These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27690494)

  • 21. Age-related decline of precision and binding in visual working memory.
    Peich MC; Husain M; Bays PM
    Psychol Aging; 2013 Sep; 28(3):729-43. PubMed ID: 23978008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. "Dual-task costs in working memory: An adversarial collaboration": Correction to Doherty et al. (2018).
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Sep; 45(9):1568. PubMed ID: 31436445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessing working memory capacity through picture span and feature binding with visual-graphic symbols during a visual search task with typical children and adults.
    Wagner BT; Shaffer LA; Ivanson OA; Jones JA
    Augment Altern Commun; 2021 Mar; 37(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 33559490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Retrospective cues based on object features improve visual working memory performance in older adults.
    Gilchrist AL; Duarte A; Verhaeghen P
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2016; 23(2):184-95. PubMed ID: 26208404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Consequence of stroke for feature recall and binding in visual working memory.
    Lugtmeijer S; Schneegans S; Lammers NA; Geerligs L; de Leeuw FE; de Haan EHF; Bays PM; Kessels RPC
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2021 Mar; 179():107387. PubMed ID: 33460791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Levels of specificity in episodic memory: Insights from response accuracy and subjective confidence ratings in older adults and in younger adults under full or divided attention.
    Greene NR; Chism S; Naveh-Benjamin M
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Apr; 151(4):804-819. PubMed ID: 34618537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Existing knowledge of linguistic structure mitigates associative memory deficits in older adults.
    Smyth AC; Naveh-Benjamin M
    Exp Aging Res; 2018; 44(1):35-47. PubMed ID: 29303425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Asymmetrical access to color and location in visual working memory.
    Rajsic J; Wilson DE
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Oct; 76(7):1902-13. PubMed ID: 25190322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Conceptual information of meaningful objects is stored incidentally.
    Chung YH; Tam J; Wyble B; Störmer VS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38573722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. What does visual suffix interference tell us about spatial location in working memory?
    Allen RJ; Castellà J; Ueno T; Hitch GJ; Baddeley AD
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Jan; 43(1):133-42. PubMed ID: 25030081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Memory for important item-location associations in younger and older adults.
    Siegel ALM; Castel AD
    Psychol Aging; 2018 Feb; 33(1):30-45. PubMed ID: 29494176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Feature-based guidance of attention by visual working memory is applied independently of remembered object location.
    Hollingworth A; Bahle B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jan; 82(1):98-108. PubMed ID: 31140137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Assessing the associative deficit of older adults in long-term and short-term/working memory.
    Chen T; Naveh-Benjamin M
    Psychol Aging; 2012 Sep; 27(3):666-82. PubMed ID: 22308997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Neurocognitive mechanisms of guided item and associative encoding in young and older adults.
    Kamp SM
    Brain Cogn; 2020 Nov; 145():105626. PubMed ID: 32932106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Guidance of attention from visual working memory is feature-based, not object-based: Implications for models of feature binding.
    Thayer DD; Bahle B; Hollingworth A
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 May; 151(5):1018-1034. PubMed ID: 34735186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Different types of associative encoding evoke differential processing in both younger and older adults: Evidence from univariate and multivariate analyses.
    Dennis NA; Overman AA; Gerver CR; McGraw KE; Rowley MA; Salerno JM
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Dec; 135():107240. PubMed ID: 31682927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Role of time in binding features in visual working memory.
    Schneegans S; McMaster JMV; Bays PM
    Psychol Rev; 2023 Jan; 130(1):137-154. PubMed ID: 35099211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Developmental change in proactive interference across the life span: evidence from two working memory tasks.
    Loosli SV; Rahm B; Unterrainer JM; Weiller C; Kaller CP
    Dev Psychol; 2014 Apr; 50(4):1060-72. PubMed ID: 24294883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Why does visual working memory ability improve with age: More objects, more feature detail, or both? A registered report.
    Forsberg A; Adams EJ; Cowan N
    Dev Sci; 2023 Mar; 26(2):e13283. PubMed ID: 35611884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Can children prioritize more valuable information in working memory? An exploration into the effects of motivation and memory load.
    Atkinson AL; Waterman AH; Allen RJ
    Dev Psychol; 2019 May; 55(5):967-980. PubMed ID: 30816725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.