These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Hypnosis in contact lens fitting. Farkas P; Kassalow TW J Am Optom Assoc; 1976 Mar; 47(3):378. PubMed ID: 1027844 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of teleoptometry to evaluate acceptability of rigid gas-permeable contact lens fits. Smythe J; Yolton RL; Leroy A; Achong R; Caroline P; Van Nurden M; Yolton D Optometry; 2001 Jan; 72(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 11217001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison between nomogram vs. trial fitting of rigid gas permeable contact lenses. Postma JT; Postma AM; Schnider CM J Am Optom Assoc; 1993 Apr; 64(4):258-63. PubMed ID: 8315202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Rigid contact lens fitting relationships in keratoconus. Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study Group. Edrington TB; Szczotka LB; Barr JT; Achtenberg JF; Burger DS; Janoff AM; Olafsson HE; Chun MW; Boyle JW; Gordon MO; Zadnik K Optom Vis Sci; 1999 Oct; 76(10):692-9. PubMed ID: 10524784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The remarkable evolution of contact lens care. Bartlett JD J Am Optom Assoc; 1986 Mar; 57(3):168. PubMed ID: 3457080 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Factors determining rigid contact lens flexure. Corzine JC; Klein SA Optom Vis Sci; 1997 Aug; 74(8):639-45. PubMed ID: 9323735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Orthokeratology: part I historical perspective. Coon LJ J Am Optom Assoc; 1982 Mar; 53(3):187-95. PubMed ID: 7042802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The lacrimal lens as an assessment factor in hard contact lens fitting. Gowans M Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1995 Sep; 15(5):499-500. PubMed ID: 8524582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Flexure of rigid contact lenses on toric corneas as a function of base curve fitting relationship. Herman JP J Am Optom Assoc; 1983 Mar; 54(3):209-13. PubMed ID: 6841871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Determination of the total attenuation coefficient for six contact lens materials using the Beer-Lambert law. Hull CC; Crofts NC Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1996 Mar; 16(2):150-7. PubMed ID: 8762777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Contact lens fitting profile in Portugal in 2005: strategies for first fits and refits. González-Méijome JM; Jorge J; Almeida JB; Parafita MA Eye Contact Lens; 2007 Mar; 33(2):81-8. PubMed ID: 17496700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Spectral optical coherence tomography: a new imaging technique in contact lens practice. Kałuzny BJ; Kaluzny JJ; Szkulmowska A; Gorczyńska I; Szkulmowski M; Bajraszewski T; Targowski P; Kowalczyk A Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2006 Mar; 26(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 16460312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of different rigid contact lenses: edge thicknesses and contours. Morris SD; Lowther GE J Am Optom Assoc; 1981 Mar; 52(3):247-9. PubMed ID: 7229244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Learning the "numbers game" of today's contact lens fitting: clinical and business pearls. Hostetter TA J Ophthalmic Nurs Technol; 1996; 15(4):148-52. PubMed ID: 8954412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]