These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27693076)

  • 1. Comparison of Metal and Plastic Disposable Laryngoscope Blade with Reusable Macintosh Blade in Difficult and Inhalation Injury Airway Scenario: A Manikin Study.
    Moritz A; Heinrich S; Irouschek A; Birkholz T; Prottengeier J; Schmidt J
    J Emerg Med; 2017 Jan; 52(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 27693076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Xenon with LED illuminant in difficult and inhalation injury airway scenario: A randomized crossover manikin study.
    Moritz A; Prottengeier J; Schmidt J
    Am J Emerg Med; 2017 Nov; 35(11):1639-1644. PubMed ID: 28527873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the C-MAC Videolaryngoscope and Rigid Fiberscope with Direct Laryngoscopy in Easy and Difficult Airway Scenarios: A Manikin Study.
    Kaplan A; Göksu E; Yıldız G; Kılıç T
    J Emerg Med; 2016 Mar; 50(3):e107-14. PubMed ID: 26725922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A randomized comparison of the Laryngoscope with Fiber Optic Reusable Flexible Tip English Macintosh blade to the conventional Macintosh laryngoscope for intubation in simulated easy and difficult child airway with chest compression scenarios.
    Szarpak Ł; Karczewska K; Czyżewski Ł; Kurowski A
    Am J Emerg Med; 2015 Jul; 33(7):951-6. PubMed ID: 25936475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Macintosh, McCoy and C-MAC D-Blade video laryngoscope intubation by prehospital emergency health workers: a simulation study.
    Yildirim A; Kiraz HA; Ağaoğlu İ; Akdur O
    Intern Emerg Med; 2017 Feb; 12(1):91-97. PubMed ID: 27001885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of plastic single-use with metallic reusable laryngoscope blades for out-of-hospital tracheal intubation.
    Jabre P; Leroux B; Brohon S; Penet C; Lockey D; Adnet F; Margenet A; Marty J; Combes X
    Ann Emerg Med; 2007 Sep; 50(3):258-63. PubMed ID: 17583382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of the Truview PCD and the GlideScope Cobalt AVL video-laryngoscopes to the Miller blade for successfully intubating manikins simulating normal and difficult pediatric airways.
    Hippard HK; Kalyani G; Olutoye OA; Mann DG; Watcha MF
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2016 Jun; 26(6):613-20. PubMed ID: 27083381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Bullard and Airtraq laryngoscopes with conventional laryngoscopy in a manikin study of simulated difficult intubation.
    Legrand MA; Steinmann D; Priebe HJ; Mols G
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2012 Jul; 29(7):343-50. PubMed ID: 22569030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Comparison of five video laryngoscopes and conventional direct laryngoscopy : Investigations on simple and simulated difficult airways on the intubation trainer].
    Ruetzler K; Imach S; Weiss M; Haas T; Schmidt AR
    Anaesthesist; 2015 Jul; 64(7):513-9. PubMed ID: 26174747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A randomised crossover trial comparing the Airtraq(®) NT, McGrath(®) MAC and Macintosh laryngoscopes for nasotracheal intubation of simulated easy and difficult airways in a manikin.
    Gómez-Ríos MÁ; Pinegger S; de Carrillo Mantilla M; Vizcaino L; Barreto-Calvo P; Paech MJ; Gómez-Ríos D; López-Calviño B
    Braz J Anesthesiol; 2016; 66(3):289-97. PubMed ID: 27108827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the king vision video laryngoscope with the macintosh laryngoscope.
    Murphy LD; Kovacs GJ; Reardon PM; Law JA
    J Emerg Med; 2014 Aug; 47(2):239-46. PubMed ID: 24742495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of two hyperangulated video laryngoscope blades to direct laryngoscopy in a simulated infant airway: a bicentric, comparative, randomized manikin study.
    Kriege M; Pirlich N; Ott T; Wittenmeier E; Dette F
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2018 Aug; 18(1):119. PubMed ID: 30170540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of the Trachway intubating stylet and the Macintosh laryngoscope in tracheal intubation: a manikin study.
    Hung KC; Tan PH; Lin VC; Wang HK; Chen HS
    J Anesth; 2013 Apr; 27(2):205-10. PubMed ID: 23053462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Straight video blades are advantageous than curved blades in simulated pediatric difficult intubation.
    Saracoglu KT; Eti Z; Kavas AD; Umuroglu T
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2014 Mar; 24(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 24215652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A randomised, crossover study of the Dorges, McCoy and Macintosh laryngoscope blades in a simulated difficult intubation scenario.
    Sethuraman D; Darshane S; Guha A; Charters P
    Anaesthesia; 2006 May; 61(5):482-7. PubMed ID: 16674625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Macintosh and Intubrite laryngoscopes for intubation performed by novice physicians in a difficult airway scenario.
    Szarpak L; Smereka J; Ladny JR
    Am J Emerg Med; 2017 May; 35(5):796-797. PubMed ID: 28139309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the Macintosh laryngoscope and blind intubation via the iGEL for Intubation With C-spine immobilization: A Randomized, crossover, manikin trial.
    Gawlowski P; Smereka J; Madziala M; Szarpak L; Frass M; Robak O
    Am J Emerg Med; 2017 Mar; 35(3):484-487. PubMed ID: 28041757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Randomized evaluation of the performance of single-use laryngoscopes in simulated easy and difficult intubation.
    Twigg SJ; McCormick B; Cook TM
    Br J Anaesth; 2003 Jan; 90(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 12488371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A new universal laryngoscope blade: a preliminary comparison with Macintosh laryngoscope blades.
    Gerlach K; Wenzel V; von Knobelsdorff G; Steinfath M; Dörges V
    Resuscitation; 2003 Apr; 57(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 12668301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of the forces exerted during laryngoscopy using disposable and non-disposable laryngoscope blades.
    Evans A; Vaughan RS; Hall JE; Mecklenburgh J; Wilkes AR
    Anaesthesia; 2003 Sep; 58(9):869-73. PubMed ID: 12911359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.