BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27697388)

  • 21. How long do acute coronary syndrome patients wait for reperfusion, diagnostic coronary angiography and surgical revascularisation?
    Voss J; Martin A; Caldwell I; Lee M; Kerr AJ
    N Z Med J; 2013 Jun; 126(1376):38-48. PubMed ID: 23822960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Predictors and outcomes associated with radial versus femoral access for intervention in patients with acute coronary syndrome in a real-world setting: results from the Acute Coronary Syndrome Israeli Survey (ACSIS) 2010.
    Fefer P; Matetzky S; Gannot S; Gottlieb S; Meerkin D; Bubyr L; Gavrielov N; Zahger D; Goldenberg I; Kornowski R; Segev A
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2014 Aug; 26(8):398-402. PubMed ID: 25091101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Meta-Analysis of Radial Versus Femoral Access for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome.
    Bavishi C; Panwar SR; Dangas GD; Barman N; Hasan CM; Baber U; Kini AS; Sharma SK
    Am J Cardiol; 2016 Jan; 117(2):172-8. PubMed ID: 26704032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Transradial versus transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndromes: re-evaluation of the current body of evidence.
    Lee MS; Wolfe M; Stone GW
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Nov; 6(11):1149-52. PubMed ID: 24262614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of radial versus femoral artery access in patients with acute coronary syndromes with or without ST-segment elevation.
    Mehta SR; Jolly SS; Cairns J; Niemela K; Rao SV; Cheema AN; Steg PG; Cantor WJ; Džavík V; Budaj A; Rokoss M; Valentin V; Gao P; Yusuf S;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2012 Dec; 60(24):2490-9. PubMed ID: 23103036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Radial versus femoral access, bleeding and ischemic events in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome managed with an invasive strategy.
    Klutstein MW; Westerhout CM; Armstrong PW; Giugliano RP; Lewis BS; Gibson CM; Lutchmedial S; Widimsky P; Steg PG; Dalby A; Zeymer U; Van de Werf F; Harrington RA; Newby LK; Rao SV
    Am Heart J; 2013 Apr; 165(4):583-590.e1. PubMed ID: 23537976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention is associated with lower patient radiation exposure in high-radial-volume centres: Insights from the RAY'ACT-1 study.
    Georges JL; Belle L; Meunier L; Dechery T; Khalifé K; Pecheux M; Elhaddad S; Amabile N; Pansieri M; Ballout J; Marchand X; Rouault G; Leddet P; Nugue O; Lucke N; Cattan S;
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2017 Mar; 110(3):179-187. PubMed ID: 28117244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of quality-of-life measures after radial versus femoral artery access for cardiac catheterization in women: Results of the Study of Access Site for Enhancement of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Women quality-of-life substudy.
    Hess CN; Krucoff MW; Sheng S; Anstrom KJ; Barham WB; Gilchrist IC; Harrington RA; Jacobs AK; Mehran R; Messenger JC; Mark DB; Rao SV
    Am Heart J; 2015 Aug; 170(2):371-9. PubMed ID: 26299236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Acute kidney injury after percutaneous coronary intervention: Rationale of the AKI-MATRIX (acute kidney injury-minimizing adverse hemorrhagic events by TRansradial access site and systemic implementation of angioX) sub-study.
    Andò G; Cortese B; Frigoli E; Gagnor A; Garducci S; Briguori C; Rubartelli P; Calabrò P; Valgimigli M;
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Nov; 86(5):950-7. PubMed ID: 25854692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Radial Versus Femoral Access in Invasively Managed Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Andò G; Capodanno D
    Ann Intern Med; 2015 Dec; 163(12):932-40. PubMed ID: 26551857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. National variation in coronary angiography rates and timing after an acute coronary syndrome in New Zealand (ANZACS-QI 6).
    Williams MJ; Harding SA; Devlin G; Nunn C; El-Jack S; Scott T; Lee M; Kerr AJ;
    N Z Med J; 2016 Jan; 129(1428):66-78. PubMed ID: 26914194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Is There Inequity in Hospital Care Among Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Who Are Proficient and Not Proficient in English Language?: Analysis of the SNAPSHOT ACS Study.
    Hyun KK; Redfern J; Woodward M; Briffa T; Chew DP; Ellis C; French J; Astley C; Gamble G; Nallaiah K; Howell T; Lintern K; Clark R; Wechkunanukul K; Brieger D
    J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2017; 32(3):288-295. PubMed ID: 27617562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Radial versus femoral access for orally anticoagulated patients.
    Ziakas AG; Koskinas KC; Gavrilidis S; Giannoglou GD; Hadjimiltiades S; Gourassas I; Theofilogiannakos E; Economou F; Styliadis I
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Oct; 76(4):493-9. PubMed ID: 20882651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Radial versus femoral access for primary percutaneous interventions in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Karrowni W; Vyas A; Giacomino B; Schweizer M; Blevins A; Girotra S; Horwitz PA
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Aug; 6(8):814-23. PubMed ID: 23968700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Impact of arterial access site on outcomes after primary percutaneous coronary intervention: prespecified subgroup analysis from the EUROMAX trial.
    Hamon M; Coste P; Van't Hof A; Ten Berg J; Clemmensen P; Tabone X; Benamer H; Kristensen SD; Cavallini C; Marzocchi A; Hamm C; Kanic V; Bernstein D; Anthopoulos P; Deliargyris EN; Steg PG
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Jun; 8(6):e002049. PubMed ID: 26056249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Reperfusion Times for Radial Versus Femoral Access in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Observations From the Cardiac Care Network Provincial Primary PCI Registry.
    Cantor WJ; Ko DT; Natarajan MK; Džavík V; Wijeysundera HC; Wang JT; Kingsbury KJ; Velianou JL; Cohen EA; Le May MR; Tu JV
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 May; 8(5):. PubMed ID: 25910502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of acute coronary syndrome patients with left anterior hemiblock.
    Zhang H; Goodman SG; Steg GP; Budaj A; Lopez-Sendon J; Dorian P; Huynh T; Mangat I; Wong GC; Spencer FA; Yan AT; ;
    Heart; 2014 Sep; 100(18):1456-61. PubMed ID: 24842872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A registry-based randomized trial comparing radial and femoral approaches in women undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the SAFE-PCI for Women (Study of Access Site for Enhancement of PCI for Women) trial.
    Rao SV; Hess CN; Barham B; Aberle LH; Anstrom KJ; Patel TB; Jorgensen JP; Mazzaferri EL; Jolly SS; Jacobs A; Newby LK; Gibson CM; Kong DF; Mehran R; Waksman R; Gilchrist IC; McCourt BJ; Messenger JC; Peterson ED; Harrington RA; Krucoff MW
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Aug; 7(8):857-67. PubMed ID: 25147030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Radial versus femoral access in acute coronary syndromes.
    Pristipino C
    Lancet; 2011 Aug; 378(9792):661; author reply 661-2. PubMed ID: 21856470
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Radial versus femoral access in acute coronary syndromes.
    Chong AY
    Lancet; 2011 Aug; 378(9792):661; author reply 661-2. PubMed ID: 21856471
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.