BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

352 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27692108)

  • 21. Clinical results of trochanteric fractures treated with the TARGON® proximal femur intramedullary nailing fixation system.
    Kawatani Y; Nishida K; Anraku Y; Kunitake K; Tsutsumi Y
    Injury; 2011 Sep; 42 Suppl 4():S22-7. PubMed ID: 21939799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Displaced trochanteric fragments lead to poor functional outcome in pertrochanteric fractures treated by cephalomedullary nails.
    Studer P; Suhm N; Wang Q; Rosenthal R; Saleh HA; Jakob M
    Injury; 2015 Dec; 46(12):2384-8. PubMed ID: 26454629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Pre-operative factors associated with increased mortality in elderly patients with a hip fracture: A cohort study in a developing country.
    Espinosa KA; Gélvez AG; Torres LP; García MF; Peña OR
    Injury; 2018 Jun; 49(6):1162-1168. PubMed ID: 29674111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Minimally invasive sliding hip screw insertion technique.
    Khan AZ; Parker MJ
    Hip Int; 2012; 22(2):214-7. PubMed ID: 22547374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Implementing the Surgical Apgar Score in patients with trauma hip fracture.
    Sakan S; Pavlovic DB; Milosevic M; Virag I; Martinovic P; Dobric I; Davila S; Peric M
    Injury; 2015 Nov; 46 Suppl 6():S61-6. PubMed ID: 26549669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Complications and fixation techniques of trochanteric fractures with the TARGON(®) PF.
    Takigawa N; Moriuchi H; Abe M; Yasui K; Eshiro H; Kinoshita M
    Injury; 2014 Jan; 45 Suppl 1():S44-8. PubMed ID: 24252573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures in geriatric patients treated with the DLT trochanteric nail.
    Temiz A; Durak A; Atici T
    Injury; 2015 Jul; 46 Suppl 2():S41-6. PubMed ID: 26021665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effect of delay to surgery on morbidity, mortality and length of stay following periprosthetic fracture around the hip.
    Johnson-Lynn S; Ngu A; Holland J; Carluke I; Fearon P
    Injury; 2016 Mar; 47(3):725-7. PubMed ID: 26653266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Functional recovery of elderly patients with surgically-treated intertrochanteric fractures: preliminary results of a randomised trial comparing the dynamic hip screw and proximal femoral nail techniques.
    Guerra MT; Pasqualin S; Souza MP; Lenz R
    Injury; 2014 Nov; 45 Suppl 5():S26-31. PubMed ID: 25528621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A multicentre, prospective, randomised comparison of the sliding hip screw with the Medoff sliding screw and side plate for unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures.
    McCormack R; Panagiotopolous K; Buckley R; Penner M; Perey B; Pate G; Goetz T; Piper M
    Injury; 2013 Dec; 44(12):1904-9. PubMed ID: 23876624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Does integrity of the lesser trochanter influence the surgical outcome of intertrochanteric fracture in elderly patients?
    Liu X; Liu Y; Pan S; Cao H; Yu D
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 Mar; 16():47. PubMed ID: 25879412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cephalomedullary nail versus sliding hip screw for unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients.
    Chua IT; Rajamoney GN; Kwek EB
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2013 Dec; 21(3):308-12. PubMed ID: 24366790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Reverse oblique intertrochanteric femoral fractures treated with the intramedullary hip screw (IMHS).
    Chou DT; Taylor AM; Boulton C; Moran CG
    Injury; 2012 Jun; 43(6):817-21. PubMed ID: 22040693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. TRIGEN INTERTAN intramedullary nail versus sliding hip screw: a prospective, randomized multicenter study on pain, function, and complications in 684 patients with an intertrochanteric or subtrochanteric fracture and one year of follow-up.
    Matre K; Vinje T; Havelin LI; Gjertsen JE; Furnes O; Espehaug B; Kjellevold SH; Fevang JM
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Feb; 95(3):200-8. PubMed ID: 23389782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Ninety-day mortality after intertrochanteric hip fracture: does provider volume matter?
    Forte ML; Virnig BA; Swiontkowski MF; Bhandari M; Feldman R; Eberly LE; Kane RL
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Apr; 92(4):799-806. PubMed ID: 20360501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Urinary catheterisation and deep wound infection after hip fracture surgery.
    Cumming D; Parker MJ
    Int Orthop; 2007 Aug; 31(4):483-5. PubMed ID: 16909250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Delay in Hip Fracture Surgery: An Analysis of Patient-Specific and Hospital-Specific Risk Factors.
    Ryan DJ; Yoshihara H; Yoneoka D; Egol KA; Zuckerman JD
    J Orthop Trauma; 2015 Aug; 29(8):343-8. PubMed ID: 25714442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of compression hip screw and gamma nail for treatment of peritrochanteric fractures.
    Bess RJ; Jolly SA
    J South Orthop Assoc; 1997; 6(3):173-9. PubMed ID: 9322196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Sliding hip screw fixation of trochanteric hip fractures: outcome of 1024 procedures.
    Chirodian N; Arch B; Parker MJ
    Injury; 2005 Jun; 36(6):793-800. PubMed ID: 15910836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Are the current guidelines for surgical delay in hip fractures too rigid? A single center assessment of mortality and economics.
    Kempenaers K; Van Calster B; Vandoren C; Sermon A; Metsemakers WJ; Vanderschot P; Misselyn D; Nijs S; Hoekstra H
    Injury; 2018 Jun; 49(6):1169-1175. PubMed ID: 29609969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.