These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27694106)

  • 1. Oviposition preferences for ethanol depend on spatial arrangement and differ dramatically among closely related Drosophila species.
    Sumethasorn M; Turner TL
    Biol Open; 2016 Nov; 5(11):1642-1647. PubMed ID: 27694106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ethanol confers differential protection against generalist and specialist parasitoids of Drosophila melanogaster.
    Lynch ZR; Schlenke TA; Morran LT; de Roode JC
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0180182. PubMed ID: 28700600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Natural variation in decision-making behavior in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Miller PM; Saltz JB; Cochrane VA; Marcinkowski CM; Mobin R; Turner TL
    PLoS One; 2011 Jan; 6(1):e16436. PubMed ID: 21283727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Alcohol consumption as self-medication against blood-borne parasites in the fruit fly.
    Milan NF; Kacsoh BZ; Schlenke TA
    Curr Biol; 2012 Mar; 22(6):488-93. PubMed ID: 22342747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Egg laying decisions in Drosophila are consistent with foraging costs of larval progeny.
    Schwartz NU; Zhong L; Bellemer A; Tracey WD
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(5):e37910. PubMed ID: 22693584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Differential responses to artificial selection on oviposition site preferences in Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.
    Soto EM; Betti MI; Hurtado J; Hasson E
    Insect Sci; 2015 Dec; 22(6):821-8. PubMed ID: 25263841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Olfactory preference for egg laying on citrus substrates in Drosophila.
    Dweck HK; Ebrahim SA; Kromann S; Bown D; Hillbur Y; Sachse S; Hansson BS; Stensmyr MC
    Curr Biol; 2013 Dec; 23(24):2472-80. PubMed ID: 24316206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evolution of behavioural and cellular defences against parasitoid wasps in the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup.
    Lynch ZR; Schlenke TA; de Roode JC
    J Evol Biol; 2016 May; 29(5):1016-29. PubMed ID: 26859227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Oviposition site preferences and performance in natural resources in the human commensals Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.
    Soto EM; Soto IM; Cortese MD; Hasson E
    Fly (Austin); 2011; 5(2):102-9. PubMed ID: 21540639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reciprocal latitudinal clines in oviposition behavior ofPapilio glaucus andP. canadensis across the Great Lakes hybrid zone: possible sex-linkage of oviposition preferences.
    Scriber JM; Giebink BL; Snider D
    Oecologia; 1991 Sep; 87(3):360-368. PubMed ID: 28313263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of Adh function on ethanol preference and tolerance in adult Drosophila melanogaster.
    Ogueta M; Cibik O; Eltrop R; Schneider A; Scholz H
    Chem Senses; 2010 Nov; 35(9):813-22. PubMed ID: 20739429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Preference for ethanol in feeding and oviposition in temperate and tropical populations of
    Zhu J; Fry JD
    Entomol Exp Appl; 2015 Apr; 155(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 29398715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inter- and intra-species variation in genome-wide gene expression of Drosophila in response to parasitoid wasp attack.
    Salazar-Jaramillo L; Jalvingh KM; de Haan A; Kraaijeveld K; Buermans H; Wertheim B
    BMC Genomics; 2017 Apr; 18(1):331. PubMed ID: 28449654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantitative and Discrete Evolutionary Changes in the Egg-Laying Behavior of Single
    Bräcker LB; Schmid CA; Bolini VA; Holz CA; Prud'homme B; Sirota A; Gompel N
    Front Behav Neurosci; 2019; 13():118. PubMed ID: 31191270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reducing Drosophila suzukii emergence through inter-species competition.
    Shaw B; Brain P; Wijnen H; Fountain MT
    Pest Manag Sci; 2018 Jun; 74(6):1466-1471. PubMed ID: 29266721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Alcohol tolerance: An ecological parameter in the relative success of Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans.
    McKenzie JA; Parsons PA
    Oecologia; 1972 Dec; 10(4):373-388. PubMed ID: 28307067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The making of a pest: Insights from the evolution of chemosensory receptor families in a pestiferous and invasive fly, Drosophila suzukii.
    Hickner PV; Rivaldi CL; Johnson CM; Siddappaji M; Raster GJ; Syed Z
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Aug; 17():648. PubMed ID: 27530109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Learning Influences Host Versus Nonhost Discrimination and Postalighting Searching Behavior in the Tephritid Fruit Fly Parasitoid Diachasmimorpha kraussii (Hymenoptera: Braconidae).
    Masry A; Clarke AR; Cunningham JP
    J Econ Entomol; 2018 Apr; 111(2):787-794. PubMed ID: 29490053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. GENETIC VARIATION IN CACTOPHILIC DROSOPHILA FOR OVIPOSITION ON NATURAL YEAST SUBSTRATES.
    Barker JSF
    Evolution; 1992 Aug; 46(4):1070-1083. PubMed ID: 28564399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Behavioral and circuit basis of sucrose rejection by Drosophila females in a simple decision-making task.
    Yang CH; He R; Stern U
    J Neurosci; 2015 Jan; 35(4):1396-410. PubMed ID: 25632118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.