225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27693936)
1. Online health information on obesity in pregnancy: a systematic review.
Al Wattar BH; Pidgeon C; Learner H; Zamora J; Thangaratinam S
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Nov; 206():147-152. PubMed ID: 27693936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Online health information on induction of labour: A systematic review and quality assessment study.
Ewington LJ; Vanes NK; Dewdney J; Al Wattar BH; Quenby S
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 Apr; 271():177-182. PubMed ID: 35219168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing the Accuracy and Readability of Online Health Information for Patients With Pancreatic Cancer.
Storino A; Castillo-Angeles M; Watkins AA; Vargas C; Mancias JD; Bullock A; Demirjian A; Moser AJ; Kent TS
JAMA Surg; 2016 Sep; 151(9):831-7. PubMed ID: 27144966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of websites that contain information relating to malaria in pregnancy.
Hamwela V; Ahmed W; Bath PA
Public Health; 2018 Apr; 157():50-52. PubMed ID: 29477789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How evidence-based is the information on the internet about nausea and vomiting of pregnancy?
Sacks S; Abenhaim HA
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2013 Aug; 35(8):697-703. PubMed ID: 24007704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing the readability, quality and accuracy of online health information for patients with low anterior resection syndrome following surgery for rectal cancer.
Garfinkle R; Wong-Chong N; Petrucci A; Sylla P; Wexner SD; Bhatnagar S; Morin N; Boutros M
Colorectal Dis; 2019 May; 21(5):523-531. PubMed ID: 30609222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluating the quality of perinatal anxiety information available online.
Kirby PL; Reynolds KA; Walker JR; Furer P; Pryor TAM
Arch Womens Ment Health; 2018 Dec; 21(6):813-820. PubMed ID: 29931445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. ANALYSIS OF INFORMATION CONTENT AND GENERAL QUALITY OF OBESITY AND EATING DISORDERS WEBSITES.
Hernández-Morante JJ; Jiménez-Rodríguez D; Cañavate R; Conesa-Fuentes Mdel C
Nutr Hosp; 2015 Aug; 32(2):606-15. PubMed ID: 26268088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Web-based information on the treatment of oral leukoplakia - quality and readability.
Wiriyakijja P; Fedele S; Porter S; Ni Riordain R
J Oral Pathol Med; 2016 Sep; 45(8):617-20. PubMed ID: 27233229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Readability of consumer health information on the internet: a comparison of U.S. government-funded and commercially funded websites.
Risoldi Cochrane Z; Gregory P; Wilson A
J Health Commun; 2012; 17(9):1003-10. PubMed ID: 22512714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Online information for women and their families regarding reduced fetal movements is of variable quality, readability and accountability.
Farrant K; Heazell AEP
Midwifery; 2016 Mar; 34():72-78. PubMed ID: 26867705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hidradenitis suppurativa gains increasing interest on World Wide Web: a source for patient information?
Hessam S; Salem J; Bechara FG; Haferkamp A; Heidenreich A; Paffenholz P; Sand M; Tsaur I; Borgmann H
Int J Dermatol; 2017 Jul; 56(7):726-732. PubMed ID: 28321845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quality of consumer-oriented websites containing information about the second trimester ultrasound examination during pregnancy.
Georgsson S; Carlsson T
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Apr; 20(1):235. PubMed ID: 32321482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Content and Quality of Health Information on the Internet for Patients and Families on Adult Kidney Cancer.
Alsaiari A; Joury A; Aljuaid M; Wazzan M; Pines JM
J Cancer Educ; 2017 Dec; 32(4):878-884. PubMed ID: 27130549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quality of online information on breast cancer treatment options.
Arif N; Ghezzi P
Breast; 2018 Feb; 37():6-12. PubMed ID: 29040893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Crowdsourcing and the Accuracy of Online Information Regarding Weight Gain in Pregnancy: A Descriptive Study.
Chang T; Verma BA; Shull T; Moniz MH; Kohatsu L; Plegue MA; Collins-Thompson K
J Med Internet Res; 2016 Apr; 18(4):e81. PubMed ID: 27056465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Breast reconstruction post mastectomy- Let's Google it. Accessibility, readability and quality of online information.
Lynch NP; Lang B; Angelov S; McGarrigle SA; Boyle TJ; Al-Azawi D; Connolly EM
Breast; 2017 Apr; 32():126-129. PubMed ID: 28178606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Inaccurate, inadequate and inconsistent: A content analysis of burn first aid information online.
Burgess JD; Cameron CM; Cuttle L; Tyack Z; Kimble RM
Burns; 2016 Dec; 42(8):1671-1677. PubMed ID: 27756588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of the Accuracy of Online Information Regarding Trigger Finger.
Hinds RM; Gottschalk MB; Muppavarapu RC; Naik AA; Yang SS; Capo JT
J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol; 2016 Jun; 21(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 27454633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quality of web-based information for osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional study.
Barrow A; Palmer S; Thomas S; Guy S; Brotherton J; Dear L; Pearson J
Physiotherapy; 2018 Sep; 104(3):318-326. PubMed ID: 30030036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
