481 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27689510)
21. Enhancing wastewater reuse by forward osmosis with self-diluted commercial fertilizers as draw solutes.
Zou S; He Z
Water Res; 2016 Aug; 99():235-243. PubMed ID: 27174605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The application of forward osmosis for simulated surface water treatment by using trisodium citrate as draw solute.
Yang S; Gao B; Zhao P; Wang C; Shen X; Yue Q; Shon HK
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Mar; 26(9):8585-8593. PubMed ID: 30710329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Trace organic solutes in closed-loop forward osmosis applications: influence of membrane fouling and modeling of solute build-up.
D'Haese A; Le-Clech P; Van Nevel S; Verbeken K; Cornelissen ER; Khan SJ; Verliefde AR
Water Res; 2013 Sep; 47(14):5232-44. PubMed ID: 23866149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A Comprehensive Review on Forward Osmosis Water Treatment: Recent Advances and Prospects of Membranes and Draw Solutes.
Xu Y; Zhu Y; Chen Z; Zhu J; Chen G
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jul; 19(13):. PubMed ID: 35805879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Water reclamation from emulsified oily wastewater via effective forward osmosis hollow fiber membranes under the PRO mode.
Han G; de Wit JS; Chung TS
Water Res; 2015 Sep; 81():54-63. PubMed ID: 26043371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of the removal of hydrophobic trace organic contaminants by forward osmosis and reverse osmosis.
Xie M; Nghiem LD; Price WE; Elimelech M
Water Res; 2012 May; 46(8):2683-92. PubMed ID: 22402269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Application of MnFe
Asghar N; Nguyen DA; Jang A
Chemosphere; 2023 Jul; 330():138735. PubMed ID: 37088213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Desalination of brackish groundwater and reuse of wastewater by forward osmosis coupled with nanofiltration for draw solution recovery.
Giagnorio M; Ricceri F; Tiraferri A
Water Res; 2019 Apr; 153():134-143. PubMed ID: 30708192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Computing the effective diffusion coefficient of solutes in a multi-salts solutions during forward osmosis (FO) membrane filtration: Experiments and mathematical modelling.
Liyanaarachchi S; Muthukumaran S; Kaiser J; Rogers P; Shu L; Shon HK; Jegatheesan V
J Environ Manage; 2018 May; 214():215-223. PubMed ID: 29525754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Fouling propensity of forward osmosis: investigation of the slower flux decline phenomenon.
Lay WC; Chong TH; Tang CY; Fane AG; Zhang J; Liu Y
Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(4):927-36. PubMed ID: 20182071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Development of thin-film composite forward osmosis hollow fiber membranes using direct sulfonated polyphenylenesulfone (sPPSU) as membrane substrates.
Zhong P; Fu X; Chung TS; Weber M; Maletzko C
Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Jul; 47(13):7430-6. PubMed ID: 23731192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Clean-In-Place (CIP) wastewater management using nanofiltration (NF)-forward osmosis (FO)-direct contact membrane distillation (DCMD): Effects of draw salt.
Kim WJ; Park HW; Heldman DR
Food Res Int; 2024 Feb; 178():113939. PubMed ID: 38309867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Relating reverse and forward solute diffusion to membrane fouling in osmotically driven membrane processes.
She Q; Jin X; Li Q; Tang CY
Water Res; 2012 May; 46(7):2478-86. PubMed ID: 22386887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Electrolysis-assisted mitigation of reverse solute flux in a three-chamber forward osmosis system.
Zou S; He Z
Water Res; 2017 May; 115():111-119. PubMed ID: 28259812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Polyoxometalate based thin film nanocomposite forward osmosis membrane: Superhydrophilic, anti-fouling, and high water permeable.
Shakeri A; Salehi H; Ghorbani F; Amini M; Naslhajian H
J Colloid Interface Sci; 2019 Feb; 536():328-338. PubMed ID: 30380432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Novel organic draw solution in forward osmosis process for fertigation: performance evaluation and flux prediction.
Al Bazedi G; Soliman N; Sewilam H
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Sep; 29(45):68881-68891. PubMed ID: 35554813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. pH-Responsive Polyoxometalates that Achieve Efficient Wastewater Reclamation and Source Recovery via Forward Osmosis.
Shi Y; Liao X; Chen R; Ge Q
Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Sep; 55(18):12664-12671. PubMed ID: 34494436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A novel concept of Vertical Up-Flow Forward Osmosis reactor: Design, performance and evaluation.
Patel A; Mungray AK; Mungray A
Chemosphere; 2021 Oct; 281():130741. PubMed ID: 34015655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Environmental sustainability of forward osmosis: The role of draw solute and its management.
Giagnorio M; Casasso A; Tiraferri A
Environ Int; 2021 Jul; 152():106498. PubMed ID: 33730633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Thermo-responsive nonionic amphiphilic copolymers as draw solutes in forward osmosis process for high-salinity water reclamation.
Xu Y; Wang YN; Chong JY; Wang R
Water Res; 2022 Aug; 221():118768. PubMed ID: 35752097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
