These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27690204)

  • 1. Introduction to the special series: Technology and disabilities in education.
    Bryant BR; Seok S
    Assist Technol; 2017; 29(3):121-122. PubMed ID: 27690204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assistive technology for postsecondary students with learning disabilities.
    Day SL; Edwards BJ
    J Learn Disabil; 1996 Sep; 29(5):486-92, 503. PubMed ID: 8870518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Model of Providing Assistive Technologies in Special Education Schools.
    Lersilp S; Putthinoi S; Chakpitak N
    Glob J Health Sci; 2015 May; 8(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 26234984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Middle school special education teachers' perceptions and use of assistive technology in literacy instruction.
    Flanagan S; Bouck EC; Richardson J
    Assist Technol; 2013; 25(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 23527428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stakeholders' views of the introduction of assistive technology in the classroom: How family-centred is Australian practice for students with cerebral palsy?
    Karlsson P; Johnston C; Barker K
    Child Care Health Dev; 2017 Jul; 43(4):598-607. PubMed ID: 28419501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Addressing assistive technology needs in special education.
    Shuster NE
    Am J Occup Ther; 1993 Nov; 47(11):993-7. PubMed ID: 8279506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An integrative review of the potential of wireless assistive technologies and internet of things (IoT) to improve accessibility to education for students with disabilities.
    Bright D
    Assist Technol; 2022 Nov; 34(6):653-660. PubMed ID: 34813714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Hollybank Challenges: AT for People with Profound Disabilities.
    King P; Ludi K; Mortimer D; Potter S
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2017; 242():351-354. PubMed ID: 28873822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Provision of Assistive Technology for Students with Disabilities in South African Higher Education.
    Ndlovu S
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Apr; 18(8):. PubMed ID: 33917670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of assistive technology in a public school setting.
    Watson AH; Ito M; Smith RO; Andersen LT
    Am J Occup Ther; 2010; 64(1):18-29. PubMed ID: 20131561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Special education for students with disabilities: analysis and recommendations.
    Terman DL; Larner MB; Stevenson CS; Behrman RE
    Future Child; 1996; 6(1):4-24. PubMed ID: 8689260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Teachers' perspectives of what works: Implementation of AT for students with disabilities.
    Chambers D; Jones P; Reese L; Wilcox C
    Assist Technol; 2022 May; 34(3):352-361. PubMed ID: 33395556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Application of assistive technology in inclusive classrooms.
    Zilz W; Pang Y
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2021 Oct; 16(7):684-686. PubMed ID: 31814471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The impact of assistive technology services in post-secondary education for students with disabilities: Intervention outcomes, use-profiles, and user-experiences.
    Malcolm MP; Roll MC
    Assist Technol; 2017; 29(2):91-98. PubMed ID: 27657934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Final priority; Rehabilitation Services Administration--Assistive Technology Alternative Financing Program. Final priority.
    Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, Department of Education
    Fed Regist; 2014 Aug; 79(157):47575-9. PubMed ID: 25167586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sources of payment for assistive technology: findings from a national survey of persons with disabilities.
    Carlson D; Ehrlich N
    Assist Technol; 2006; 18(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 16796243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Exploring assistive technology and post-school outcomes for students with severe disabilities.
    Bouck EC; Flanagan SM
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2016 Nov; 11(8):645-52. PubMed ID: 25815682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pruning a decision tree for selecting computer-related assistive devices for people with disabilities.
    Chi CF; Tseng LK; Jang Y
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2012 Jul; 20(4):564-73. PubMed ID: 22552588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Self-Assessment Framework for Inclusive Schools Supporting Assistive Technology Users.
    Hoogerwerf EJ; Solander-Gross A; Mavrou K; Traina I; Hersh M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2017; 242():820-827. PubMed ID: 28873891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assistive technology in developing countries: a review from the perspective of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
    Borg J; Lindström A; Larsson S
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2011 Mar; 35(1):20-9. PubMed ID: 21515886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.