478 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27694173)
1. Evaluation of Prostate Cancer Bone Metastases with 18F-NaF and 18F-Fluorocholine PET/CT.
Beheshti M; Rezaee A; Geinitz H; Loidl W; Pirich C; Langsteger W
J Nucl Med; 2016 Oct; 57(Suppl 3):55S-60S. PubMed ID: 27694173
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Combined 18F-fluorocholine and 18F-fluoride positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging for staging of high-risk prostate cancer.
Kjölhede H; Ahlgren G; Almquist H; Liedberg F; Lyttkens K; Ohlsson T; Bratt O
BJU Int; 2012 Nov; 110(10):1501-6. PubMed ID: 22502982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3.
Wondergem M; van der Zant FM; Knol RJJ; Burgers AMG; Bos SD; de Jong IJ; Pruim J
World J Urol; 2018 Jan; 36(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 29043431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prostate Cancer Lytic Bone Metastases Imaged With 18F-Fluorocholine PET/CT.
Alabed YZ
Clin Nucl Med; 2018 Mar; 43(3):220-221. PubMed ID: 29356739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Detection of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer by 18F fluorocholine and 18F fluoride PET-CT: a comparative study.
Beheshti M; Vali R; Waldenberger P; Fitz F; Nader M; Loidl W; Broinger G; Stoiber F; Foglman I; Langsteger W
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2008 Oct; 35(10):1766-74. PubMed ID: 18465129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6.
Langsteger W; Rezaee A; Pirich C; Beheshti M
Semin Nucl Med; 2016 Nov; 46(6):491-501. PubMed ID: 27825429
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [18F]fluoromethylcholine (FCH) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for lymph node staging of prostate cancer: a prospective study of 210 patients.
Poulsen MH; Bouchelouche K; Høilund-Carlsen PF; Petersen H; Gerke O; Steffansen SI; Marcussen N; Svolgaard N; Vach W; Geertsen U; Walter S
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11):1666-71. PubMed ID: 22520686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of
Gauthé M; Zarca K; Aveline C; Lecouvet F; Balogova S; Cussenot O; Talbot JN; Durand-Zaleski I
BMC Med Imaging; 2020 Mar; 20(1):25. PubMed ID: 32122345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9.
Sheikhbahaei S; Jones KM; Werner RA; Salas-Fragomeni RA; Marcus CV; Higuchi T; Rowe SP; Solnes LB; Javadi MS
Ann Nucl Med; 2019 May; 33(5):351-361. PubMed ID: 30877561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of Prostate Cancer with 11C- and 18F-Choline PET/CT: Diagnosis and Initial Staging.
Nitsch S; Hakenberg OW; Heuschkel M; Dräger D; Hildebrandt G; Krause BJ; Schwarzenböck SM
J Nucl Med; 2016 Oct; 57(Suppl 3):38S-42S. PubMed ID: 27694169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prospective comparative study of
Fonager RF; Zacho HD; Langkilde NC; Fledelius J; Ejlersen JA; Hendel HW; Haarmark C; Moe M; Mortensen JC; Jochumsen MR; Petersen LJ
Acta Oncol; 2018 Aug; 57(8):1063-1069. PubMed ID: 29447047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Role of 18F-Sodium Fluoride PET/CT Bone Scans in the Diagnosis of Metastatic Bone Disease from Breast and Prostate Cancer.
Kulshrestha RK; Vinjamuri S; England A; Nightingale J; Hogg P
J Nucl Med Technol; 2016 Dec; 44(4):217-222. PubMed ID: 27634981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. ¹⁸F-NaF PET/CT and ¹¹C-Choline PET/CT for the initial detection of metastatic disease in prostate cancer: overview and potential utilization.
Koo PJ; David Crawford E
Oncology (Williston Park); 2014 Dec; 28(12):1057-62, 1064-5. PubMed ID: 25738199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of sodium
Gauthé M; Aveline C; Lecouvet F; Michaud L; Rousseau C; Tassart M; Cussenot O; Talbot JN; Durand-Zaleski I
World J Urol; 2019 Aug; 37(8):1587-1595. PubMed ID: 30382380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of PSMA-PET/CT, choline-PET/CT, NaF-PET/CT, MRI, and bone scintigraphy in the diagnosis of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zhou J; Gou Z; Wu R; Yuan Y; Yu G; Zhao Y
Skeletal Radiol; 2019 Dec; 48(12):1915-1924. PubMed ID: 31127357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fluorocholine (18F) and sodium fluoride (18F) PET/CT in the detection of prostate cancer: prospective comparison of diagnostic performance determined by masked reading.
Langsteger W; Balogova S; Huchet V; Beheshti M; Paycha F; Egrot C; Janetschek G; Loidl W; Nataf V; Kerrou K; Pascal O; Cussenot O; Talbot JN
Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2011 Aug; 55(4):448-57. PubMed ID: 21738117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Superiority of 18F-FNa PET/CT for Detecting Bone Metastases in Comparison with Other Diagnostic Imaging Modalities].
Lapa P; Saraiva T; Silva R; Marques M; Costa G; Lima JP
Acta Med Port; 2017 Jan; 30(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 28501038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Observer Agreement and Accuracy of
Zacho HD; Fonager RF; Nielsen JB; Haarmark C; Hendel HW; Johansen MB; Mortensen JC; Petersen LJ
J Nucl Med; 2020 Mar; 61(3):344-349. PubMed ID: 31481577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Spine metastases in prostate cancer: comparison of technetium-99m-MDP whole-body bone scintigraphy, [(18) F]choline positron emission tomography(PET)/computed tomography (CT) and [(18) F]NaF PET/CT.
Poulsen MH; Petersen H; Høilund-Carlsen PF; Jakobsen JS; Gerke O; Karstoft J; Steffansen SI; Walter S
BJU Int; 2014 Dec; 114(6):818-23. PubMed ID: 24314065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The value of baseline 18F-sodium fluoride and 18F-choline PET activity for identifying responders to radium-223 treatment in castration-resistant prostate cancer bone metastases.
Donners R; Tunariu N; Tovey H; Hall E; Chua S; Cook G; Du Y; Blackledge MD; Parker CC; Koh DM
Eur Radiol; 2024 Feb; 34(2):1146-1154. PubMed ID: 37615760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
