259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27692852)
1. Pragmatic Language Interpretation as Probabilistic Inference.
Goodman ND; Frank MC
Trends Cogn Sci; 2016 Nov; 20(11):818-829. PubMed ID: 27692852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Online pragmatic interpretations of scalar adjectives are affected by perceived speaker reliability.
Gardner B; Dix S; Lawrence R; Morgan C; Sullivan A; Kurumada C
PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0245130. PubMed ID: 33606683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Inferring word meanings by assuming that speakers are informative.
Frank MC; Goodman ND
Cogn Psychol; 2014 Dec; 75():80-96. PubMed ID: 25238461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Measuring the importance of context when modeling language comprehension.
Garten J; Kennedy B; Sagae K; Dehghani M
Behav Res Methods; 2019 Apr; 51(2):480-492. PubMed ID: 30784019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Knowledge and implicature: modeling language understanding as social cognition.
Goodman ND; Stuhlmüller A
Top Cogn Sci; 2013 Jan; 5(1):173-84. PubMed ID: 23335578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The strategic use of noise in pragmatic reasoning.
Bergen L; Goodman ND
Top Cogn Sci; 2015 Apr; 7(2):336-50. PubMed ID: 25898999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Logic, Probability, and Pragmatics in Syllogistic Reasoning.
Tessler MH; Tenenbaum JB; Goodman ND
Top Cogn Sci; 2022 Jul; 14(3):574-601. PubMed ID: 35005842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Are Narrow Focus Exhaustivity Inferences Bayesian Inferences?
Schreiber A; Onea E
Front Psychol; 2021; 12():677223. PubMed ID: 34421732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reevaluating pragmatic reasoning in language games.
Sikos L; Venhuizen NJ; Drenhaus H; Crocker MW
PLoS One; 2021; 16(3):e0248388. PubMed ID: 33730097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Exhaustivity and Anti-Exhaustivity in the RSA Framework: Testing the Effect of Prior Beliefs.
Cremers A; Wilcox EG; Spector B
Cogn Sci; 2023 May; 47(5):e13286. PubMed ID: 37170678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comprehenders model the nature of noise in the environment.
Ryskin R; Futrell R; Kiran S; Gibson E
Cognition; 2018 Dec; 181():141-150. PubMed ID: 30195136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Informationally redundant utterances elicit pragmatic inferences.
Kravtchenko E; Demberg V
Cognition; 2022 Aug; 225():105159. PubMed ID: 35580451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Probabilistic pragmatics explains gradience and focality in natural language quantification.
van Tiel B; Franke M; Sauerland U
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Mar; 118(9):. PubMed ID: 33619084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Meaning as mentalization.
Forgács B
Front Hum Neurosci; 2024; 18():1384116. PubMed ID: 38855407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Four-year-olds incorporate speaker knowledge into pragmatic inferences.
Kampa A; Papafragou A
Dev Sci; 2020 May; 23(3):e12920. PubMed ID: 31693776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Warm (for Winter): Inferring Comparison Classes in Communication.
Tessler MH; Goodman ND
Cogn Sci; 2022 Mar; 46(3):e13095. PubMed ID: 35297089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Coevolution of Lexical Meaning and Pragmatic Use.
Brochhagen T; Franke M; van Rooij R
Cogn Sci; 2018 Nov; 42(8):2757-2789. PubMed ID: 30294804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Approaching human language with complex networks.
Cong J; Liu H
Phys Life Rev; 2014 Dec; 11(4):598-618. PubMed ID: 24794524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Nonliteral understanding of number words.
Kao JT; Wu JY; Bergen L; Goodman ND
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Aug; 111(33):12002-7. PubMed ID: 25092304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The communicative style of a speaker can affect language comprehension? ERP evidence from the comprehension of irony.
Regel S; Coulson S; Gunter TC
Brain Res; 2010 Jan; 1311():121-35. PubMed ID: 19900421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
