301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27693732)
21. The Lumbar Spine Outcomes Questionnaire: its development and psychometric properties.
Bendebba M; Dizerega GS; Long DM
Spine J; 2007; 7(1):118-32. PubMed ID: 17197345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Development of a French-Canadian version of the Oswestry Disability Index: cross-cultural adaptation and validation.
Denis I; Fortin L
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Apr; 37(7):E439-44. PubMed ID: 22037523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Validation of the Arabic version of the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale.
Alnahhal A; May S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Dec; 37(26):E1645-50. PubMed ID: 23038622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Development, validity, and reliability of The Assessment of Pain and Occupational Performance (POP): a new instrument using two dimensions in the investigation of disability in back pain.
Perneros G; Tropp H
Spine J; 2009 Jun; 9(6):486-98. PubMed ID: 19398217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. An analysis from the Quality Outcomes Database, Part 1. Disability, quality of life, and pain outcomes following lumbar spine surgery: predicting likely individual patient outcomes for shared decision-making.
McGirt MJ; Bydon M; Archer KR; Devin CJ; Chotai S; Parker SL; Nian H; Harrell FE; Speroff T; Dittus RS; Philips SE; Shaffrey CI; Foley KT; Asher AL
J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Oct; 27(4):357-369. PubMed ID: 28498074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Is It Time to Replace the Oswestry Index With PROMIS Physical Function Computer Adaptive Test?
Rijk L; Kortlever JTP; Tipton GW; Ring D; Queralt MV;
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2020 Sep; 101(9):1549-1555. PubMed ID: 32376327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Danish version of the Oswestry Disability Index for patients with low back pain. Part 1: Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity in two different populations.
Lauridsen HH; Hartvigsen J; Manniche C; Korsholm L; Grunnet-Nilsson N
Eur Spine J; 2006 Nov; 15(11):1705-16. PubMed ID: 16736204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. West China hospital set of measures in Chinese to evaluate back pain treatment.
Volinn E; Yang B; He J; Sheng X; Ying J; Volinn W; Zhang J; Zuo Y
Pain Med; 2010 May; 11(5):637-47. PubMed ID: 20546508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Validity and reliability of English and Marathi Oswestry Disability Index (version 2.1a) in Indian population.
Joshi VD; Raiturker PP; Kulkarni AA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 May; 38(11):E662-8. PubMed ID: 23380824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The Oswestry Disability Index, the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale: translation and validation studies of the Iranian versions.
Mousavi SJ; Parnianpour M; Mehdian H; Montazeri A; Mobini B
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Jun; 31(14):E454-9. PubMed ID: 16778675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Estimating EQ-5D values from the Oswestry Disability Index and numeric rating scales for back and leg pain.
Carreon LY; Bratcher KR; Das N; Nienhuis JB; Glassman SD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Apr; 39(8):678-82. PubMed ID: 24480944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Oswestry Disability Index: Is Telephone Administration Valid?
Martin CT; Yaszemski AK; Ledonio CGT; Barrack TC; Polly DW
Iowa Orthop J; 2019; 39(2):92-94. PubMed ID: 32577114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Psychometric properties of the Oswestry Disability Index.
Saltychev M; Mattie R; McCormick Z; Bärlund E; Laimi K
Int J Rehabil Res; 2017 Sep; 40(3):202-208. PubMed ID: 28368870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Is the Patient Activation Measure a valid measure of osteoarthritis self-management attitudes and capabilities? Results of a Rasch analysis.
Eyles JP; Ferreira M; Mills K; Lucas BR; Robbins SR; Williams M; Lee H; Appleton S; Hunter DJ
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2020 May; 18(1):121. PubMed ID: 32370751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The pain disability questionnaire: a new psychometrically sound measure for chronic musculoskeletal disorders.
Anagnostis C; Gatchel RJ; Mayer TG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Oct; 29(20):2290-302; discussion 2303. PubMed ID: 15480144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Sex life and the Oswestry Disability Index.
Costa M; Marshman LA
Spine J; 2015 Jun; 15(6):1225-32. PubMed ID: 25708794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Craniofacial pain and disability inventory (CF-PDI): development and psychometric validation of a new questionnaire.
La Touche R; Pardo-Montero J; Gil-Martínez A; Paris-Alemany A; Angulo-Díaz-Parreño S; Suárez-Falcón JC; Lara-Lara M; Fernández-Carnero J
Pain Physician; 2014; 17(1):95-108. PubMed ID: 24452650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Testing minimal clinically important difference: consensus or conundrum?
Gatchel RJ; Mayer TG
Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):321-7. PubMed ID: 20362248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The Oswestry Disability Index, confirmatory factor analysis in a sample of 35,263 verifies a one-factor structure but practicality issues remain.
Gabel CP; Cuesta-Vargas A; Qian M; Vengust R; Berlemann U; Aghayev E; Melloh M
Eur Spine J; 2017 Aug; 26(8):2007-2013. PubMed ID: 28646454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A low back-specific version of the SF-36 Physical Functioning scale.
Davidson M; Keating JL; Eyres S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Mar; 29(5):586-94. PubMed ID: 15129079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
