These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27697423)

  • 1. A problem unstuck? Evaluating the effectiveness of sticker prompts for encouraging household food waste recycling behaviour.
    Shearer L; Gatersleben B; Morse S; Smyth M; Hunt S
    Waste Manag; 2017 Feb; 60():164-172. PubMed ID: 27697423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Explaining the differences in household food waste collection and treatment provisions between local authorities in England and Wales.
    Bees AD; Williams ID
    Waste Manag; 2017 Dec; 70():222-235. PubMed ID: 28918870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The impact of alternate weekly collections on waste arisings.
    Williams ID; Cole C
    Sci Total Environ; 2013 Feb; 445-446():29-40. PubMed ID: 23314120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A proposed framework of food waste collection and recycling for renewable biogas fuel production in Hong Kong.
    Woon KS; Lo IM
    Waste Manag; 2016 Jan; 47(Pt A):3-10. PubMed ID: 25890872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantitative assessment of distance to collection point and improved sorting information on source separation of household waste.
    Rousta K; Bolton K; Lundin M; Dahlén L
    Waste Manag; 2015 Jun; 40():22-30. PubMed ID: 25817721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Solid-waste management practices of households in Manila, Philippines.
    Bernardo EC
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2008 Oct; 1140():420-4. PubMed ID: 18991942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Household food waste separation behavior and the importance of convenience.
    Bernstad A
    Waste Manag; 2014 Jul; 34(7):1317-23. PubMed ID: 24780762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. New developments in waste management in the Netherlands.
    Goorhuis M; Reus P; Nieuwenhuis E; Spanbroek N; Sol M; van Rijn J
    Waste Manag Res; 2012 Sep; 30(9 Suppl):67-77. PubMed ID: 22993136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Source segregation and food waste prevention activities in high-density households in a deprived urban area.
    Rispo A; Williams ID; Shaw PJ
    Waste Manag; 2015 Oct; 44():15-27. PubMed ID: 26233881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Barriers and Enablers to Food Waste Recycling: A Mixed Methods Study amongst UK Citizens.
    Allison AL; Lorencatto F; Michie S; Miodownik M
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Feb; 19(5):. PubMed ID: 35270421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Direct and indirect effects of waste management policies on household waste behaviour: The case of Sweden.
    Andersson C; Stage J
    Waste Manag; 2018 Jun; 76():19-27. PubMed ID: 29605305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Household solid waste characteristics and management in Chittagong, Bangladesh.
    Sujauddin M; Huda SM; Hoque AT
    Waste Manag; 2008; 28(9):1688-95. PubMed ID: 17845843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimating informal household food waste in developed countries: the case of Australia.
    Reynolds CJ; Mavrakis V; Davison S; Høj SB; Vlaholias E; Sharp A; Thompson K; Ward P; Coveney J; Piantadosi J; Boland J; Dawson D
    Waste Manag Res; 2014 Dec; 32(12):1254-8. PubMed ID: 25248761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Source segregation of food waste in office areas: Factors affecting waste generation rates and quality.
    Edjabou ME; Boldrin A; Scheutz C; Astrup TF
    Waste Manag; 2015 Dec; 46():94-102. PubMed ID: 26260965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Destined for indecision? A critical analysis of waste management practices in England from 1996 to 2013.
    Farmer TD; Shaw PJ; Williams ID
    Waste Manag; 2015 May; 39():266-76. PubMed ID: 25771762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Distance is a barrier to recycling - or is it? Surprises from a clean test.
    Li C; Zhang Y; Nouvellet P; Okoro JO; Xiao W; Harder MK
    Waste Manag; 2020 May; 108():183-188. PubMed ID: 32361534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. LCA of local strategies for energy recovery from waste in England, applied to a large municipal flow.
    Tunesi S
    Waste Manag; 2011 Mar; 31(3):561-71. PubMed ID: 20937556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Life cycle assessment of a household solid waste source separation programme: a Swedish case study.
    Bernstad A; la Cour Jansen J; Aspegren H
    Waste Manag Res; 2011 Oct; 29(10):1027-42. PubMed ID: 21824984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Post-consumer plastic packaging waste in England: Assessing the yield of multiple collection-recycling schemes.
    Hahladakis JN; Purnell P; Iacovidou E; Velis CA; Atseyinku M
    Waste Manag; 2018 May; 75():149-159. PubMed ID: 29439928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Food waste from Danish households: Generation and composition.
    Edjabou ME; Petersen C; Scheutz C; Astrup TF
    Waste Manag; 2016 Jun; 52():256-68. PubMed ID: 27026492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.