115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27696920)
1. Stress distribution on short implants with different designs: a photoelastic analysis.
Goiato MC; de Medeiros RA; Sônego MV; de Lima TM; Pesqueira AA; Dos Santos DM
J Med Eng Technol; 2017 Feb; 41(2):115-121. PubMed ID: 27696920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Photoelastic analysis of biomechanical behavior of single and multiple fixed partial prostheses with different prosthetic connections.
Tonella BP; Pellizzer EP; Falcón-Antenucci RM; Ferraço R; de Faria Almeida DA
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 22(6):2060-3. PubMed ID: 22067856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Photoelastic stress analysis in screwed and cemented implant-supported dentures with external hexagon implants.
Pellizzer EP; Tonella BP; Ferraço R; Falcón-Antenucci RM; de Carvalho PS; Alves-Rezende MC
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 21(4):1110-3. PubMed ID: 20613577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Photoelastic analysis of cemented or screwed implant-supported prostheses with different prosthetic connections.
Tonella BP; Pellizzer EP; Ferraço R; Falcón-Antenucci RM; Carvalho PS; Goiato MC
J Oral Implantol; 2011 Aug; 37(4):401-10. PubMed ID: 21851260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Photoelastic Analysis on Different Retention Methods of Implant-Supported Prosthesis.
Pimentel AC; Manzi MR; Polo CI; Sendyk CL; da Graça Naclério-Homem M; Sendyk WR
J Oral Implantol; 2015 Jun; 41(3):258-63. PubMed ID: 25198152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Photoelastic analysis of stress distribution with different implant systems.
Pellizzer EP; Carli RI; Falcón-Antenucci RM; Verri FR; Goiato MC; Villa LM
J Oral Implantol; 2014 Apr; 40(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 22208909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stress distribution in bone simulation model with pre-angled implants.
Goiato MC; Arsufi GS; de Medeiros RA; Pesqueira AA; Guiotti AM; dos Santos DM
J Med Eng Technol; 2015; 39(6):322-7. PubMed ID: 26100976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stress distribution in implant-supported prosthesis with external and internal implant-abutment connections.
Coelho Goiato M; Pesqueira AA; Falcón-Antenucci RM; Dos Santos DM; Haddad MF; Bannwart LC; Moreno A
Acta Odontol Scand; 2013 Mar; 71(2):283-8. PubMed ID: 22486241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical evaluation of spring system for implant-supported prosthesis: analysis by photoelasticity and extensometry.
Goiato MC; de Medeiros RA; da Silva EV; Sônego MV; Dos Santos DM
J Med Eng Technol; 2017 May; 41(4):309-313. PubMed ID: 28351185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Stress distribution in implant-supported prostheses using different connection systems and cantilever lengths: digital photoelasticity.
Goiato MC; Shibayama R; Gennari Filho H; de Medeiros RA; Pesqueira AA; dos Santos DM; de Araújo CA
J Med Eng Technol; 2016; 40(2):35-42. PubMed ID: 26783652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of crown-to-implant ratio on stress around single short-wide implants: a photoelastic stress analysis.
Sotto-Maior BS; Senna PM; da Silva-Neto JP; de Arruda Nóbilo MA; Del Bel Cury AA
J Prosthodont; 2015 Jan; 24(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 24919655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stress distribution of different implant connections associated with multiple implant-supported prostheses.
Goiato MC; Sarauza Arsufi G; de Medeiros RA; Pesqueira AA; da Silva EVF; Sonego MV; Dos Santos DM
J Med Eng Technol; 2018 Jul; 42(5):359-367. PubMed ID: 30251571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of loading and use of occlusal splint in implant-supported fixed prostheses.
Teixeira FM; de Assis Claro CA; Neves AC; de Mello Rode S; da Silva-Concílio LR
J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 23(5):e477-80. PubMed ID: 22976715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Photoelastic stress analysis in prosthetic implants of different diameters: mini, narrow, standard or wide.
Coelho Goiato M; Pesqueira AA; Santos DM; Haddad MF; Moreno A
J Clin Diagn Res; 2014 Sep; 8(9):ZC86-90. PubMed ID: 25386531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Photoelastic stress analysis of different designs of cement-retained fixed partial dentures on Morse taper oral implants.
Menani LR; Tiossi R; de Torres ÉM; Ribeiro RF; de Almeida RP
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 22(2):674-8. PubMed ID: 21415635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of the number of supporting implants on mandibular photoelastic models with different implant-retained overdenture designs.
Celik G; Uludag B
J Prosthodont; 2014 Jul; 23(5):374-80. PubMed ID: 24417330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Photoelastic analysis of stress distribution in different retention systems for facial prosthesis.
Goiato MC; Ribeiro Pdo P; Pellizzer EP; Garcia Júnior IR; Pesqueira AA; Haddad MF
J Craniofac Surg; 2009 May; 20(3):757-61. PubMed ID: 19381103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Narrow-diameter implants as terminal support for occlusal three-unit FPDs: a biomechanical analysis.
Cehreli MC; Akça K
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2004 Dec; 24(6):513-9. PubMed ID: 15626314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative analysis of stress in a new proposal of dental implants.
Valente MLDC; de Castro DT; Macedo AP; Shimano AC; Dos Reis AC
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2017 Aug; 77():360-365. PubMed ID: 28532041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of vertical and angular misfit in implant-supported fixed prostheses.
Assunção WG; Gomes EA; Rocha EP; Delben JA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):788-96. PubMed ID: 21841989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
