These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27694466)

  • 1. Conducting Meta-Analyses Based on p Values: Reservations and Recommendations for Applying p-Uniform and p-Curve.
    van Aert RC; Wicherts JM; van Assen MA
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2016 Sep; 11(5):713-729. PubMed ID: 27694466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Meta-analysis using effect size distributions of only statistically significant studies.
    van Assen MA; van Aert RC; Wicherts JM
    Psychol Methods; 2015 Sep; 20(3):293-309. PubMed ID: 25401773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. p-Hacking and publication bias interact to distort meta-analytic effect size estimates.
    Friese M; Frankenbach J
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Aug; 25(4):456-471. PubMed ID: 31789538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis: An Evaluation of Selection Methods and Some Cautionary Notes.
    McShane BB; Böckenholt U; Hansen KT
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2016 Sep; 11(5):730-749. PubMed ID: 27694467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of publication bias on the Q test and assessment of heterogeneity.
    Augusteijn HEM; van Aert RCM; van Assen MALM
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Feb; 24(1):116-134. PubMed ID: 30489099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analyzing matrices of meta-analytic correlations: current practices and recommendations.
    Sheng Z; Kong W; Cortina JM; Hou S
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Jun; 7(2):187-208. PubMed ID: 27286903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Bayesian "fill-in" method for correcting for publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Du H; Liu F; Wang L
    Psychol Methods; 2017 Dec; 22(4):799-817. PubMed ID: 29265851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Statistical primer: methodology and reporting of meta-analyses.
    Buccheri S; Sodeck GH; Capodanno D
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2018 Apr; 53(4):708-713. PubMed ID: 29538746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Some properties of p-curves, with an application to gradual publication bias.
    Ulrich R; Miller J
    Psychol Methods; 2018 Sep; 23(3):546-560. PubMed ID: 28425729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. P-hacking in meta-analyses: A formalization and new meta-analytic methods.
    Mathur MB
    Res Synth Methods; 2024 May; 15(3):483-499. PubMed ID: 38273211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Meta-regression approximations to reduce publication selection bias.
    Stanley TD; Doucouliagos H
    Res Synth Methods; 2014 Mar; 5(1):60-78. PubMed ID: 26054026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sensitivity analysis for publication bias in meta-analysis of diagnostic studies for a continuous biomarker.
    Hattori S; Zhou XH
    Stat Med; 2018 Feb; 37(3):327-342. PubMed ID: 28990209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A parsimonious weight function for modeling publication bias.
    Citkowicz M; Vevea JL
    Psychol Methods; 2017 Mar; 22(1):28-41. PubMed ID: 28252998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta-analysis.
    Ioannidis JP
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):951-7. PubMed ID: 19018930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Publication bias in psychological science: prevalence, methods for identifying and controlling, and implications for the use of meta-analyses.
    Ferguson CJ; Brannick MT
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Mar; 17(1):120-8. PubMed ID: 21787082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Statistical methods for dealing with publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Jin ZC; Zhou XH; He J
    Stat Med; 2015 Jan; 34(2):343-60. PubMed ID: 25363575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Examining reproducibility in psychology: A hybrid method for combining a statistically significant original study and a replication.
    van Aert RCM; van Assen MALM
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Aug; 50(4):1515-1539. PubMed ID: 28936638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance of the trim and fill method in the presence of publication bias and between-study heterogeneity.
    Peters JL; Sutton AJ; Jones DR; Abrams KR; Rushton L
    Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(25):4544-62. PubMed ID: 17476644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. P value-driven methods were underpowered to detect publication bias: analysis of Cochrane review meta-analyses.
    Furuya-Kanamori L; Xu C; Lin L; Doan T; Chu H; Thalib L; Doi SAR
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Feb; 118():86-92. PubMed ID: 31743750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How to do a meta-analysis.
    Field AP; Gillett R
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Nov; 63(Pt 3):665-94. PubMed ID: 20497626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.