These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27696242)
1. Absolute binding free energies for octa-acids and guests in SAMPL5 : Evaluating binding free energies for octa-acid and guest complexes in the SAMPL5 blind challenge. Tofoleanu F; Lee J; Pickard Iv FC; König G; Huang J; Baek M; Seok C; Brooks BR J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Jan; 31(1):107-118. PubMed ID: 27696242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Absolute binding free energy calculations of CBClip host-guest systems in the SAMPL5 blind challenge. Lee J; Tofoleanu F; Pickard FC; König G; Huang J; Damjanović A; Baek M; Seok C; Brooks BR J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Jan; 31(1):71-85. PubMed ID: 27677749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the umbrella sampling and the double decoupling method in binding free energy predictions for SAMPL6 octa-acid host-guest challenges. Nishikawa N; Han K; Wu X; Tofoleanu F; Brooks BR J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1075-1086. PubMed ID: 30324304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The SAMPL5 host-guest challenge: computing binding free energies and enthalpies from explicit solvent simulations by the attach-pull-release (APR) method. Yin J; Henriksen NM; Slochower DR; Gilson MK J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Jan; 31(1):133-145. PubMed ID: 27638809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. On the fly estimation of host-guest binding free energies using the movable type method: participation in the SAMPL5 blind challenge. Bansal N; Zheng Z; Cerutti DS; Merz KM J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Jan; 31(1):47-60. PubMed ID: 27699553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Binding free energies in the SAMPL5 octa-acid host-guest challenge calculated with DFT-D3 and CCSD(T). Caldararu O; Olsson MA; Riplinger C; Neese F; Ryde U J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Jan; 31(1):87-106. PubMed ID: 27600554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Blinded predictions of host-guest standard free energies of binding in the SAMPL5 challenge. Bosisio S; Mey ASJS; Michel J J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Jan; 31(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 27503495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prediction of CB[8] host-guest binding free energies in SAMPL6 using the double-decoupling method. Han K; Hudson PS; Jones MR; Nishikawa N; Tofoleanu F; Brooks BR J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1059-1073. PubMed ID: 30084077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Resolving the problem of trapped water in binding cavities: prediction of host-guest binding free energies in the SAMPL5 challenge by funnel metadynamics. Bhakat S; Söderhjelm P J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Jan; 31(1):119-132. PubMed ID: 27573983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A combined treatment of hydration and dynamical effects for the modeling of host-guest binding thermodynamics: the SAMPL5 blinded challenge. Pal RK; Haider K; Kaur D; Flynn W; Xia J; Levy RM; Taran T; Wickstrom L; Kurtzman T; Gallicchio E J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Jan; 31(1):29-44. PubMed ID: 27696239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Binding free energies in the SAMPL6 octa-acid host-guest challenge calculated with MM and QM methods. Caldararu O; Olsson MA; Misini Ignjatović M; Wang M; Ryde U J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1027-1046. PubMed ID: 30203229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. SAMPL6 host-guest challenge: binding free energies via a multistep approach. Eken Y; Patel P; Díaz T; Jones MR; Wilson AK J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1097-1115. PubMed ID: 30225724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The SAMPL6 SAMPLing challenge: assessing the reliability and efficiency of binding free energy calculations. Rizzi A; Jensen T; Slochower DR; Aldeghi M; Gapsys V; Ntekoumes D; Bosisio S; Papadourakis M; Henriksen NM; de Groot BL; Cournia Z; Dickson A; Michel J; Gilson MK; Shirts MR; Mobley DL; Chodera JD J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 May; 34(5):601-633. PubMed ID: 31984465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. SAMPL6 host-guest binding affinities and binding poses from spherical-coordinates-biased simulations. Sun Z; He Q; Li X; Zhu Z J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 May; 34(5):589-600. PubMed ID: 31974852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predicting binding affinities of host-guest systems in the SAMPL3 blind challenge: the performance of relative free energy calculations. König G; Brooks BR J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2012 May; 26(5):543-50. PubMed ID: 22198474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Blinded predictions of standard binding free energies: lessons learned from the SAMPL6 challenge. Papadourakis M; Bosisio S; Michel J J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1047-1058. PubMed ID: 30159717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Lessons learned from comparing molecular dynamics engines on the SAMPL5 dataset. Shirts MR; Klein C; Swails JM; Yin J; Gilson MK; Mobley DL; Case DA; Zhong ED J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Jan; 31(1):147-161. PubMed ID: 27787702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Overview of the SAMPL5 host-guest challenge: Are we doing better? Yin J; Henriksen NM; Slochower DR; Shirts MR; Chiu MW; Mobley DL; Gilson MK J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Jan; 31(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 27658802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Detailed potential of mean force studies on host-guest systems from the SAMPL6 challenge. Song LF; Bansal N; Zheng Z; Merz KM J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1013-1026. PubMed ID: 30143917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]