231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27687890)
1. Immediate Post-Concussion and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT): a systematic review of the prevalence and assessment of invalid performance.
Gaudet CE; Weyandt LL
Clin Neuropsychol; 2017 Jan; 31(1):43-58. PubMed ID: 27687890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Half of Purposeful Baseline Sandbaggers Undetected by ImPACT's Embedded Invalidity Indicators.
Raab CA; Peak AS; Knoderer C
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2020 Apr; 35(3):283-290. PubMed ID: 30957141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An updated review of the prevalence of invalid performance on the Immediate Post-Concussion and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT).
Messa I; Korcsog K; Abeare C
Clin Neuropsychol; 2022 Oct; 36(7):1613-1636. PubMed ID: 33356881
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The prevalence and correlates of scores falling below ImPACT embedded validity indicators among adolescent student athletes.
Liu BC; Iverson GL; Cook NE; Schatz P; Berkner P; Gaudet CE
Clin Neuropsychol; 2024 Jul; 38(5):1175-1192. PubMed ID: 38233364
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Rates and Predictors of Invalid Baseline Test Performance in High School and Collegiate Athletes for 3 Computerized Neurocognitive Tests: ANAM, Axon Sports, and ImPACT.
Nelson LD; Pfaller AY; Rein LE; McCrea MA
Am J Sports Med; 2015 Aug; 43(8):2018-26. PubMed ID: 26059178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Age and test setting affect the prevalence of invalid baseline scores on neurocognitive tests.
Lichtenstein JD; Moser RS; Schatz P
Am J Sports Med; 2014 Feb; 42(2):479-84. PubMed ID: 24243771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prevalence of invalid ImPACT baseline test results among high school athletes with invalidity and sandbagging indices.
Tsushima WT; Lawton DRY; Kimata C; Siu AM
Clin Neuropsychol; 2023 Oct; 37(7):1516-1529. PubMed ID: 36458597
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Computerized neurocognitive assessments and detection of the malingering athlete.
Siedlik JA; Siscos S; Evans K; Rolf A; Gallagher P; Seeley J; Vardiman J
J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 2016 Sep; 56(9):1086-91. PubMed ID: 26472603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Rey Dot Counting Test as a Tool for Detecting Suboptimal Performance in Athlete Baseline Testing.
DaCosta A; Webbe F; LoGalbo A
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2021 Apr; 36(3):414-423. PubMed ID: 32719864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prevalence of invalid computerized baseline neurocognitive test results in high school and collegiate athletes.
Schatz P; Moser RS; Solomon GS; Ott SD; Karpf R
J Athl Train; 2012; 47(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 22892410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Relation Between Testing Environment and Baseline Performance in Child and Adolescent Concussion Assessment.
Vaughan CG; Gerst EH; Sady MD; Newman JB; Gioia GA
Am J Sports Med; 2014 Jul; 42(7):1716-23. PubMed ID: 24787043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Valid but Invalid: Suboptimal ImPACT Baseline Performance in University Athletes.
Walton SR; Broshek DK; Freeman JR; Cullum CM; Resch JE
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2018 Jul; 50(7):1377-1384. PubMed ID: 29485429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prevalence of Invalid Performance on Baseline Testing for Sport-Related Concussion by Age and Validity Indicator.
Abeare CA; Messa I; Zuccato BG; Merker B; Erdodi L
JAMA Neurol; 2018 Jun; 75(6):697-703. PubMed ID: 29532050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Financial incentives influence ImPACT validity indices but not cognitive composite scores.
Merritt VC; Rabinowitz AR; Guty E; Meyer JE; Greenberg LS; Arnett PA
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2019 Apr; 41(3):312-319. PubMed ID: 30516088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Novel ImPACT validity indices in collegiate student-athletes with and without histories of ADHD or academic difficulties.
Manderino LM; Zachman AM; Gunstad J
Clin Neuropsychol; 2019 Nov; 33(8):1455-1466. PubMed ID: 30516427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Utility of repeated assessment after invalid baseline neurocognitive test performance.
Schatz P; Kelley T; Ott SD; Solomon GS; Elbin RJ; Higgins K; Moser RS
J Athl Train; 2014; 49(5):659-64. PubMed ID: 25162778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sandbagging on the Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) in a high school athlete population.
Higgins KL; Denney RL; Maerlender A
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2017 May; 32(3):259-266. PubMed ID: 28431031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The ability of CNS vital signs to detect coached sandbagging performance during concussion baseline testing: a randomized control trial.
Anderson MN; Lempke LB; Bell DH; Lynall RC; Schmidt JD
Brain Inj; 2020 Feb; 34(3):369-374. PubMed ID: 32026729
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Detecting performance invalidity in children: not quite as easy as A, B, C, 1, 2, 3 but automatized sequences appears promising.
Kirkwood MW; Connery AK; Kirk JW; Baker DA
Child Neuropsychol; 2014 Mar; 20(2):245-52. PubMed ID: 23297668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Performance and symptom validity assessment in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Base rates of invalidity, concordance, and relative impact on cognitive performance.
Ovsiew GP; Cerny BM; Boer AB; Petry LG; Resch ZJ; Durkin NM; Soble JR
Clin Neuropsychol; 2023 Oct; 37(7):1498-1515. PubMed ID: 36594201
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
