These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27693271)
1. An analysis of pose in 3D stereophotogrammetry of the breast. Hameeteman M; Verhulst AC; Maal TJ; Ulrich DJ J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2016 Dec; 69(12):1609-1613. PubMed ID: 27693271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 3D stereophotogrammetry in upper-extremity lymphedema: An accurate diagnostic method. Hameeteman M; Verhulst AC; Vreeken RD; Maal TJ; Ulrich DJ J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2016 Feb; 69(2):241-7. PubMed ID: 26590631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Objective evaluation of the latissimus dorsi flap for breast reconstruction using three-dimensional imaging. Henseler H; Smith J; Bowman A; Khambay BS; Ju X; Ayoub A; Ray AK J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2012 Sep; 65(9):1209-15. PubMed ID: 22525253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multi-view stereophotogrammetry for post-mastectomy breast reconstruction. Ju X; Henseler H; Peng MJ; Khambay BS; Ray AK; Ayoub AF Med Biol Eng Comput; 2016 Mar; 54(2-3):475-84. PubMed ID: 26133282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development of a three-dimensional hand model using 3D stereophotogrammetry: Evaluation of landmark reproducibility. Hoevenaren IA; Maal TJ; Krikken E; de Haan AF; Bergé SJ; Ulrich DJ J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 May; 68(5):709-16. PubMed ID: 25665488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Preoperative implant selection for unilateral breast reconstruction using 3D imaging with the Microsoft Kinect sensor. Pöhlmann STL; Harkness E; Taylor CJ; Gandhi A; Astley SM J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2017 Aug; 70(8):1059-1067. PubMed ID: 28595842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The importance of the pose in three-dimensional imaging of the ptotic breast. Henseler H; Ju X; Ayoub A; Ray AK J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Nov; 66(11):1551-6. PubMed ID: 23849983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. 3D analysis of breast augmentation defines operative changes and their relationship to implant dimensions. Tepper OM; Small KH; Unger JG; Feldman DL; Kumar N; Choi M; Karp NS Ann Plast Surg; 2009 May; 62(5):570-5. PubMed ID: 19387164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Registration of 3-dimensional facial photographs for clinical use. Maal TJ; van Loon B; Plooij JM; Rangel F; Ettema AM; Borstlap WA; Bergé SJ J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Oct; 68(10):2391-401. PubMed ID: 20708318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The possibilities of a portable low-budget three-dimensional stereophotogrammetry system in neonates: a prospective growth analysis and analysis of accuracy. Ritschl LM; Roth M; Fichter AM; Mittermeier F; Kuschel B; Wolff KD; Grill FD; Loeffelbein DJ Head Face Med; 2018 Aug; 14(1):11. PubMed ID: 30075821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of skin tone on the accuracy of hybrid and passive stereophotogrammetry. Wesselius TS; Verhulst AC; Xi T; Ulrich DJO; Maal TJJ J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2019 Sep; 72(9):1564-1569. PubMed ID: 31229406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development and reproducibility of a 3D stereophotogrammetric reference frame for facial soft tissue growth of babies and young children with and without orofacial clefts. Brons S; van Beusichem ME; Maal TJ; Plooij JM; Bronkhorst EM; Bergé SJ; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jan; 42(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 22920646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The accuracy of matching three-dimensional photographs with skin surfaces derived from cone-beam computed tomography. Maal TJ; Plooij JM; Rangel FA; Mollemans W; Schutyser FA; Bergé SJ Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jul; 37(7):641-6. PubMed ID: 18539435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-dimensional evaluation of breast augmentation and the influence of anatomic and round implants on operative breast shape changes. Kovacs L; Eder M; Zimmermann A; Müller D; Schuster T; Papadopulos NA; Biemer E; Klöppel M; Machens HG Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2012 Aug; 36(4):879-87. PubMed ID: 22535137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Re-defining pseudoptosis from a 3D perspective after short scar-medial pedicle reduction mammaplasty. Small KH; Tepper OM; Unger JG; Kumar N; Feldman DL; Choi M; Karp NS J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2010 Feb; 63(2):346-53. PubMed ID: 19091641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical accuracy and reproducibility of Portrait 3D Surgical Simulation Platform in breast augmentation. Mailey B; Freel A; Wong R; Pointer DT; Khoobehi K Aesthet Surg J; 2013 Jan; 33(1):84-92. PubMed ID: 23220877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development of a Three-Dimensional Hand Model Using Three-Dimensional Stereophotogrammetry: Assessment of Image Reproducibility. Hoevenaren IA; Meulstee J; Krikken E; Bergé SJ; Ulrich DJ; Maal TJ PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0136710. PubMed ID: 26366860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Three dimensional measurement of rhinoplasty results. van Heerbeek N; Ingels KJ; van Loon B; Plooij JM; Bergé SJ Rhinology; 2009 Jun; 47(2):121-5. PubMed ID: 19593965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prediction of breast resection weight in reduction mammaplasty based on 3-dimensional surface imaging. Eder M; Grabhorn A; Waldenfels Fv; Schuster T; Papadopulos NA; Machens HG; Kovacs L Surg Innov; 2013 Aug; 20(4):356-64. PubMed ID: 22983806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is Unilateral Implant or Autologous Breast Reconstruction Better in Obtaining Breast Symmetry? Cohen O; Small K; Lee C; Petruolo O; Karp N; Choi M Breast J; 2016; 22(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 26534828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]