265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27687831)
1. Correlation between apparent diffusion coefficient value on diffusion-weighted MR imaging and Gleason score in prostate cancer.
Wu X; Reinikainen P; Vanhanen A; Kapanen M; Vierikko T; Ryymin P; Hyödynmaa S; Kellokumpu-Lehtinen PL
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2017 Jan; 98(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 27687831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Apparent diffusion coefficient values are superior to transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy for the assessment of prostate cancer aggressiveness.
Li C; Chen M; Wang J; Wang X; Zhang W; Zhang C
Acta Radiol; 2017 Feb; 58(2):232-239. PubMed ID: 27055916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prostate cancer vs. post-biopsy hemorrhage: diagnosis with T2- and diffusion-weighted imaging.
Rosenkrantz AB; Kopec M; Kong X; Melamed J; Dakwar G; Babb JS; Taouli B
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jun; 31(6):1387-94. PubMed ID: 20512891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diffusion-weighted MRI of peripheral zone prostate cancer: comparison of tumor apparent diffusion coefficient with Gleason score and percentage of tumor on core biopsy.
Woodfield CA; Tung GA; Grand DJ; Pezzullo JA; Machan JT; Renzulli JF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Apr; 194(4):W316-22. PubMed ID: 20308476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Initial experience with identifying high-grade prostate cancer using diffusion-weighted MR imaging (DWI) in patients with a Gleason score ≤ 3 + 3 = 6 upon schematic TRUS-guided biopsy: a radical prostatectomy correlated series.
Somford DM; Hambrock T; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Fütterer JJ; van Oort IM; van Basten JP; Karthaus HF; Witjes JA; Barentsz JO
Invest Radiol; 2012 Mar; 47(3):153-8. PubMed ID: 22293513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Apparent diffusion coefficient value and ratio as noninvasive potential biomarkers to predict prostate cancer grading: comparison with prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen.
De Cobelli F; Ravelli S; Esposito A; Giganti F; Gallina A; Montorsi F; Del Maschio A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Mar; 204(3):550-7. PubMed ID: 25714284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Versus Standard Diffusion Imaging for Detection and Grading of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer.
Roethke MC; Kuder TA; Kuru TH; Fenchel M; Hadaschik BA; Laun FB; Schlemmer HP; Stieltjes B
Invest Radiol; 2015 Aug; 50(8):483-9. PubMed ID: 25867657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The correlation between biological activity and diffusion-weighted MR imaging and ADC value in cases with prostate cancer.
Sokmen BK; Sokmen D; Ucar N; Ozkurt H; Simsek A
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2017 Dec; 89(4):277-281. PubMed ID: 29473377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diffusion-weighted imaging predicts upgrading of Gleason score in biopsy-proven low grade prostate cancers.
Park SY; Oh YT; Jung DC; Cho NH; Choi YD; Rha KH; Hong SJ
BJU Int; 2017 Jan; 119(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 26823024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prostate Cancer: Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging for Detection and Assessment of Aggressiveness-Comparison between Conventional and Kurtosis Models.
Tamada T; Prabhu V; Li J; Babb JS; Taneja SS; Rosenkrantz AB
Radiology; 2017 Jul; 284(1):100-108. PubMed ID: 28394755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Discussion of correlation between histogram analysis of quantitative diffusion weighted imaging and Gleason score of prostate cancer].
Wen R; Zhao WL; Wei CG; Gu YF; Li MJ; Zhang YY; Shen JK
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Mar; 99(11):823-828. PubMed ID: 30893724
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of prostate cancer: correlation of quantitative MR parameters with Gleason score and tumor angiogenesis.
Oto A; Yang C; Kayhan A; Tretiakova M; Antic T; Schmid-Tannwald C; Eggener S; Karczmar GS; Stadler WM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Dec; 197(6):1382-90. PubMed ID: 22109293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prostate cancer aggressiveness: assessment with whole-lesion histogram analysis of the apparent diffusion coefficient.
Donati OF; Mazaheri Y; Afaq A; Vargas HA; Zheng J; Moskowitz CS; Hricak H; Akin O
Radiology; 2014 Apr; 271(1):143-52. PubMed ID: 24475824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Triage of low-risk prostate cancer patients with PSA levels 10 ng/ml or less: comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient value and transrectal ultrasound-guided target biopsy.
Itatani R; Namimoto T; Kajihara H; Katahira K; Kitani K; Hamada Y; Yamashita Y
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 May; 202(5):1051-7. PubMed ID: 24758659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prospective assessment of prostate cancer aggressiveness using 3-T diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsies versus a systematic 10-core transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsy cohort.
Hambrock T; Hoeks C; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Scheenen T; Fütterer J; Bouwense S; van Oort I; Schröder F; Huisman H; Barentsz J
Eur Urol; 2012 Jan; 61(1):177-84. PubMed ID: 21924545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of apparent diffusion coefficient and MR volumetry as independent associative factors for extra-prostatic extension (EPE) in prostatic carcinoma.
Lim C; Flood TA; Hakim SW; Shabana WM; Quon JS; El-Khodary M; Thornhill RE; El Hallani S; Schieda N
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Mar; 43(3):726-36. PubMed ID: 26303719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prostate MRI: diffusion-weighted imaging at 1.5T correlates better with prostatectomy Gleason Grades than TRUS-guided biopsies in peripheral zone tumours.
Bittencourt LK; Barentsz JO; de Miranda LC; Gasparetto EL
Eur Radiol; 2012 Feb; 22(2):468-75. PubMed ID: 21913058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Utility of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient in detection of prostate cancer and prediction of pathologic Gleason score].
Kagebayashi Y; Nakai Y; Matsumoto Y; Samma S; Miyasaka T; Nakagawa H
Hinyokika Kiyo; 2012 Aug; 58(8):405-8. PubMed ID: 23052263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prostate cancer aggressive prediction: preponderant diagnostic performances of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) beyond ADC at 3.0 T scanner with gleason score at final pathology.
Shan Y; Chen X; Liu K; Zeng M; Zhou J
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Oct; 44(10):3441-3452. PubMed ID: 31144091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Preoperative Evaluation of Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness: Using ADC and ADC Ratio in Determining Gleason Score.
Woo S; Kim SY; Cho JY; Kim SH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jul; 207(1):114-20. PubMed ID: 27077643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
