264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27687831)
21. Diffusion-weighted endorectal MR imaging at 3T for prostate cancer: correlation with tumor cell density and percentage Gleason pattern on whole mount pathology.
Glazer DI; Hassanzadeh E; Fedorov A; Olubiyi OI; Goldberger SS; Penzkofer T; Flood TA; Masry P; Mulkern RV; Hirsch MS; Tempany CM; Fennessy FM
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Mar; 42(3):918-925. PubMed ID: 27770164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The value of diffusion-weighted MRI for prostate cancer detection and localization.
Yağci AB; Ozari N; Aybek Z; Düzcan E
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2011 Jun; 17(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 20694948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Nine-year Follow-up for a Study of Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in a Prospective Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance Cohort.
Henderson DR; de Souza NM; Thomas K; Riches SF; Morgan VA; Sohaib SA; Dearnaley DP; Parker CC; van As NJ
Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1028-33. PubMed ID: 26482887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Detection of prostate cancer with magnetic resonance imaging: optimization of T1-weighted, T2-weighted, dynamic-enhanced T1-weighted, diffusion-weighted imaging apparent diffusion coefficient mapping sequences and MR spectroscopy, correlated with biopsy and histopathological findings.
Aydin H; Kizilgöz V; Tatar IG; Damar C; Ugan AR; Paker I; Hekimoğlu B
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(1):30-45. PubMed ID: 22261768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Incremental value of high b value diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 3-T for prediction of extracapsular extension in patients with prostate cancer: preliminary experience.
Kido A; Tamada T; Sone T; Kanomata N; Miyaji Y; Yamamoto A; Ito K
Radiol Med; 2017 Mar; 122(3):228-238. PubMed ID: 27943099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A comparative study of Gaussian and non-Gaussian diffusion models for differential diagnosis of prostate cancer with in-bore transrectal MR-guided biopsy as a pathological reference.
Li C; Chen M; Wan B; Yu J; Liu M; Zhang W; Wang J
Acta Radiol; 2018 Nov; 59(11):1395-1402. PubMed ID: 29486596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.
Boesen L
Dan Med J; 2017 Feb; 64(2):. PubMed ID: 28157066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Apparent diffusion coefficient for prostate cancer imaging: impact of B values.
Peng Y; Jiang Y; Antic T; Sethi I; Schmid-Tannwald C; Eggener S; Oto A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Mar; 202(3):W247-53. PubMed ID: 24555621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The Utility of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Perfusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging Parameters for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Cindil E; Oner Y; Sendur HN; Ozdemir H; Gazel E; Tunc L; Cerit MN
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2019 Nov; 70(4):441-451. PubMed ID: 31561925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Prostate cancer: correlation of intravoxel incoherent motion MR parameters with Gleason score.
Yang DM; Kim HC; Kim SW; Jahng GH; Won KY; Lim SJ; Oh JH
Clin Imaging; 2016; 40(3):445-50. PubMed ID: 27133684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Whole-Tumor Quantitative Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Histogram and Texture Analysis to Predict Gleason Score Upgrading in Intermediate-Risk 3 + 4 = 7 Prostate Cancer.
Rozenberg R; Thornhill RE; Flood TA; Hakim SW; Lim C; Schieda N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Apr; 206(4):775-82. PubMed ID: 27003049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Utility of computed diffusion-weighted MRI for predicting aggressiveness of prostate cancer.
Waseda Y; Yoshida S; Takahara T; Kwee TC; Matsuoka Y; Saito K; Kihara K; Fujii Y
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Aug; 46(2):490-496. PubMed ID: 28152258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Can DW-MRI, with its ADC values, be a reliable predictor of biopsy outcome in patients with suspected prostate cancer?
Faletti R; Battisti G; Discalzi A; Grognardi ML; Martinello S; Oderda M; Gontero P; Bergamasco L; Cassinis MC; Fonio P
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 May; 41(5):926-33. PubMed ID: 27193791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. MRI of the Prostate With and Without Endorectal Coil at 3 T: Correlation With Whole-Mount Histopathologic Gleason Score.
Dhatt R; Choy S; Co SJ; Ischia J; Kozlowski P; Harris AC; Jones EC; Black PC; Goldenberg SL; Chang SD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Jul; 215(1):133-141. PubMed ID: 32160050
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Differentiation of prostate cancer lesions in the Transition Zone by diffusion-weighted MRI.
Bao J; Wang X; Hu C; Hou J; Dong F; Guo L
Eur J Radiol Open; 2017; 4():123-128. PubMed ID: 29034282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Helps to Predict Upgrading in Biopsy-Proven Prostate Cancer With a Gleason Score of 6.
Wu CJ; Zhang YD; Bao ML; Li H; Wang XN; Liu XS; Shi HB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Nov; 209(5):1081-1087. PubMed ID: 28834443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Non-invasive estimation of prostate cancer aggressiveness using diffusion-weighted MRI and 3D proton MR spectroscopy at 3.0 T.
Thörmer G; Otto J; Horn LC; Garnov N; Do M; Franz T; Stolzenburg JU; Moche M; Kahn T; Busse H
Acta Radiol; 2015 Jan; 56(1):121-8. PubMed ID: 24504488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Does normalisation improve the diagnostic performance of apparent diffusion coefficient values for prostate cancer assessment? A blinded independent-observer evaluation.
Rosenkrantz AB; Khalef V; Xu W; Babb JS; Taneja SS; Doshi AM
Clin Radiol; 2015 Sep; 70(9):1032-7. PubMed ID: 26126712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Exponential apparent diffusion coefficient in evaluating prostate cancer at 3 T: preliminary experience.
Park SY; Kim CK; Park JJ; Park BK
Br J Radiol; 2016; 89(1058):20150470. PubMed ID: 26653866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. T2* relaxation time in the detection and assessment of aggressiveness of peripheral zone cancer in comparison with diffusion-weighted imaging.
Wu LM; Zhou B; Lu Q; Suo ST; Liu Q; Hu J; Haccke EM; Chen XX; Xu JR
Clin Radiol; 2016 Apr; 71(4):356-62. PubMed ID: 26823021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
