BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

466 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27690282)

  • 1. Validation of a Chromosomal Microarray for Prenatal Diagnosis Using a Prospective Cohort of Pregnancies with Increased Risk for Chromosome Abnormalities.
    Wright D; Carey L; Battersby S; Nguyen T; Clarke M; Nash B; Gulesserian E; Cross J; Darmanian A
    Genet Test Mol Biomarkers; 2016 Dec; 20(12):791-798. PubMed ID: 27690282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prenatal diagnosis of fetuses with increased nuchal translucency using an approach based on quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction and genomic microarray.
    Pan M; Han J; Zhen L; Yang X; Li R; Liao C; Li DZ
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Feb; 197():164-7. PubMed ID: 26771907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnostic accuracy of the BACs-on-Beads™ assay versus karyotyping for prenatal detection of chromosomal abnormalities: a retrospective consecutive case series.
    Choy KW; Kwok YK; Cheng YK; Wong KM; Wong HK; Leung KO; Suen KW; Adler K; Wang CC; Lau TK; Schermer MJ; Lao TT; Leung TY
    BJOG; 2014 Sep; 121(10):1245-52. PubMed ID: 24893808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prospective chromosome analysis of 3429 amniocentesis samples in China using copy number variation sequencing.
    Wang J; Chen L; Zhou C; Wang L; Xie H; Xiao Y; Zhu H; Hu T; Zhang Z; Zhu Q; Liu Z; Liu S; Wang H; Xu M; Ren Z; Yu F; Cram DS; Liu H
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Sep; 219(3):287.e1-287.e18. PubMed ID: 29852155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic utility of microarray testing in pregnancy loss.
    Rosenfeld JA; Tucker ME; Escobar LF; Neill NJ; Torchia BS; McDaniel LD; Schultz RA; Chong K; Chitayat D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Oct; 46(4):478-86. PubMed ID: 25846569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Prenatal diagnosis of women with an adverse reproductive history using both traditional karyotyping and SNP-array].
    Yu HS; Guo H; Shen SS; Li XC; Zhang LP; Fan XF
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Mar; 53(3):155-159. PubMed ID: 29609228
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prenatal diagnosis by chromosomal microarray analysis.
    Levy B; Wapner R
    Fertil Steril; 2018 Feb; 109(2):201-212. PubMed ID: 29447663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rapid aneuploidy testing (knowing less) versus traditional karyotyping (knowing more) for advanced maternal age: what would be missed, who should decide?
    Leung WC; Lau ET; Lau WL; Tang R; Wong SF; Lau TK; Tse KT; Wong SF; To WK; Ng LK; Lao TT; Tang MH;
    Hong Kong Med J; 2008 Feb; 14(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 18239237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prenatal genetic diagnosis using microarray analysis in fetuses with congenital heart defects.
    Schmid M; Stary S; Blaicher W; Gollinger M; Husslein P; Streubel B
    Prenat Diagn; 2012 Apr; 32(4):376-82. PubMed ID: 22025351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnostic performance of quantitative fluorescence PCR analysis in high-risk pregnancies after combined first-trimester screening.
    Lildballe DL; Vogel I; Petersen OB; Vestergaard EM
    Dan Med J; 2014 Nov; 61(11):A4964. PubMed ID: 25370964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities in fetuses with abnormal cardiac ultrasound findings: evaluation of chromosomal microarray-based analysis.
    Mademont-Soler I; Morales C; Soler A; Martínez-Crespo JM; Shen Y; Margarit E; Clusellas N; Obón M; Wu BL; Sánchez A
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Apr; 41(4):375-82. PubMed ID: 23233332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Traditional karyotyping vs copy number variation sequencing for detection of chromosomal abnormalities associated with spontaneous miscarriage.
    Liu S; Song L; Cram DS; Xiong L; Wang K; Wu R; Liu J; Deng K; Jia B; Zhong M; Yang F
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Oct; 46(4):472-7. PubMed ID: 25767059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Confirmation and analysis of 2 398 positive results of cell-free fetal DNA].
    Zhao JH; Dai P; Zhu RN; Shi PL; Meng JJ; Kong XD
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Oct; 55(10):679-684. PubMed ID: 33120479
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Application of single nucleotide polymorphism array in prenatal diagnosis for fetuses with abnormal ultrasound findings].
    Guo YL; Wang L; Xue SW; Qu SZ; Yang J; Xu H; Bai ZX; Liu N; Kong XD
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Jul; 53(7):464-470. PubMed ID: 30078256
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dilemmas in genetic counseling for low-penetrance neuro-susceptibility loci detected on prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis.
    Brabbing-Goldstein D; Reches A; Svirsky R; Bar-Shira A; Yaron Y
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 218(2):247.e1-247.e12. PubMed ID: 29146387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical validation of a noninvasive prenatal test for genomewide detection of fetal copy number variants.
    Lefkowitz RB; Tynan JA; Liu T; Wu Y; Mazloom AR; Almasri E; Hogg G; Angkachatchai V; Zhao C; Grosu DS; McLennan G; Ehrich M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Aug; 215(2):227.e1-227.e16. PubMed ID: 26899906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Identification of submicroscopic chromosomal aberrations in fetuses with increased nuchal translucency and apparently normal karyotype.
    Leung TY; Vogel I; Lau TK; Chong W; Hyett JA; Petersen OB; Choy KW
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Sep; 38(3):314-9. PubMed ID: 21400624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Application of multiplex quantitative fluorescent PCR with non-polymorphic loci in prenatal diagnosis].
    Zhu XY; Hu YL; Wang YP; Zhu HY; Li J; Zhu RF; Zhang Y; Wu X; Yang Y
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Nov; 43(11):818-23. PubMed ID: 19087563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Whole-genome microarray analysis in prenatal specimens identifies clinically significant chromosome alterations without increase in results of unclear significance compared to targeted microarray.
    Coppinger J; Alliman S; Lamb AN; Torchia BS; Bejjani BA; Shaffer LG
    Prenat Diagn; 2009 Dec; 29(12):1156-66. PubMed ID: 19795450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of array genomic hybridization technology in prenatal diagnosis in Canada.
    Duncan A; Langlois S; ;
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2011 Dec; 33(12):1256-9. PubMed ID: 22166281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.