. King Vision video laryngoscope versus Lightwand as an intubating device in adult patients with Mallampatti grade III and IV patients.
Kamal S; Ali QE; Amir SH; Ahmed S; Pal K
J Clin Anesth; 2016 Nov; 34():483-9. PubMed ID: 27687435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hemodynamic responses to tracheal intubation with laryngoscope versus lightwand intubating device (Trachlight) in adults with normal airway.
Takahashi S; Mizutani T; Miyabe M; Toyooka H
Anesth Analg; 2002 Aug; 95(2):480-4, table of contents. PubMed ID: 12145076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Randomized controlled trial comparing the McGrath MAC video laryngoscope with the King Vision video laryngoscope in adult patients.
Alvis BD; Hester D; Watson D; Higgins M; St Jacques P
Minerva Anestesiol; 2016 Jan; 82(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 25881731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparative evaluation of the Airtraq and King Vision video laryngoscope as an intubating aid in adult patients.
Ali QE; Amir SH; Jamil S; Ahmad S
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg; 2015; 66(3):81-5. PubMed ID: 26767232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Tracheal intubation using the Airtraq: a comparison with the lightwand.
Park EY; Kim JY; Lee JS
Anaesthesia; 2010 Jul; 65(7):729-32. PubMed ID: 20497149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Nasotracheal intubation using the Blind Intubation Device in anaesthetised adults with Mallampati class 3: a comparison with the Macintosh laryngoscope.
Sun Y; Liu JX; Zhu YS; Xu H; Huang Y; Jiang H
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2011 Nov; 28(11):774-80. PubMed ID: 21885980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Management of the predicted difficult airway: a comparison of conventional blade laryngoscopy with video-assisted blade laryngoscopy and the GlideScope.
Serocki G; Bein B; Scholz J; Dörges V
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Jan; 27(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 19809328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is video laryngoscope-assisted flexible tracheoscope intubation feasible for patients with predicted difficult airway? A prospective, randomized clinical trial.
Lenhardt R; Burkhart MT; Brock GN; Kanchi-Kandadai S; Sharma R; Akça O
Anesth Analg; 2014 Jun; 118(6):1259-65. PubMed ID: 24842175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hemodynamic comparison of direct vision versus blind oral endotracheal intubation.
Kovac AL; Maye JP; Devane GG; Calkins JW
J Clin Anesth; 1995 Aug; 7(5):411-6. PubMed ID: 7576678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Comparison Between the Conventional and the Laryngoscope-Assisted Lightwand Intubation Techniques in Patients With Cervical Immobilization: A Prospective Randomized Study.
Kim E; Kim BG; Lim YJ; Jeon YT; Hwang JW; Lee SY; Park HP
Anesth Analg; 2017 Sep; 125(3):854-859. PubMed ID: 27755056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the macintosh and airtraq laryngoscopes in morbidly obese patients: a randomized and prospective study.
Castillo-Monzón CG; Marroquín-Valz HA; Fernández-Villacañas-Marín M; Moreno-Cascales M; García-Rojo B; Candia-Arana CA
J Clin Anesth; 2017 Feb; 36():136-141. PubMed ID: 28183552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the Airtraq and McCoy laryngoscopes using a rigid neck collar in patients with simulated difficult laryngoscopy.
Ali QE; Das B; Amir SH; Siddiqui OA; Jamil S
J Clin Anesth; 2014 May; 26(3):199-203. PubMed ID: 24809787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [A comparison of Airtraq™ laryngoscope and standard direct laryngoscopy in adult patients with immobilized cervical spine].
Amor M; Nabil S; Bensghir M; Moussaoui A; Kabbaj S; Kamili ND; Maazouzi W
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim; 2013 May; 32(5):296-301. PubMed ID: 23561715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of hemodynamic changes after endotracheal intubation by using the lightwand device and the laryngoscope in normotensive and hypertensive patients.
Nishikawa K; Omote K; Kawana S; Namiki A
Anesth Analg; 2000 May; 90(5):1203-7. PubMed ID: 10781480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Laryngoscope and a new tracheal tube assist lightwand intubation in difficult airways due to unstable cervical spine.
Wu CN; Ma WH; Wei JQ; Wei HF; Cen QY; Cai QX; Cao Y
PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0120231. PubMed ID: 25803435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of three video laryngoscopy devices to direct laryngoscopy for intubating obese patients: a randomized controlled trial.
Yumul R; Elvir-Lazo OL; White PF; Sloninsky A; Kaplan M; Kariger R; Naruse R; Parker N; Pham C; Zhang X; Wender RH
J Clin Anesth; 2016 Jun; 31():71-7. PubMed ID: 27185681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lightwand-guided endotracheal intubation performed by the nondominant hand is feasible.
Kuo YW; Yen MK; Cheng KI; Tang CS; Chau SW; Hou MF; Wang JJ; Lin SF
Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2007 Oct; 23(10):504-10. PubMed ID: 18055296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intraocular pressure changes: the McGrath video laryngoscope vs the Macintosh laryngoscope; a randomized trial.
Karaman T; Dogru S; Karaman S; Demir S; Kaya Z; Suren M; Arici S; Kahveci M; Alim S
J Clin Anesth; 2016 Nov; 34():358-64. PubMed ID: 27687410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the lightwand technique with direct laryngoscopy for awake endotracheal intubation in emergency cases.
Nishikawa K; Kawana S; Namiki A
J Clin Anesth; 2001 Jun; 13(4):259-63. PubMed ID: 11435049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Transfer of skills and comparison of performance between king vision® video laryngoscope and macintosh blade following an AHA airway management course.
Wolf LE; Aguirre JA; Vogt C; Keller C; Borgeat A; Bruppacher HR
BMC Anesthesiol; 2017 Jan; 17(1):5. PubMed ID: 28125969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
