555 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27688476)
21. Y-90 PET/MR imaging optimization with a Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm.
Calatayud-Jordán J; Carrasco-Vela N; Chimeno-Hernández J; Carles-Fariña M; Olivas-Arroyo C; Bello-Arqués P; Pérez-Enguix D; Martí-Bonmatí L; Torres-Espallardo I
Phys Eng Sci Med; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38884672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Treatment response assessment in [
Dolci C; Spadavecchia C; Crivellaro C; De Ponti E; Todde S; Morzenti S; Turolla EA; Crespi A; Guerra L; Landoni C
Phys Med; 2019 Jan; 57():177-182. PubMed ID: 30738523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Does a novel penalized likelihood reconstruction of 18F-FDG PET-CT improve signal-to-background in colorectal liver metastases?
Parvizi N; Franklin JM; McGowan DR; Teoh EJ; Bradley KM; Gleeson FV
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Oct; 84(10):1873-8. PubMed ID: 26163992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Bayesian penalized likelihood PET reconstruction impact on quantitative metrics in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Young JR; Mugu VK; Johnson GB; Ehman EC; Packard AT; Homb AC; Nathan MA; Thanarajasingam G; Kemp BJ
Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Feb; 102(6):e32665. PubMed ID: 36820562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Influence of Reconstruction FOV and Matrix Size on the Quantitative Accuracy of FDG-PET: Comparison between OSEM and Bayesian Penalized Likelihood].
Mikami S; Nakamura F; Nakamura A; Torizuka T
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2021; 77(5):454-462. PubMed ID: 34011788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Clinical evaluation of a block sequential regularized expectation maximization reconstruction algorithm in 18F-FDG PET/CT studies.
Sah BR; Stolzmann P; Delso G; Wollenweber SD; Hüllner M; Hakami YA; Queiroz MA; Barbosa FG; von Schulthess GK; Pietsch C; Veit-Haibach P
Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Jan; 38(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 27755394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Dose volume histogram-based optimization of image reconstruction parameters for quantitative
Siman W; Mikell JK; Mawlawi OR; Mourtada F; Kappadath SC
Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 46(1):229-237. PubMed ID: 30375655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Relaxed ordered subset preconditioned alternating projection algorithm for PET reconstruction with automated penalty weight selection.
Ross Schmidtlein C; Lin Y; Li S; Krol A; Beattie BJ; Humm JL; Xu Y
Med Phys; 2017 Aug; 44(8):4083-4097. PubMed ID: 28437565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Optimization of PET/CT image quality using the GE 'Sharp IR' point-spread function reconstruction algorithm.
Vennart NJ; Bird N; Buscombe J; Cheow HK; Nowosinska E; Heard S
Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Jun; 38(6):471-479. PubMed ID: 28394818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Radioembolization lung shunt estimation based on a
Kunnen B; van der Velden S; Bastiaannet R; Lam MGEH; Viergever MA; de Jong HWAM
Med Phys; 2018 Oct; 45(10):4744-4753. PubMed ID: 30179259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Phantom and clinical assessment of small pulmonary nodules using Q.Clear reconstruction on a silicon-photomultiplier-based time-of-flight PET/CT system.
Wu Z; Guo B; Huang B; Hao X; Wu P; Zhao B; Qin Z; Xie J; Li S
Sci Rep; 2021 May; 11(1):10328. PubMed ID: 33990659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Quantitative comparison of OSEM and penalized likelihood image reconstruction using relative difference penalties for clinical PET.
Ahn S; Ross SG; Asma E; Miao J; Jin X; Cheng L; Wollenweber SD; Manjeshwar RM
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Aug; 60(15):5733-51. PubMed ID: 26158503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Does the beta regularization parameter of bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction always affect the quantification accuracy and image quality of positron emission tomography computed tomography?
Wu Z; Guo B; Huang B; Zhao B; Qin Z; Hao X; Liang M; Xie J; Li S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 Mar; 22(3):224-233. PubMed ID: 33683004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effects of New Bayesian Penalized Likelihood Reconstruction Algorithm on Visualization and Quantification of Upper Abdominal Malignant Tumors in Clinical FDG PET/CT Examinations.
Tatsumi M; Soeda F; Kamiya T; Ueda J; Katayama D; Matsunaga K; Watabe T; Kato H; Tomiyama N
Front Oncol; 2021; 11():707023. PubMed ID: 34485143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Reduced count pediatric whole-body
Alves VPV; Ata NA; MacLean J; Sharp SE; Li Y; Brady S; Trout AT
Pediatr Radiol; 2024 Jan; 54(1):170-180. PubMed ID: 37962603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A novel figure of merit to investigate
Santoro M; Della Gala G; Paolani G; Zagni F; Civollani S; Strolin S; Strigari L
Phys Med; 2023 Feb; 106():102523. PubMed ID: 36641902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Monte Carlo simulation of PET and SPECT imaging of 90Y.
Takahashi A; Himuro K; Yamashita Y; Komiya I; Baba S; Sasaki M
Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):1926-35. PubMed ID: 25832083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effect of Bayesian-penalized likelihood reconstruction on [13N]-NH3 rest perfusion quantification.
O' Doherty J; McGowan DR; Abreu C; Barrington S
J Nucl Cardiol; 2017 Feb; 24(1):282-290. PubMed ID: 27435278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Optimising quantitative
Scott NP; McGowan DR
EJNMMI Res; 2019 May; 9(1):40. PubMed ID: 31076913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. 4-Step renal dosimetry dependent on cortex geometry applied to 90Y peptide receptor radiotherapy: evaluation using a fillable kidney phantom imaged by 90Y PET.
Walrand S; Jamar F; van Elmbt L; Lhommel R; Bekonde EB; Pauwels S
J Nucl Med; 2010 Dec; 51(12):1969-73. PubMed ID: 21078802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
