These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27688007)

  • 1. Individual differences in exploratory activity relate to cognitive judgement bias in carpenter ants.
    d'Ettorre P; Carere C; Demora L; Le Quinquis P; Signorotti L; Bovet D
    Behav Processes; 2017 Jan; 134():63-69. PubMed ID: 27688007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Active explorers show low learning performance in a social insect.
    Udino E; Perez M; Carere C; d'Ettorre P
    Curr Zool; 2017 Oct; 63(5):555-560. PubMed ID: 29492015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fast- and slow-exploring pigeons differ in how they use previously learned rules.
    Guillette LM; Baron DM; Sturdy CB; Spetch ML
    Behav Processes; 2017 Jan; 134():54-62. PubMed ID: 27567525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Individual behavioural type and group performance in Formica fusca ants.
    Carere C; Audebrand C; Rödel HG; d'Ettorre P
    Behav Processes; 2018 Dec; 157():402-407. PubMed ID: 30036642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An Exploration Based Cognitive Bias Test for Mice: Effects of Handling Method and Stereotypic Behaviour.
    Novak J; Bailoo JD; Melotti L; Rommen J; Würbel H
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0130718. PubMed ID: 26154309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sex differences in performance on a cognitive bias task in Norway rats.
    Brown GR; Cullum P; Martin S; Healy SD
    Behav Processes; 2016 Dec; 133():52-55. PubMed ID: 27836736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A test to identify judgement bias in mice.
    Boleij H; van't Klooster J; Lavrijsen M; Kirchhoff S; Arndt SS; Ohl F
    Behav Brain Res; 2012 Jul; 233(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 22562041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Judgement bias of group housed gestating sows predicted by behavioral traits, but not physical measures of welfare.
    Horback KM; Parsons TD
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(2):e0264258. PubMed ID: 35213574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bottlenose dolphins engaging in more social affiliative behaviour judge ambiguous cues more optimistically.
    Clegg IL; Rödel HG; Delfour F
    Behav Brain Res; 2017 Mar; 322(Pt A):115-122. PubMed ID: 28110003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Frontal brain deactivation during a non-verbal cognitive judgement bias test in sheep.
    Guldimann K; Vögeli S; Wolf M; Wechsler B; Gygax L
    Brain Cogn; 2015 Feb; 93():35-41. PubMed ID: 25506630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Worms under cover: relationships between performance in learning tasks and personality in great tits (Parus major).
    Amy M; van Oers K; Naguib M
    Anim Cogn; 2012 Sep; 15(5):763-70. PubMed ID: 22532072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Housing conditions affect rat responses to two types of ambiguity in a reward-reward discrimination cognitive bias task.
    Parker RM; Paul ES; Burman OH; Browne WJ; Mendl M
    Behav Brain Res; 2014 Nov; 274():73-83. PubMed ID: 25106739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Behavioural plasticity across social contexts is regulated by the directionality of inter-individual differences.
    Guayasamin OL; Couzin ID; Miller NY
    Behav Processes; 2017 Aug; 141(Pt 2):196-204. PubMed ID: 27737769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measuring Cognitive Judgement Bias in Rats Using the Ambiguous-Cue Interpretation Test.
    Papciak J; Rygula R
    Curr Protoc Neurosci; 2017 Jan; 78():9.57.1-9.57.22. PubMed ID: 28046201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is there a bias in spatial maze judgment bias tests? Individual differences in subjects' novelty response can affect test results.
    Jardim V; Verjat A; Féron C; Châline N; Rödel HG
    Behav Brain Res; 2021 Jun; 407():113262. PubMed ID: 33775775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sick ants become unsociable.
    Bos N; Lefèvre T; Jensen AB; d'Ettorre P
    J Evol Biol; 2012 Feb; 25(2):342-51. PubMed ID: 22122288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Learning speed is affected by personality and reproductive investment in a songbird.
    Rivera-Gutierrez HF; Martens T; Pinxten R; Eens M
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0185410. PubMed ID: 29020028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Individual Differences in Response to Ambiguous Stimuli in a Modified Go/No-Go Paradigm are Associated with Personality in Family Dogs.
    Bunford N; Csibra B; Gácsi M
    Sci Rep; 2019 Jul; 9(1):11067. PubMed ID: 31363152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Are hungry sheep more pessimistic? The effects of food restriction on cognitive bias and the involvement of ghrelin in its regulation.
    Verbeek E; Ferguson D; Lee C
    Physiol Behav; 2014 Jan; 123():67-75. PubMed ID: 24096007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A small number of workers with specific personality traits perform tool use in ants.
    Maák I; Roelandt G; d'Ettorre P
    Elife; 2020 Dec; 9():. PubMed ID: 33295872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.