150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27695805)
1. Comparison of visual and electronic devices for individual identification of dromedary camels under different farming conditions.
Caja G; Díaz-Medina E; Salama AA; Salama OA; El-Shafie MH; El-Metwaly HA; Ayadi M; Aljumaah RS; Alshaikh MA; Yahyahoui MH; Seddik MM; Hammadi M; Khorchani T; Amann O; Cabrera S
J Anim Sci; 2016 Aug; 94(8):3561-3571. PubMed ID: 27695805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Long-term performance of visual and electronic identification devices in dairy goats.
Carné S; Caja G; Ghirardi JJ; Salama AA
J Dairy Sci; 2009 Apr; 92(4):1500-11. PubMed ID: 19307631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Modeling the retention of rumen boluses for the electronic identification of goats.
Carné S; Caja G; Ghirardi JJ; Salama AA
J Dairy Sci; 2011 Feb; 94(2):716-26. PubMed ID: 21257040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Readability of visual and electronic leg tags versus rumen boluses and electronic ear tags for the permanent identification of dairy goats.
Carné S; Caja G; Rojas-Olivares MA; Salama AA
J Dairy Sci; 2010 Nov; 93(11):5157-66. PubMed ID: 20965331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Extended field test on the use of visual ear tags and electronic boluses for the identification of different goat breeds in the United States.
Carné S; Gipson TA; Rovai M; Merkel RC; Caja G
J Anim Sci; 2009 Jul; 87(7):2419-27. PubMed ID: 19329484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of visual and electronic identification devices in pigs: on-farm performances.
Babot D; Hernández-Jover M; Caja G; Santamarina C; Ghirardi JJ
J Anim Sci; 2006 Sep; 84(9):2575-81. PubMed ID: 16908663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Retention of different sizes of electronic identification boluses in the forestomachs of sheep.
Ghirardi JJ; Caja G; Garín D; Hernández-Jover M; Ribó O; Casellas J
J Anim Sci; 2006 Oct; 84(10):2865-72. PubMed ID: 16971590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Electronic bolus design impacts on administration.
Hentz F; Umstätter C; Gilaverte S; Prado OR; Silva CJ; Monteiro AL
J Anim Sci; 2014 Jun; 92(6):2686-92. PubMed ID: 24753380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Lifetime traceability of weaner pigs in concrete-based and deep-litter production systems in Australia.
Schembri N; Sithole F; Toribio JA; Hernández-Jover M; Holyoake PK
J Anim Sci; 2007 Nov; 85(11):3123-30. PubMed ID: 17686903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Traceability of extensively produced Iberian pigs using visual and electronic identification devices from farm to slaughter.
Gosálvez LF; Santamarina C; Averós X; Hernández-Jover M; Caja G; Babot D
J Anim Sci; 2007 Oct; 85(10):2746-52. PubMed ID: 17609464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of visual and electronic identification devices in pigs: slaughterhouse performance.
Santamarina C; Hernández-Jover M; Babot D; Caja G
J Anim Sci; 2007 Feb; 85(2):497-502. PubMed ID: 17235033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of ear tags and injectable transponders for the identification and traceability of pigs from birth to the end of the slaughter line.
Caja G; Hernández-Jover M; Conill C; Garín D; Alabern X; Farriol B; Ghirardi J
J Anim Sci; 2005 Sep; 83(9):2215-24. PubMed ID: 16100077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Implementing electronic identification for performance recording in sheep: II. Cost-benefit analysis in meat and dairy farms.
Ait-Saidi A; Caja G; Salama AA; Milán MJ
J Dairy Sci; 2014 Dec; 97(12):7515-24. PubMed ID: 25282418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Suitability of electronic mini-boluses for the early identification of goat kids and effects on growth performance and development of the reticulorumen.
Castro N; Martín D; Castro-Alonso A; Argüello A; Capote J; Caja G
J Anim Sci; 2010 Oct; 88(10):3464-9. PubMed ID: 20525934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Implementing electronic identification for performance recording in sheep: I. Manual versus semiautomatic and automatic recording systems in dairy and meat farms.
Ait-Saidi A; Caja G; Salama AA; Carné S
J Dairy Sci; 2014 Dec; 97(12):7505-14. PubMed ID: 25282408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The development and use of electronic ruminal boluses as a vehicle for bovine identification.
Fallon RJ
Rev Sci Tech; 2001 Aug; 20(2):480-90. PubMed ID: 11548520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Suitability of electronic mini-boluses for early identification of lambs.
Ghirardi JJ; Caja G; Flores C; Garín D; Hernández-Jover M; Bocquier F
J Anim Sci; 2007 Jan; 85(1):248-57. PubMed ID: 17179563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the retention of electronic identification boluses in the forestomachs of cattle.
Ghirardi JJ; Caja G; Garín D; Casellas J; Hernández-Jover M
J Anim Sci; 2006 Aug; 84(8):2260-8. PubMed ID: 16864888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost evaluation of the use of conventional and electronic identification and registration systems for the national sheep and goat populations in Spain.
Saa C; Milán MJ; Caja G; Ghirardi JJ
J Anim Sci; 2005 May; 83(5):1215-25. PubMed ID: 15827266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of electronic leg tags for identification of small ruminants.
Abecia JA; Palacín I
Rev Sci Tech; 2014 Dec; 33(3):783-90. PubMed ID: 25812203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
